合理的距离

Lisa O’Connell
{"title":"合理的距离","authors":"Lisa O’Connell","doi":"10.4324/9780429488689-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the eighteenth century, the South Pacific became available to European expansion, and specifically to British exploration, trade and penal settlement. Recent scholarship has shown that this expansion occurred without agreement as to its function and benefits. As Jonathan Lamb has argued, the establishment of Britain’s Pacific dominions was characterised less by deliberate policy than by confusion in the face of the unknown. For all its immediacy and emotion, however, the early Pacific colonialism of sensibility, as we might call it, barely lasted into the nineteenth century. In the wake of the establishment of the Botany Bay penal colony, and in the aftermath of 1789, the Pacific was increasingly figured as a place of settlement. Wakefield’s theory was essentially a colonial adaptation of Ricardo’s analysis of the relations between land, labour and capital. Wakefield radically refigures the global sympathy appealed to by eighteenth-century benevolent sentimentalists like the elder Forster as something like the industrial production of human beings.","PeriodicalId":269594,"journal":{"name":"Matters of Engagement","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensible distances\",\"authors\":\"Lisa O’Connell\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429488689-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the eighteenth century, the South Pacific became available to European expansion, and specifically to British exploration, trade and penal settlement. Recent scholarship has shown that this expansion occurred without agreement as to its function and benefits. As Jonathan Lamb has argued, the establishment of Britain’s Pacific dominions was characterised less by deliberate policy than by confusion in the face of the unknown. For all its immediacy and emotion, however, the early Pacific colonialism of sensibility, as we might call it, barely lasted into the nineteenth century. In the wake of the establishment of the Botany Bay penal colony, and in the aftermath of 1789, the Pacific was increasingly figured as a place of settlement. Wakefield’s theory was essentially a colonial adaptation of Ricardo’s analysis of the relations between land, labour and capital. Wakefield radically refigures the global sympathy appealed to by eighteenth-century benevolent sentimentalists like the elder Forster as something like the industrial production of human beings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Matters of Engagement\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Matters of Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429488689-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Matters of Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429488689-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在18世纪,南太平洋成为欧洲扩张的可利用之地,特别是英国的勘探、贸易和罪犯安置。最近的学术研究表明,这种扩张并未就其功能和益处达成一致。正如乔纳森•兰姆(Jonathan Lamb)所言,英国在太平洋地区建立领土的特点,与其说是出于深思熟虑的政策,不如说是出于面对未知的困惑。然而,尽管它具有直接性和情感,我们可以称之为早期的太平洋感性殖民主义,几乎没有持续到19世纪。随着植物学湾流放地的建立,以及1789年之后,太平洋逐渐被视为一个移民地。韦克菲尔德的理论本质上是对李嘉图关于土地、劳动力和资本之间关系的分析的殖民改编。韦克菲尔德彻底重塑了18世纪仁慈的多愁善感主义者,如老福斯特,所呼吁的全球同情,就像人类的工业生产一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sensible distances
During the eighteenth century, the South Pacific became available to European expansion, and specifically to British exploration, trade and penal settlement. Recent scholarship has shown that this expansion occurred without agreement as to its function and benefits. As Jonathan Lamb has argued, the establishment of Britain’s Pacific dominions was characterised less by deliberate policy than by confusion in the face of the unknown. For all its immediacy and emotion, however, the early Pacific colonialism of sensibility, as we might call it, barely lasted into the nineteenth century. In the wake of the establishment of the Botany Bay penal colony, and in the aftermath of 1789, the Pacific was increasingly figured as a place of settlement. Wakefield’s theory was essentially a colonial adaptation of Ricardo’s analysis of the relations between land, labour and capital. Wakefield radically refigures the global sympathy appealed to by eighteenth-century benevolent sentimentalists like the elder Forster as something like the industrial production of human beings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Matters of engagement. Emotions, identity, and cultural contact in the Premodern world Bridging the gap Riding the juggernaut Robbing the grave Sensible distances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1