改变领土

Transnational Hispaniola Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.5744/FLORIDA/9781683400387.003.0002

Nathalie Bragadir

{"title":"改变领土","authors":"Nathalie Bragadir","doi":"10.5744/FLORIDA/9781683400387.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 1 examines mapping practices in colonial Hispaniola, focusing specifically on how historical actors manipulated allegiance to one European power or the other, playing Saint-Domingue off Santo Domingo. The chapter uses border theory and studies of frontier relations to argue that shifting allegiances along the colonial border meant that the border could never be consolidated or represent the hegemony of European control over the region.","PeriodicalId":106140,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Hispaniola","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shifting Territories\",\"authors\":\"Nathalie Bragadir\",\"doi\":\"10.5744/FLORIDA/9781683400387.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 1 examines mapping practices in colonial Hispaniola, focusing specifically on how historical actors manipulated allegiance to one European power or the other, playing Saint-Domingue off Santo Domingo. The chapter uses border theory and studies of frontier relations to argue that shifting allegiances along the colonial border meant that the border could never be consolidated or represent the hegemony of European control over the region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Hispaniola\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Hispaniola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5744/FLORIDA/9781683400387.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Hispaniola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/FLORIDA/9781683400387.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

第一章考察了殖民地伊斯帕尼奥拉岛的制图实践，特别关注历史角色如何操纵效忠于一个或另一个欧洲大国，扮演圣多明各和圣多明各。这一章使用边界理论和边界关系的研究来论证沿着殖民边界的忠诚转移意味着边界永远不能被巩固或代表欧洲对该地区的控制霸权。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Shifting Territories

Chapter 1 examines mapping practices in colonial Hispaniola, focusing specifically on how historical actors manipulated allegiance to one European power or the other, playing Saint-Domingue off Santo Domingo. The chapter uses border theory and studies of frontier relations to argue that shifting allegiances along the colonial border meant that the border could never be consolidated or represent the hegemony of European control over the region.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助