{"title":"使用CMMC 2.0对中小企业的网络安全足迹进行量化","authors":"Y. Levy, Ruti Gafni","doi":"10.36965/ojakm.2022.10(1)43-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations, small and big, are faced with major cybersecurity challenges over the past several decades, as the proliferation of information systems and mobile devices expand. While larger organizations invest significant efforts in developing approaches to deal with cybersecurity incidents, Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) are still struggling with ways to both keep their businesses alive and secure their systems to the best of their abilities. When it comes to critical systems, such as defense industries, the interconnectivities of organizations in the supply-chain have demonstrated to be problematic given the depth required to provide a high-level cybersecurity posture. The United States (U.S.) Department of Defense (DoD) with the partnership of the Defense Industry Base (DIB) have developed the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) in 2020 with a third-party mandate for Level 1 certification. Following an outcry from many DIB organizations, a newly revised CMMC 2.0 was introduced in late 2021 where Level 1 (Fundamental) was adjusted for annual self-assessment. CMMC 2.0 provides the 17 practices that organizations should self-assess. While these 17 practices provide initial guidance for assessment, the specific level of measurement and how it impacts their overall cybersecurity posture is vague. Specifically, many of these practices use non-quantifiable terms such as “limit”, “verify”, “control”, “identify”, etc. The focus of this work is to provide SMBs with a quantifiable method to self-assess their Cybersecurity Footprint following the CMMC 2.0 Level 1 practices. This paper outlines the foundational literature work conducted in support of the proposed quantification Cybersecurity Footprint Index (CFI) using 26 elements that correspond to the relevant CMMC 2.0 Level 1 practices.","PeriodicalId":325473,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the quantification of cybersecurity footprint for SMBs using the CMMC 2.0\",\"authors\":\"Y. Levy, Ruti Gafni\",\"doi\":\"10.36965/ojakm.2022.10(1)43-61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizations, small and big, are faced with major cybersecurity challenges over the past several decades, as the proliferation of information systems and mobile devices expand. While larger organizations invest significant efforts in developing approaches to deal with cybersecurity incidents, Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) are still struggling with ways to both keep their businesses alive and secure their systems to the best of their abilities. When it comes to critical systems, such as defense industries, the interconnectivities of organizations in the supply-chain have demonstrated to be problematic given the depth required to provide a high-level cybersecurity posture. The United States (U.S.) Department of Defense (DoD) with the partnership of the Defense Industry Base (DIB) have developed the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) in 2020 with a third-party mandate for Level 1 certification. Following an outcry from many DIB organizations, a newly revised CMMC 2.0 was introduced in late 2021 where Level 1 (Fundamental) was adjusted for annual self-assessment. CMMC 2.0 provides the 17 practices that organizations should self-assess. While these 17 practices provide initial guidance for assessment, the specific level of measurement and how it impacts their overall cybersecurity posture is vague. Specifically, many of these practices use non-quantifiable terms such as “limit”, “verify”, “control”, “identify”, etc. The focus of this work is to provide SMBs with a quantifiable method to self-assess their Cybersecurity Footprint following the CMMC 2.0 Level 1 practices. This paper outlines the foundational literature work conducted in support of the proposed quantification Cybersecurity Footprint Index (CFI) using 26 elements that correspond to the relevant CMMC 2.0 Level 1 practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36965/ojakm.2022.10(1)43-61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36965/ojakm.2022.10(1)43-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards the quantification of cybersecurity footprint for SMBs using the CMMC 2.0
Organizations, small and big, are faced with major cybersecurity challenges over the past several decades, as the proliferation of information systems and mobile devices expand. While larger organizations invest significant efforts in developing approaches to deal with cybersecurity incidents, Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) are still struggling with ways to both keep their businesses alive and secure their systems to the best of their abilities. When it comes to critical systems, such as defense industries, the interconnectivities of organizations in the supply-chain have demonstrated to be problematic given the depth required to provide a high-level cybersecurity posture. The United States (U.S.) Department of Defense (DoD) with the partnership of the Defense Industry Base (DIB) have developed the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) in 2020 with a third-party mandate for Level 1 certification. Following an outcry from many DIB organizations, a newly revised CMMC 2.0 was introduced in late 2021 where Level 1 (Fundamental) was adjusted for annual self-assessment. CMMC 2.0 provides the 17 practices that organizations should self-assess. While these 17 practices provide initial guidance for assessment, the specific level of measurement and how it impacts their overall cybersecurity posture is vague. Specifically, many of these practices use non-quantifiable terms such as “limit”, “verify”, “control”, “identify”, etc. The focus of this work is to provide SMBs with a quantifiable method to self-assess their Cybersecurity Footprint following the CMMC 2.0 Level 1 practices. This paper outlines the foundational literature work conducted in support of the proposed quantification Cybersecurity Footprint Index (CFI) using 26 elements that correspond to the relevant CMMC 2.0 Level 1 practices.