{"title":"反对科学帝国主义","authors":"J. Dupré","doi":"10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.2.192948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opponents of the unity of science have generally been concerned with horizontal relations between theories, with attempts, that is, to subsume scientific accounts of complex objects under accounts of the behavior of their constituent parts. In this paper I suggest that scientific pluralism should be defended not only against this traditional physicalistic and mechanistic reductionism, but also against the imperialistic expansion of quite specialized scientific perspectives into ever wider domains of application. This tendency is particularly prevalent in scientific approaches to human behavior, and is most clearly illustrated by the imperialist aspirations of economics and evolutionary biology. Here I illustrate the problem primarily with reference to some of the worst excesses of imperialist economics.","PeriodicalId":288090,"journal":{"name":"PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Against Scientific Imperialism\",\"authors\":\"J. Dupré\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.2.192948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Opponents of the unity of science have generally been concerned with horizontal relations between theories, with attempts, that is, to subsume scientific accounts of complex objects under accounts of the behavior of their constituent parts. In this paper I suggest that scientific pluralism should be defended not only against this traditional physicalistic and mechanistic reductionism, but also against the imperialistic expansion of quite specialized scientific perspectives into ever wider domains of application. This tendency is particularly prevalent in scientific approaches to human behavior, and is most clearly illustrated by the imperialist aspirations of economics and evolutionary biology. Here I illustrate the problem primarily with reference to some of the worst excesses of imperialist economics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.2.192948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.2.192948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

反对科学统一性的人通常关注的是理论之间的横向关系,即试图将复杂物体的科学解释归入其组成部分的行为解释之下。在本文中,我建议捍卫科学多元主义,不仅要反对这种传统的物理主义和机械论的还原论,而且要反对将相当专门化的科学观点帝国主义地扩展到更广泛的应用领域。这种倾向在研究人类行为的科学方法中尤其普遍,经济学和进化生物学的帝国主义野心最清楚地说明了这一点。在这里,我主要以帝国主义经济学的一些最严重的过度行为为例来说明这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Against Scientific Imperialism
Opponents of the unity of science have generally been concerned with horizontal relations between theories, with attempts, that is, to subsume scientific accounts of complex objects under accounts of the behavior of their constituent parts. In this paper I suggest that scientific pluralism should be defended not only against this traditional physicalistic and mechanistic reductionism, but also against the imperialistic expansion of quite specialized scientific perspectives into ever wider domains of application. This tendency is particularly prevalent in scientific approaches to human behavior, and is most clearly illustrated by the imperialist aspirations of economics and evolutionary biology. Here I illustrate the problem primarily with reference to some of the worst excesses of imperialist economics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wavefunction Tails in the Modal Interpretation The History and Philosophy of Quantum Field Theory Contextualizing Science: From Science Studies to Cultural Studies Empirical and Rational Components in Scientific Confirmation In Search of a Pointless Decision Principle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1