{"title":"书写视觉历史","authors":"E. Rizzi","doi":"10.1080/13507486.2022.2132677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘new and scientifically grounded philosophies of history’ (Pamela Edwards, Chapter 11, p. 306). The final two chapters engage critically with the legacy of early modern state-of-nature theories in the present day. Tom Sparks (Chapter 13) highlights the extent to which state-ofnature theories from the early modern period still resonate in International Environmental Law, if not always in beneficial ways. Thus Sparks argues that early modern notions of nature as a resource to be exploited as well as concepts of sovereignty over territory established to prevent chaos, in the present day impede the development of international law and thus moves towards more effective environmental protection. Karl Widerquist and Grant S. McCall (Chapter 14) engage with ‘destructive myths’ derived from Hobbesian and Lockean state-of-nature theories and question the evidence on which they are based (p. 400). They challenge, for instance, widely held assumptions that ‘sovereign states and/or the liberal private property rights system benefit everyone’ or that ‘only private liberal ownership systems develop naturally’ (p. 400). Drawing on anthropological and historical evidence of actual people living in stateless societies with common or shared property, they not only disprove Hobbesian and Lockean assumptions about the state of nature, but also postulate alternative models of communal life which might provide greater freedom and equality for all. Overall, the chapters in this collection show the state of nature as a multi-faceted and versatile concept, whose origins can be traced back much further than the early modern period, and which could be used both to justify subjugation and oppression as well as quests for liberty. Informative, highly readable and generally concise, the chapters in this book can be studied individually or as a whole as useful introductions to new research. The chapters’ close engagement with a number of canonical texts in a variety of contexts also makes this collection ideal for postgraduate teaching.","PeriodicalId":151994,"journal":{"name":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing visual histories\",\"authors\":\"E. Rizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13507486.2022.2132677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘new and scientifically grounded philosophies of history’ (Pamela Edwards, Chapter 11, p. 306). The final two chapters engage critically with the legacy of early modern state-of-nature theories in the present day. Tom Sparks (Chapter 13) highlights the extent to which state-ofnature theories from the early modern period still resonate in International Environmental Law, if not always in beneficial ways. Thus Sparks argues that early modern notions of nature as a resource to be exploited as well as concepts of sovereignty over territory established to prevent chaos, in the present day impede the development of international law and thus moves towards more effective environmental protection. Karl Widerquist and Grant S. McCall (Chapter 14) engage with ‘destructive myths’ derived from Hobbesian and Lockean state-of-nature theories and question the evidence on which they are based (p. 400). They challenge, for instance, widely held assumptions that ‘sovereign states and/or the liberal private property rights system benefit everyone’ or that ‘only private liberal ownership systems develop naturally’ (p. 400). Drawing on anthropological and historical evidence of actual people living in stateless societies with common or shared property, they not only disprove Hobbesian and Lockean assumptions about the state of nature, but also postulate alternative models of communal life which might provide greater freedom and equality for all. Overall, the chapters in this collection show the state of nature as a multi-faceted and versatile concept, whose origins can be traced back much further than the early modern period, and which could be used both to justify subjugation and oppression as well as quests for liberty. Informative, highly readable and generally concise, the chapters in this book can be studied individually or as a whole as useful introductions to new research. The chapters’ close engagement with a number of canonical texts in a variety of contexts also makes this collection ideal for postgraduate teaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2022.2132677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2022.2132677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
“新的、有科学基础的历史哲学”(帕梅拉·爱德华兹,第11章,第306页)。最后两章批判性地探讨了现代早期自然状态理论的遗产。汤姆·斯帕克斯(第13章)强调了近代早期的自然状态理论在国际环境法中仍然产生共鸣的程度,如果不是总是以有益的方式。因此,斯帕克斯认为,早期的现代观念,即自然是一种可供开发的资源,以及为防止混乱而建立的领土主权概念,在今天阻碍了国际法的发展,从而阻碍了更有效的环境保护。卡尔·威德奎斯特(Karl Widerquist)和格兰特·s·麦考尔(Grant S. McCall)(第14章)探讨了源自霍布斯和洛克自然状态理论的“破坏性神话”,并质疑了这些理论所依据的证据(第400页)。例如,他们挑战了人们普遍持有的假设,即“主权国家和/或自由的私有产权制度使每个人受益”或“只有私人的自由所有权制度才能自然发展”(第400页)。根据人类学和历史证据,人们实际生活在无国家社会中,拥有共同或共有财产,他们不仅反驳了霍布斯和洛克关于自然状态的假设,而且还假设了另一种公共生活模式,这种模式可能为所有人提供更大的自由和平等。总的来说,这本合集的章节展示了自然状态作为一个多面性和多用途的概念,其起源可以追溯到比现代早期更早的时期,它既可以用来证明征服和压迫的合理性,也可以用来寻求自由。信息丰富,可读性强,总体简洁,本书中的章节可以单独研究,也可以作为一个整体,作为对新研究的有用介绍。章节的密切参与与一些规范文本在各种情况下也使这个集合理想的研究生教学。
‘new and scientifically grounded philosophies of history’ (Pamela Edwards, Chapter 11, p. 306). The final two chapters engage critically with the legacy of early modern state-of-nature theories in the present day. Tom Sparks (Chapter 13) highlights the extent to which state-ofnature theories from the early modern period still resonate in International Environmental Law, if not always in beneficial ways. Thus Sparks argues that early modern notions of nature as a resource to be exploited as well as concepts of sovereignty over territory established to prevent chaos, in the present day impede the development of international law and thus moves towards more effective environmental protection. Karl Widerquist and Grant S. McCall (Chapter 14) engage with ‘destructive myths’ derived from Hobbesian and Lockean state-of-nature theories and question the evidence on which they are based (p. 400). They challenge, for instance, widely held assumptions that ‘sovereign states and/or the liberal private property rights system benefit everyone’ or that ‘only private liberal ownership systems develop naturally’ (p. 400). Drawing on anthropological and historical evidence of actual people living in stateless societies with common or shared property, they not only disprove Hobbesian and Lockean assumptions about the state of nature, but also postulate alternative models of communal life which might provide greater freedom and equality for all. Overall, the chapters in this collection show the state of nature as a multi-faceted and versatile concept, whose origins can be traced back much further than the early modern period, and which could be used both to justify subjugation and oppression as well as quests for liberty. Informative, highly readable and generally concise, the chapters in this book can be studied individually or as a whole as useful introductions to new research. The chapters’ close engagement with a number of canonical texts in a variety of contexts also makes this collection ideal for postgraduate teaching.