审判中的适度酷刑:对以色列最高法院关于一般安全部门审讯方法合法性判决的批判性反思

A. Imseis
{"title":"审判中的适度酷刑:对以色列最高法院关于一般安全部门审讯方法合法性判决的批判性反思","authors":"A. Imseis","doi":"10.15779/Z381P9P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On September 6, 1999, the Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as the High Court of Justice (\"HCJ\"), 2 ruled on a governmental policy that has long been the subject of intense international criticism: Israel's use of torture on Palestinian detainees interrogated by its secret police, the General Security Service (\"GSS\"). 3 Since a 1987 governmental commission recommended that the GSS employ \"moderate physical and psychological pressure\" on Palestinians suspected of \"security\" offenses, the use of interrogation methods amounting to","PeriodicalId":325917,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","volume":"27 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderate Torture on Trial: Critical Reflections on the Israeli Supreme Court Judgement concerning the Legality of General Security Service Interrogation Methods\",\"authors\":\"A. Imseis\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z381P9P\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On September 6, 1999, the Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as the High Court of Justice (\\\"HCJ\\\"), 2 ruled on a governmental policy that has long been the subject of intense international criticism: Israel's use of torture on Palestinian detainees interrogated by its secret police, the General Security Service (\\\"GSS\\\"). 3 Since a 1987 governmental commission recommended that the GSS employ \\\"moderate physical and psychological pressure\\\" on Palestinians suspected of \\\"security\\\" offenses, the use of interrogation methods amounting to\",\"PeriodicalId\":325917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"27 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z381P9P\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z381P9P","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

1999年9月6日,作为高等法院的以色列最高法院(“HCJ”)就一项长期以来受到国际社会强烈批评的政府政策做出了裁决:以色列对秘密警察——国家安全局(“GSS”)审讯的巴勒斯坦被拘留者使用酷刑。自1987年政府委员会建议国安局对涉嫌“安全”罪行的巴勒斯坦人施加“适度的身体和心理压力”以来,使用的审讯方法相当于
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moderate Torture on Trial: Critical Reflections on the Israeli Supreme Court Judgement concerning the Legality of General Security Service Interrogation Methods
On September 6, 1999, the Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as the High Court of Justice ("HCJ"), 2 ruled on a governmental policy that has long been the subject of intense international criticism: Israel's use of torture on Palestinian detainees interrogated by its secret police, the General Security Service ("GSS"). 3 Since a 1987 governmental commission recommended that the GSS employ "moderate physical and psychological pressure" on Palestinians suspected of "security" offenses, the use of interrogation methods amounting to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maritime Interdiction of North Korean Ships under UN Sanctions The South China Sea as a Challenge to International Law and to International Legal Scholarship Back in the Game: International Humanitarian Lawmaking by States International Law and Corporate Participation in Times of Armed Conflict Reversing the Two Wrong Turns in the Economic Analysis of International Law: A Club Goods Theory of Treaty Membership & European Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1