{"title":"软件维护的功能点分析","authors":"Anandi Hira, B. Boehm","doi":"10.1145/2961111.2962613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Software maintenance is required to fix defects, adapt to changes in the environment, and meet new or changed user requirements. The effort of these tasks need to be estimated to track progress, manage resources, and make decisions. Most widely used cost models use source lines of code (SLOC) as the software size input measure, due to its quantifiability and high correlation with effort. Estimating the SLOC of a project is very difficult in early stages of the software lifecycle. Function Points (FPs) represents software size by functions or modifications to functions, making them easier to calculate early in the lifecycle for new development projects or maintenance tasks. Several cost estimators use FPs to estimate the SLOC of a project to take advantage of existing cost models. Goal: Through empirical analysis, the authors want to determine whether FPs can effectively estimate maintenance tasks, as a better alternative to using SLOC as a software size metric. Additionally, the authors will demonstrate that FPs to SLOC ratios add uncertainty to effort estimates. Method: The empirical analysis will be run on Unified Code Count (UCC)'s dataset, a software tool maintained by University of Southern California (USC). Results: The analyses found that separating projects adding new functions from those modifying existing functions resulted in improved estimation models using FPs. The effort estimation model for projects adding functions to UCC had high prediction accuracy statistics, but less impressive results for projects modifying existing functions in UCC. The effort estimation accuracy became unsatisfactorily low when using a FPs to SLOC ratio. Conclusions: Cost estimators should not use FPs to SLOC ratios for effort estimation due to low prediction accuracy. FPs is only an effective size measure for a portion of UCC's maintenance tasks - specifically for the projects adding new functions to UCC. Another size measure may need to be considered that might be more effective independently or in conjunction with FPs for all of UCC's maintenance tasks.","PeriodicalId":208212,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Function Point Analysis for Software Maintenance\",\"authors\":\"Anandi Hira, B. Boehm\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2961111.2962613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Software maintenance is required to fix defects, adapt to changes in the environment, and meet new or changed user requirements. The effort of these tasks need to be estimated to track progress, manage resources, and make decisions. Most widely used cost models use source lines of code (SLOC) as the software size input measure, due to its quantifiability and high correlation with effort. Estimating the SLOC of a project is very difficult in early stages of the software lifecycle. Function Points (FPs) represents software size by functions or modifications to functions, making them easier to calculate early in the lifecycle for new development projects or maintenance tasks. Several cost estimators use FPs to estimate the SLOC of a project to take advantage of existing cost models. Goal: Through empirical analysis, the authors want to determine whether FPs can effectively estimate maintenance tasks, as a better alternative to using SLOC as a software size metric. Additionally, the authors will demonstrate that FPs to SLOC ratios add uncertainty to effort estimates. Method: The empirical analysis will be run on Unified Code Count (UCC)'s dataset, a software tool maintained by University of Southern California (USC). Results: The analyses found that separating projects adding new functions from those modifying existing functions resulted in improved estimation models using FPs. The effort estimation model for projects adding functions to UCC had high prediction accuracy statistics, but less impressive results for projects modifying existing functions in UCC. The effort estimation accuracy became unsatisfactorily low when using a FPs to SLOC ratio. Conclusions: Cost estimators should not use FPs to SLOC ratios for effort estimation due to low prediction accuracy. FPs is only an effective size measure for a portion of UCC's maintenance tasks - specifically for the projects adding new functions to UCC. Another size measure may need to be considered that might be more effective independently or in conjunction with FPs for all of UCC's maintenance tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

背景:需要进行软件维护,以修复缺陷,适应环境的变化,并满足新的或变更的用户需求。需要对这些任务的工作量进行评估,以跟踪进度、管理资源和做出决策。大多数广泛使用的成本模型使用源代码行(SLOC)作为软件大小输入度量,因为它的可量化性和与工作量的高度相关性。在软件生命周期的早期阶段,评估项目的SLOC是非常困难的。功能点(FPs)通过功能或对功能的修改来表示软件大小,使它们更容易在新开发项目或维护任务的生命周期早期进行计算。一些成本估算师使用FPs来估算项目的SLOC,以利用现有的成本模型。目标:通过实证分析,作者想要确定FPs是否可以有效地评估维护任务,作为使用SLOC作为软件大小度量的更好选择。此外,作者将证明FPs与SLOC的比率增加了工作量估算的不确定性。方法:实证分析将在南加州大学(USC)维护的统一代码计数(UCC)软件工具的数据集上运行。结果:分析发现,将增加新功能的项目与修改现有功能的项目分开,可以使用FPs改进估计模型。对于向UCC中添加功能的项目,工作量估计模型具有较高的预测精度统计,但是对于修改UCC中现有功能的项目,结果不太令人印象深刻。当使用FPs / SLOC比率时,工作量估计精度变得不令人满意。结论:由于预测精度低,成本估算者不应该使用FPs与SLOC比率进行工作量估算。对于UCC的一部分维护任务来说,FPs只是一个有效的衡量尺度——特别是对于为UCC添加新功能的项目。对于UCC的所有维护任务,可能需要考虑另一种尺寸度量,它可能更有效地独立或与FPs结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Function Point Analysis for Software Maintenance
Context: Software maintenance is required to fix defects, adapt to changes in the environment, and meet new or changed user requirements. The effort of these tasks need to be estimated to track progress, manage resources, and make decisions. Most widely used cost models use source lines of code (SLOC) as the software size input measure, due to its quantifiability and high correlation with effort. Estimating the SLOC of a project is very difficult in early stages of the software lifecycle. Function Points (FPs) represents software size by functions or modifications to functions, making them easier to calculate early in the lifecycle for new development projects or maintenance tasks. Several cost estimators use FPs to estimate the SLOC of a project to take advantage of existing cost models. Goal: Through empirical analysis, the authors want to determine whether FPs can effectively estimate maintenance tasks, as a better alternative to using SLOC as a software size metric. Additionally, the authors will demonstrate that FPs to SLOC ratios add uncertainty to effort estimates. Method: The empirical analysis will be run on Unified Code Count (UCC)'s dataset, a software tool maintained by University of Southern California (USC). Results: The analyses found that separating projects adding new functions from those modifying existing functions resulted in improved estimation models using FPs. The effort estimation model for projects adding functions to UCC had high prediction accuracy statistics, but less impressive results for projects modifying existing functions in UCC. The effort estimation accuracy became unsatisfactorily low when using a FPs to SLOC ratio. Conclusions: Cost estimators should not use FPs to SLOC ratios for effort estimation due to low prediction accuracy. FPs is only an effective size measure for a portion of UCC's maintenance tasks - specifically for the projects adding new functions to UCC. Another size measure may need to be considered that might be more effective independently or in conjunction with FPs for all of UCC's maintenance tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence Briefings: Towards a Medium to Transfer Knowledge from Systematic Reviews to Practitioners The Obscure Process of Innovation Assessment: A Report of an Industrial Survey Sustainable Software Development through Overlapping Pair Rotation DIGS: A Framework for Discovering Goals for Security Requirements Engineering The Impact of Task Granularity on Co-evolution Analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1