利用多组学分析技术研究EMD335823s肝毒性的机制

Alexandra Sposny, C. Schmitt, P. Hewitt
{"title":"利用多组学分析技术研究EMD335823s肝毒性的机制","authors":"Alexandra Sposny, C. Schmitt, P. Hewitt","doi":"10.1002/9780470744307.GAT224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have used modern omics technologies (including Toxicogenomics, proteomics, metabonomics and profiling from FFPE tissues) to ascertain whether a systems biology approach would improve our understanding of the mechanism of toxicity of a compound. \n \n \n \nWistar rats were treated for up to 14 days with a non-toxic dose (15 mg kg−1) or a high dose (350 mg kg−1) of a known hepatotoxic compound (EMD 335823), chosen to ensure significant hepatotoxicity (liver necrosis, fibrosis, and bile duct necrosis/hyperplasia). \n \n \n \nGenomics, proteomics, and metabonomics identified animals with the most severe effects, in good agreement with pathological findings. Protein expression changes correlated well with gene expression changes, indicating that EMD 335823 regulated PPARα signaling. EMD 335823 is an aldose reductase inhibitor resulting in increased glucose metabolism and alterations in fatty acid metabolism. These disturbances result in lower energy resources, contributing to the pathogenesis of liver damage. Proteomics and metabonomics also showed clear separation of the most severely affected animals, although the limited numbers of molecules identified could not reveal the mechanism of toxicity alone. \n \n \n \nThe combination of omics technologies allowed a more detailed analysis and identification of potential mechanisms of action, improving the overall understanding of the compounds toxicity. Additionally, there are indications that a compound-specific signature was visible earlier, when no histopathological changes occurred. \n \n \nKeywords: \n \ncross-omics comparison; \ngenomics; \nhepatotoxicity; \nmetabonomics; \nproteomics; \nsystems toxicology","PeriodicalId":325382,"journal":{"name":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic Investigation of EMD335823s Hepatotoxicity Using Multiple Omics Profiling Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Sposny, C. Schmitt, P. Hewitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9780470744307.GAT224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have used modern omics technologies (including Toxicogenomics, proteomics, metabonomics and profiling from FFPE tissues) to ascertain whether a systems biology approach would improve our understanding of the mechanism of toxicity of a compound. \\n \\n \\n \\nWistar rats were treated for up to 14 days with a non-toxic dose (15 mg kg−1) or a high dose (350 mg kg−1) of a known hepatotoxic compound (EMD 335823), chosen to ensure significant hepatotoxicity (liver necrosis, fibrosis, and bile duct necrosis/hyperplasia). \\n \\n \\n \\nGenomics, proteomics, and metabonomics identified animals with the most severe effects, in good agreement with pathological findings. Protein expression changes correlated well with gene expression changes, indicating that EMD 335823 regulated PPARα signaling. EMD 335823 is an aldose reductase inhibitor resulting in increased glucose metabolism and alterations in fatty acid metabolism. These disturbances result in lower energy resources, contributing to the pathogenesis of liver damage. Proteomics and metabonomics also showed clear separation of the most severely affected animals, although the limited numbers of molecules identified could not reveal the mechanism of toxicity alone. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe combination of omics technologies allowed a more detailed analysis and identification of potential mechanisms of action, improving the overall understanding of the compounds toxicity. Additionally, there are indications that a compound-specific signature was visible earlier, when no histopathological changes occurred. \\n \\n \\nKeywords: \\n \\ncross-omics comparison; \\ngenomics; \\nhepatotoxicity; \\nmetabonomics; \\nproteomics; \\nsystems toxicology\",\"PeriodicalId\":325382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470744307.GAT224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470744307.GAT224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们使用了现代组学技术(包括毒理学基因组学、蛋白质组学、代谢组学和FFPE组织分析)来确定系统生物学方法是否会提高我们对化合物毒性机制的理解。Wistar大鼠用无毒剂量(15 mg kg - 1)或高剂量(350 mg kg - 1)的已知肝毒性化合物(EMD 335823)治疗长达14天,以确保显著的肝毒性(肝坏死、纤维化和胆管坏死/增生)。基因组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学鉴定出最严重影响的动物,与病理结果很好地一致。蛋白表达变化与基因表达变化具有良好的相关性,表明EMD 335823调控PPARα信号转导。EMD 335823是醛糖还原酶抑制剂,导致葡萄糖代谢增加和脂肪酸代谢改变。这些干扰导致能量资源减少,导致肝损伤的发病机制。蛋白质组学和代谢组学也显示出受影响最严重的动物的明确分离,尽管鉴定的分子数量有限,无法单独揭示毒性机制。组学技术的结合可以更详细地分析和确定潜在的作用机制,提高对化合物毒性的整体理解。此外,有迹象表明,在没有发生组织病理学变化的情况下,化合物特异性标记较早可见。关键词:跨组学比较;基因组学;肝毒性;代谢组学;蛋白质组学;系统毒理学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mechanistic Investigation of EMD335823s Hepatotoxicity Using Multiple Omics Profiling Technologies
We have used modern omics technologies (including Toxicogenomics, proteomics, metabonomics and profiling from FFPE tissues) to ascertain whether a systems biology approach would improve our understanding of the mechanism of toxicity of a compound. Wistar rats were treated for up to 14 days with a non-toxic dose (15 mg kg−1) or a high dose (350 mg kg−1) of a known hepatotoxic compound (EMD 335823), chosen to ensure significant hepatotoxicity (liver necrosis, fibrosis, and bile duct necrosis/hyperplasia). Genomics, proteomics, and metabonomics identified animals with the most severe effects, in good agreement with pathological findings. Protein expression changes correlated well with gene expression changes, indicating that EMD 335823 regulated PPARα signaling. EMD 335823 is an aldose reductase inhibitor resulting in increased glucose metabolism and alterations in fatty acid metabolism. These disturbances result in lower energy resources, contributing to the pathogenesis of liver damage. Proteomics and metabonomics also showed clear separation of the most severely affected animals, although the limited numbers of molecules identified could not reveal the mechanism of toxicity alone. The combination of omics technologies allowed a more detailed analysis and identification of potential mechanisms of action, improving the overall understanding of the compounds toxicity. Additionally, there are indications that a compound-specific signature was visible earlier, when no histopathological changes occurred. Keywords: cross-omics comparison; genomics; hepatotoxicity; metabonomics; proteomics; systems toxicology
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Community-Based Participatory Research/Translational Biomedical Research Strategy for Personalizing Nutrition, Medicine, and Healthcare Chemoinformatics and its Applications Species‐Metabolite Relation Database KNApSAcK and Its Multifaceted Retrieval System, KNApSAcK Family Application of DNA Microarray in Studies of Herbal Dietary Supplements Toxicogenomics: An Overview with Special Reference to Genetic and Genomic Approaches to the Identification of Toxic Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1