布尔域上约束问题的理想隶属度问题的复杂性

M. Mastrolilli
{"title":"布尔域上约束问题的理想隶属度问题的复杂性","authors":"M. Mastrolilli","doi":"10.1145/3449350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given an ideal I and a polynomial f the Ideal Membership Problem (IMP) is to test if f ϵ I. This problem is a fundamental algorithmic problem with important applications and notoriously intractable. We study the complexity of the IMP for combinatorial ideals that arise from constrained problems over the Boolean domain. As our main result, we identify the borderline of tractability. By using Gröbner bases techniques, we extend Schaefer’s dichotomy theorem [STOC, 1978] which classifies all Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) over the Boolean domain to be either in P or NP-hard. Moreover, our result implies necessary and sufficient conditions for the efficient computation of Theta Body Semi-Definite Programming (SDP) relaxations, identifying therefore the borderline of tractability for constraint language problems. This article is motivated by the pursuit of understanding the recently raised issue of bit complexity of Sum-of-Squares (SoS) proofs [O’Donnell, ITCS, 2017]. Raghavendra and Weitz [ICALP, 2017] show how the IMP tractability for combinatorial ideals implies bounded coefficients in SoS proofs.","PeriodicalId":154047,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complexity of the Ideal Membership Problem for Constrained Problems Over the Boolean Domain\",\"authors\":\"M. Mastrolilli\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3449350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given an ideal I and a polynomial f the Ideal Membership Problem (IMP) is to test if f ϵ I. This problem is a fundamental algorithmic problem with important applications and notoriously intractable. We study the complexity of the IMP for combinatorial ideals that arise from constrained problems over the Boolean domain. As our main result, we identify the borderline of tractability. By using Gröbner bases techniques, we extend Schaefer’s dichotomy theorem [STOC, 1978] which classifies all Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) over the Boolean domain to be either in P or NP-hard. Moreover, our result implies necessary and sufficient conditions for the efficient computation of Theta Body Semi-Definite Programming (SDP) relaxations, identifying therefore the borderline of tractability for constraint language problems. This article is motivated by the pursuit of understanding the recently raised issue of bit complexity of Sum-of-Squares (SoS) proofs [O’Donnell, ITCS, 2017]. Raghavendra and Weitz [ICALP, 2017] show how the IMP tractability for combinatorial ideals implies bounded coefficients in SoS proofs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3449350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3449350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

给定一个理想I和一个多项式f,理想隶属度问题(IMP)就是检验f是否为λ I。这个问题是一个具有重要应用的基本算法问题,也是众所周知的棘手问题。我们研究了布尔域上由约束问题产生的组合理想的IMP的复杂度。作为我们的主要结果,我们确定了可处理性的边界。通过使用Gröbner基技术,我们扩展了Schaefer的二分定理[STOC, 1978],该定理将布尔域上的所有约束满足问题(csp)分类为P或NP-hard。此外,我们的结果暗示了有效计算Theta体半确定规划(SDP)松弛的充分必要条件,从而确定了约束语言问题的可跟踪性边界。本文的动机是为了理解最近提出的平方和(so)证明的位复杂性问题[O 'Donnell, ITCS, 2017]。Raghavendra和Weitz [ICALP, 2017]展示了组合理想的IMP可跟踪性如何在SoS证明中隐含有界系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Complexity of the Ideal Membership Problem for Constrained Problems Over the Boolean Domain
Given an ideal I and a polynomial f the Ideal Membership Problem (IMP) is to test if f ϵ I. This problem is a fundamental algorithmic problem with important applications and notoriously intractable. We study the complexity of the IMP for combinatorial ideals that arise from constrained problems over the Boolean domain. As our main result, we identify the borderline of tractability. By using Gröbner bases techniques, we extend Schaefer’s dichotomy theorem [STOC, 1978] which classifies all Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) over the Boolean domain to be either in P or NP-hard. Moreover, our result implies necessary and sufficient conditions for the efficient computation of Theta Body Semi-Definite Programming (SDP) relaxations, identifying therefore the borderline of tractability for constraint language problems. This article is motivated by the pursuit of understanding the recently raised issue of bit complexity of Sum-of-Squares (SoS) proofs [O’Donnell, ITCS, 2017]. Raghavendra and Weitz [ICALP, 2017] show how the IMP tractability for combinatorial ideals implies bounded coefficients in SoS proofs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generic Techniques for Building Top-k Structures Deterministic Leader Election in Anonymous Radio Networks A Learned Approach to Design Compressed Rank/Select Data Structures k-apices of Minor-closed Graph Classes. II. Parameterized Algorithms Fully Dynamic (Δ +1)-Coloring in O(1) Update Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1