E. Clarkson, J. Denny, H. Barrett, C. Abbey, B. Gallas
{"title":"线性数字成像系统的夜空重建","authors":"E. Clarkson, J. Denny, H. Barrett, C. Abbey, B. Gallas","doi":"10.1364/srs.1998.sthc.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In tomographic and other digital imaging systems the goal is often to\n reconstruct an object function from a finite amount of noisy data\n generated by that function through a system operator. One way to\n determine the reconstructed function is to minimize the distance\n between the noiseless data vector it would generate via the system\n operator, and the data vector created through the system by the real\n object and noise. The former we will call the reconstructed data\n vector, and the latter the actual data vector. A reasonable constraint\n to place on this minimization problem is to require that the\n reconstructed function be non-negative everywhere. Different measures\n of distance in data space then result in different reconstruction\n methods. For example, the ordinary Euclidean distance results in a\n positively constrained least squares reconstruction, while the\n Kulback-Leibler distance results in a Poisson maximum likelihood\n reconstruction. In many cases though, if the reconstruction algorithm\n is continued until it converges, the end result is a reconstructed\n function that consists of many point-like structures and little else.\n These are called night-sky reconstructions, and they are usually\n avoided by stopping the reconstruction algorithm early or using\n regularization. The expectation-maximization algorithm for Poisson\n maximum likelihood reconstructions is an example of this\n situation.","PeriodicalId":184407,"journal":{"name":"Signal Recovery and Synthesis","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Night-sky reconstructions for linear digital imaging systems\",\"authors\":\"E. Clarkson, J. Denny, H. Barrett, C. Abbey, B. Gallas\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/srs.1998.sthc.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In tomographic and other digital imaging systems the goal is often to\\n reconstruct an object function from a finite amount of noisy data\\n generated by that function through a system operator. One way to\\n determine the reconstructed function is to minimize the distance\\n between the noiseless data vector it would generate via the system\\n operator, and the data vector created through the system by the real\\n object and noise. The former we will call the reconstructed data\\n vector, and the latter the actual data vector. A reasonable constraint\\n to place on this minimization problem is to require that the\\n reconstructed function be non-negative everywhere. Different measures\\n of distance in data space then result in different reconstruction\\n methods. For example, the ordinary Euclidean distance results in a\\n positively constrained least squares reconstruction, while the\\n Kulback-Leibler distance results in a Poisson maximum likelihood\\n reconstruction. In many cases though, if the reconstruction algorithm\\n is continued until it converges, the end result is a reconstructed\\n function that consists of many point-like structures and little else.\\n These are called night-sky reconstructions, and they are usually\\n avoided by stopping the reconstruction algorithm early or using\\n regularization. The expectation-maximization algorithm for Poisson\\n maximum likelihood reconstructions is an example of this\\n situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signal Recovery and Synthesis\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signal Recovery and Synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1364/srs.1998.sthc.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signal Recovery and Synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/srs.1998.sthc.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Night-sky reconstructions for linear digital imaging systems
In tomographic and other digital imaging systems the goal is often to
reconstruct an object function from a finite amount of noisy data
generated by that function through a system operator. One way to
determine the reconstructed function is to minimize the distance
between the noiseless data vector it would generate via the system
operator, and the data vector created through the system by the real
object and noise. The former we will call the reconstructed data
vector, and the latter the actual data vector. A reasonable constraint
to place on this minimization problem is to require that the
reconstructed function be non-negative everywhere. Different measures
of distance in data space then result in different reconstruction
methods. For example, the ordinary Euclidean distance results in a
positively constrained least squares reconstruction, while the
Kulback-Leibler distance results in a Poisson maximum likelihood
reconstruction. In many cases though, if the reconstruction algorithm
is continued until it converges, the end result is a reconstructed
function that consists of many point-like structures and little else.
These are called night-sky reconstructions, and they are usually
avoided by stopping the reconstruction algorithm early or using
regularization. The expectation-maximization algorithm for Poisson
maximum likelihood reconstructions is an example of this
situation.