腋窝阻滞与脊髓阻滞联合麻醉

Arsil Radiansyah, John Frans Sitepu, Luwih Bisono
{"title":"腋窝阻滞与脊髓阻滞联合麻醉","authors":"Arsil Radiansyah, John Frans Sitepu, Luwih Bisono","doi":"10.20961/soja.v2i2.59188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  Patients undergoing upper limb trauma surgery have reported various benefits of regional anesthesia over general anesthesia, including better perioperative analgesia, less opiate use, less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and a shorter post-anesthesia care period. …………………………….. Case Illustration: We reported an evaluation of 72 years old, 165 cm height and 60 kg weight male patient who was planned for open reduction and internal fixation surgery for neglected left radius ulna close fracture and left neglected tibia fibula close fracture that he was beneath follow-up for hypertension (HT), and was using antihypertensive drugs. Preoperative risk of the patient was assessed as with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) with score 3.General anesthesia would be unsafe due to geriatric issue, cardiovascular problem and delayed surgery term, we chosed to utilize combine axillary block with spinal block. we utilized USG guided infusion procedure in arrange to diminish local anesthetic dosage, and minimize error. During surgical procedure there is no hypotension, bradycardia or decreased oxygen saturation. Surgical anesthesia occurred in left hand within 20 minutes after drug delivery and 10 minutes in lower extremity. Surgery complications was not reported particularly related to vascular punction or adjacent anesthetic and nerve block applications. No complaint was detailed from the patient who was watched for 12 hours after the surgery.Conclusion: Peripheral nerve block and neuraxial block, when utilized appropriately in combination, appear be able to supplant common anesthesia within the larger part of case.","PeriodicalId":345991,"journal":{"name":"Solo Journal of Anesthesi, Pain and Critical Care (SOJA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Axillary Block with Spinal Block Anaesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Arsil Radiansyah, John Frans Sitepu, Luwih Bisono\",\"doi\":\"10.20961/soja.v2i2.59188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:  Patients undergoing upper limb trauma surgery have reported various benefits of regional anesthesia over general anesthesia, including better perioperative analgesia, less opiate use, less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and a shorter post-anesthesia care period. …………………………….. Case Illustration: We reported an evaluation of 72 years old, 165 cm height and 60 kg weight male patient who was planned for open reduction and internal fixation surgery for neglected left radius ulna close fracture and left neglected tibia fibula close fracture that he was beneath follow-up for hypertension (HT), and was using antihypertensive drugs. Preoperative risk of the patient was assessed as with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) with score 3.General anesthesia would be unsafe due to geriatric issue, cardiovascular problem and delayed surgery term, we chosed to utilize combine axillary block with spinal block. we utilized USG guided infusion procedure in arrange to diminish local anesthetic dosage, and minimize error. During surgical procedure there is no hypotension, bradycardia or decreased oxygen saturation. Surgical anesthesia occurred in left hand within 20 minutes after drug delivery and 10 minutes in lower extremity. Surgery complications was not reported particularly related to vascular punction or adjacent anesthetic and nerve block applications. No complaint was detailed from the patient who was watched for 12 hours after the surgery.Conclusion: Peripheral nerve block and neuraxial block, when utilized appropriately in combination, appear be able to supplant common anesthesia within the larger part of case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solo Journal of Anesthesi, Pain and Critical Care (SOJA)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solo Journal of Anesthesi, Pain and Critical Care (SOJA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20961/soja.v2i2.59188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solo Journal of Anesthesi, Pain and Critical Care (SOJA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/soja.v2i2.59188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受上肢创伤手术的患者报告了区域麻醉比全麻的各种好处,包括更好的围术期镇痛,更少的阿片类药物使用,更少的术后恶心和呕吐(PONV),以及更短的麻醉后护理期。...................................病例说明:我们报告了一名身高165 cm,体重60 kg的72岁男性患者,因左侧桡骨尺骨闭合性骨折和左侧胫骨腓骨闭合性骨折被忽视而计划行切开复位内固定手术,该患者因高血压(HT)未得到随访,并正在使用降压药。患者术前风险按照美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分3分进行评估。由于老年问题、心血管问题和手术期的延迟,全麻不安全,我们选择腋窝阻滞联合脊柱阻滞。我们采用USG引导输注程序,以减少局麻剂量,并尽量减少误差。手术过程中无低血压、心动过缓或血氧饱和度降低。手术麻醉在给药后20分钟内发生在左手,在给药后10分钟内发生在下肢。手术并发症没有特别与血管穿刺或邻近麻醉和神经阻滞应用有关的报道。手术后观察了12小时,患者没有详细的抱怨。结论:周围神经阻滞和轴神经阻滞在适当的情况下联合应用,在很大程度上可以替代普通麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combined Axillary Block with Spinal Block Anaesthesia
Background:  Patients undergoing upper limb trauma surgery have reported various benefits of regional anesthesia over general anesthesia, including better perioperative analgesia, less opiate use, less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and a shorter post-anesthesia care period. …………………………….. Case Illustration: We reported an evaluation of 72 years old, 165 cm height and 60 kg weight male patient who was planned for open reduction and internal fixation surgery for neglected left radius ulna close fracture and left neglected tibia fibula close fracture that he was beneath follow-up for hypertension (HT), and was using antihypertensive drugs. Preoperative risk of the patient was assessed as with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) with score 3.General anesthesia would be unsafe due to geriatric issue, cardiovascular problem and delayed surgery term, we chosed to utilize combine axillary block with spinal block. we utilized USG guided infusion procedure in arrange to diminish local anesthetic dosage, and minimize error. During surgical procedure there is no hypotension, bradycardia or decreased oxygen saturation. Surgical anesthesia occurred in left hand within 20 minutes after drug delivery and 10 minutes in lower extremity. Surgery complications was not reported particularly related to vascular punction or adjacent anesthetic and nerve block applications. No complaint was detailed from the patient who was watched for 12 hours after the surgery.Conclusion: Peripheral nerve block and neuraxial block, when utilized appropriately in combination, appear be able to supplant common anesthesia within the larger part of case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Technical Approach to Anesthesia in the Case of Tonsillectomy Outcome Comparison Between Insulin-Dependent and Non Insulin-Dependent Patients after Open Adult Cardiac Surgery A Meta-Analysis of 80% Fraction of Inspired Oxygen on Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Surgery Comparison Between Norepinephrine-Epinephrine and Norepinephrine-Vasopressin Effectiveness in Reducing Mortality in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review Permissive Hypotension Strategy in Open-surgery of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1