多瑙河下游北部的亚姆纳亚影响:一个关于新来者和当地人的故事

Bianca Preda-Bălănică, A. Frînculeasa, V. Heyd
{"title":"多瑙河下游北部的亚姆纳亚影响:一个关于新来者和当地人的故事","authors":"Bianca Preda-Bălănică, A. Frînculeasa, V. Heyd","doi":"10.3406/bspf.2020.15079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to provide an overview of the current understanding in Yamnaya burials from north of the Lower Danube, particularly focussing on their relationship with supposed local archaeological cultures/societies. Departing from a decades-long research history and latest archaeological finds from Romania, it addresses key research basics on the funerary archaeology of their kurgans and burials; their material culture and chronology; on steppe predecessors and Katakombnaya successors; and links with neighbouring regions as well as the wider southeast European context. Taking into account some reflections from latest ancient DNA revelations, there can be no doubt a substantial migration has taken place around 3000 BC, with Yamnaya populations originating from the Caspian-Pontic steppe pushing westwards. However already the question if such accounts for the term of ’Mass Migrations’ cannot be satisfactorily answered, as we are only about to begin to understand the demographics in this process. A further complication is trying to assess who is a newcomer and who is a local in an interaction scenario that lasts for c. 500 years. Identities are not fixed, may indeed transform, as previous newcomers soon turn into locals, while others are just visitors. Nevertheless, this well-researched region of geographical transition from lowland eastern Europe to the hillier parts of temperate Europe provides an ideal starting point to address such questions, being currently also at the heart of the intense discussion about what is identity in the context of the emerging relationship of Archaeology and Genetics.","PeriodicalId":375388,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Yamnaya Impact North of the Lower Danube: A Tale of Newcomers and Locals\",\"authors\":\"Bianca Preda-Bălănică, A. Frînculeasa, V. Heyd\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/bspf.2020.15079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to provide an overview of the current understanding in Yamnaya burials from north of the Lower Danube, particularly focussing on their relationship with supposed local archaeological cultures/societies. Departing from a decades-long research history and latest archaeological finds from Romania, it addresses key research basics on the funerary archaeology of their kurgans and burials; their material culture and chronology; on steppe predecessors and Katakombnaya successors; and links with neighbouring regions as well as the wider southeast European context. Taking into account some reflections from latest ancient DNA revelations, there can be no doubt a substantial migration has taken place around 3000 BC, with Yamnaya populations originating from the Caspian-Pontic steppe pushing westwards. However already the question if such accounts for the term of ’Mass Migrations’ cannot be satisfactorily answered, as we are only about to begin to understand the demographics in this process. A further complication is trying to assess who is a newcomer and who is a local in an interaction scenario that lasts for c. 500 years. Identities are not fixed, may indeed transform, as previous newcomers soon turn into locals, while others are just visitors. Nevertheless, this well-researched region of geographical transition from lowland eastern Europe to the hillier parts of temperate Europe provides an ideal starting point to address such questions, being currently also at the heart of the intense discussion about what is identity in the context of the emerging relationship of Archaeology and Genetics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2020.15079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2020.15079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文旨在概述目前对多瑙河下游北部扬纳亚墓葬的理解,特别关注它们与当地考古文化/社会的关系。从罗马尼亚长达数十年的研究历史和最新的考古发现出发,它解决了他们的库尔干和埋葬的丧葬考古学的关键研究基础;他们的物质文化和年代;关于草原前辈和Katakombnaya接班人;并与邻近地区以及更广泛的东南欧地区建立联系。考虑到最新的古代DNA揭示的一些反映,毫无疑问,公元前3000年左右发生了大规模的迁徙,亚姆纳亚人来自里海-庞蒂克草原,向西推进。然而,“大规模移民”这一术语是否有这样的解释,这个问题还不能令人满意地回答,因为我们在这个过程中才刚刚开始了解人口统计学。一个更复杂的问题是,在一个持续了大约500年的互动场景中,试图评估谁是新来者,谁是当地人。身份不是固定的,甚至可能会发生变化,因为以前的新来者很快就变成了当地人,而其他人只是游客。尽管如此,这个从东欧低地到温带欧洲丘陵地区的地理过渡地区的研究很充分,为解决这些问题提供了一个理想的起点,目前也是考古学和遗传学新兴关系背景下关于什么是身份的激烈讨论的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Yamnaya Impact North of the Lower Danube: A Tale of Newcomers and Locals
This paper aims to provide an overview of the current understanding in Yamnaya burials from north of the Lower Danube, particularly focussing on their relationship with supposed local archaeological cultures/societies. Departing from a decades-long research history and latest archaeological finds from Romania, it addresses key research basics on the funerary archaeology of their kurgans and burials; their material culture and chronology; on steppe predecessors and Katakombnaya successors; and links with neighbouring regions as well as the wider southeast European context. Taking into account some reflections from latest ancient DNA revelations, there can be no doubt a substantial migration has taken place around 3000 BC, with Yamnaya populations originating from the Caspian-Pontic steppe pushing westwards. However already the question if such accounts for the term of ’Mass Migrations’ cannot be satisfactorily answered, as we are only about to begin to understand the demographics in this process. A further complication is trying to assess who is a newcomer and who is a local in an interaction scenario that lasts for c. 500 years. Identities are not fixed, may indeed transform, as previous newcomers soon turn into locals, while others are just visitors. Nevertheless, this well-researched region of geographical transition from lowland eastern Europe to the hillier parts of temperate Europe provides an ideal starting point to address such questions, being currently also at the heart of the intense discussion about what is identity in the context of the emerging relationship of Archaeology and Genetics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La roche gravée du vallon du Haut-Couletta (Fontan, Alpes-Maritimes) Les stèles anthropomorphes de la Bastidonne (Trets, Bouches-du-Rhône) et leur contexte du Néolithique moyen Diversité technique des débitages laminaires au Néolithique ancien à Vaux-et-Borset (Hesbaye, Belgique) : manières de faire, problèmes d’interprétation et perspectives anthropologiques Découverte d’une grande stèle anthropomorphe gravée en Île-de-France orientale (la Grande Maison, Chamigny, Seine-et-Marne) De nouvelles dates 14C pour la faune pléistocène du gouffre d’Habarra (Arudy, Pyrénées-Atlantiques)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1