Amreeta Chatterjee, M. Guizani, Catherine Stevens, Jillian Emard, Mary Evelyn May, M. Burnett, Iftekhar Ahmed, A. Sarma
{"title":"AID: OSS项目页面中性别包容性错误的自动检测器","authors":"Amreeta Chatterjee, M. Guizani, Catherine Stevens, Jillian Emard, Mary Evelyn May, M. Burnett, Iftekhar Ahmed, A. Sarma","doi":"10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tools and infrastructure used in tech, including Open Source Software (OSS), can embed \"inclusivity bugs\"- features that disproportionately disadvantage particular groups of contributors. To see whether OSS developers have existing practices to ward off such bugs, we surveyed 266 OSS developers. Our results show that a majority (77%) of developers do not use any inclusivity practices, and 92% of respondents cited a lack of concrete resources to enable them to do so. To help fill this gap, this paper introduces AID, a tool that automates the GenderMag method to systematically find gender-inclusivity bugs in software. We then present the results of the tool's evaluation on 20 GitHub projects. The tool achieved precision of 0.69, recall of 0.92, an F-measure of 0.79 and even captured some inclusivity bugs that human GenderMag teams missed.","PeriodicalId":305167,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AID: An Automated Detector for Gender-Inclusivity Bugs in OSS Project Pages\",\"authors\":\"Amreeta Chatterjee, M. Guizani, Catherine Stevens, Jillian Emard, Mary Evelyn May, M. Burnett, Iftekhar Ahmed, A. Sarma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tools and infrastructure used in tech, including Open Source Software (OSS), can embed \\\"inclusivity bugs\\\"- features that disproportionately disadvantage particular groups of contributors. To see whether OSS developers have existing practices to ward off such bugs, we surveyed 266 OSS developers. Our results show that a majority (77%) of developers do not use any inclusivity practices, and 92% of respondents cited a lack of concrete resources to enable them to do so. To help fill this gap, this paper introduces AID, a tool that automates the GenderMag method to systematically find gender-inclusivity bugs in software. We then present the results of the tool's evaluation on 20 GitHub projects. The tool achieved precision of 0.69, recall of 0.92, an F-measure of 0.79 and even captured some inclusivity bugs that human GenderMag teams missed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
AID: An Automated Detector for Gender-Inclusivity Bugs in OSS Project Pages
The tools and infrastructure used in tech, including Open Source Software (OSS), can embed "inclusivity bugs"- features that disproportionately disadvantage particular groups of contributors. To see whether OSS developers have existing practices to ward off such bugs, we surveyed 266 OSS developers. Our results show that a majority (77%) of developers do not use any inclusivity practices, and 92% of respondents cited a lack of concrete resources to enable them to do so. To help fill this gap, this paper introduces AID, a tool that automates the GenderMag method to systematically find gender-inclusivity bugs in software. We then present the results of the tool's evaluation on 20 GitHub projects. The tool achieved precision of 0.69, recall of 0.92, an F-measure of 0.79 and even captured some inclusivity bugs that human GenderMag teams missed.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
