优质护理和患者安全:医疗错误披露的最佳实践模型

J. Kalra, Zoher Rafid-Hamed, Chiamaka Okonkwo, Patrick J Seitzinger
{"title":"优质护理和患者安全:医疗错误披露的最佳实践模型","authors":"J. Kalra, Zoher Rafid-Hamed, Chiamaka Okonkwo, Patrick J Seitzinger","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over recent years, adverse events and medical errors have become topics of increased concern in health care. Despite the efforts of healthcare organizations and providers to prevent medical errors and adverse events, medical errors are still inevitable. Disclosure of an adverse event is essential in managing a medical error's consequences. We have previously reviewed disclosure policies at the provincial level and found no uniform approach to disclosure in Canada. Effective communication between healthcare providers, patients, and their families throughout the disclosure process is vital in supporting and fostering the physician-patient relationship. Given the variability of medical error disclosure policies, comparing the disclosure process between different health authorities may allow us to better understand the best practice model given the proper parameters. Disclosure policies can provide a framework and guidelines for appropriate disclosure, leading to more transparent practices. The purpose of this study is to review and compare the disclosure policies implemented by individual health authorities across Canada. We will evaluate each policy based on the inclusion of the following key points: avoidance of blame; support to the staff; an apology or expression of regret; avoidance of speculation; some form of patient support; education/training to healthcare workers; immediate disclosure; team-based approach; accessibility; and documentation. The clinical significance of the study is to find similarities and differences between various health regions' policies of disclosure as well as report the best practice model for medical error disclosure across Canada. We suggest implementing a uniform national policy that addresses errors in a non-punitive manner and respects the patient's right to an honest disclosure. A prime role exists for the accrediting and regulatory authorities to initiate policy changes and appropriate reforms in the area. Not only should disclosing medical errors be a routine part of medical care to enhance quality improvement, but it would also protect patients' health and autonomy.","PeriodicalId":389399,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare and Medical Devices","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Care and Patient Safety: A Best Practice Model for Medical Error Disclosure\",\"authors\":\"J. Kalra, Zoher Rafid-Hamed, Chiamaka Okonkwo, Patrick J Seitzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1003478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over recent years, adverse events and medical errors have become topics of increased concern in health care. Despite the efforts of healthcare organizations and providers to prevent medical errors and adverse events, medical errors are still inevitable. Disclosure of an adverse event is essential in managing a medical error's consequences. We have previously reviewed disclosure policies at the provincial level and found no uniform approach to disclosure in Canada. Effective communication between healthcare providers, patients, and their families throughout the disclosure process is vital in supporting and fostering the physician-patient relationship. Given the variability of medical error disclosure policies, comparing the disclosure process between different health authorities may allow us to better understand the best practice model given the proper parameters. Disclosure policies can provide a framework and guidelines for appropriate disclosure, leading to more transparent practices. The purpose of this study is to review and compare the disclosure policies implemented by individual health authorities across Canada. We will evaluate each policy based on the inclusion of the following key points: avoidance of blame; support to the staff; an apology or expression of regret; avoidance of speculation; some form of patient support; education/training to healthcare workers; immediate disclosure; team-based approach; accessibility; and documentation. The clinical significance of the study is to find similarities and differences between various health regions' policies of disclosure as well as report the best practice model for medical error disclosure across Canada. We suggest implementing a uniform national policy that addresses errors in a non-punitive manner and respects the patient's right to an honest disclosure. A prime role exists for the accrediting and regulatory authorities to initiate policy changes and appropriate reforms in the area. Not only should disclosing medical errors be a routine part of medical care to enhance quality improvement, but it would also protect patients' health and autonomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":389399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare and Medical Devices\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare and Medical Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare and Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,不良事件和医疗差错已成为卫生保健日益关注的话题。尽管医疗保健组织和提供者努力防止医疗错误和不良事件,但医疗错误仍然不可避免。披露不良事件对于管理医疗差错的后果至关重要。我们之前审查了各省的披露政策,发现加拿大没有统一的披露方法。在整个披露过程中,医疗保健提供者、患者及其家属之间的有效沟通对于支持和促进医患关系至关重要。鉴于医疗差错披露政策的可变性,比较不同卫生当局之间的披露过程可能使我们能够更好地理解给定适当参数的最佳实践模型。披露政策可以为适当的披露提供框架和指导方针,从而使实践更加透明。本研究的目的是审查和比较加拿大各地卫生当局实施的信息披露政策。我们将根据以下要点来评估每项政策:避免责任;对员工的支持;道歉:道歉或表示遗憾;避免投机;某种形式的病人支持;对保健工作者进行教育/培训;及时披露;以团队为基础的方法;可访问性;和文档。本研究的临床意义在于发现各卫生地区医疗差错披露政策的异同,并报告加拿大各地医疗差错披露的最佳实践模式。我们建议实施统一的国家政策,以非惩罚性的方式解决错误,并尊重患者诚实披露的权利。认证和管理当局的主要作用是发起该领域的政策变化和适当改革。披露医疗差错不仅应该成为医疗保健的常规部分,以提高质量,而且还可以保护患者的健康和自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality Care and Patient Safety: A Best Practice Model for Medical Error Disclosure
Over recent years, adverse events and medical errors have become topics of increased concern in health care. Despite the efforts of healthcare organizations and providers to prevent medical errors and adverse events, medical errors are still inevitable. Disclosure of an adverse event is essential in managing a medical error's consequences. We have previously reviewed disclosure policies at the provincial level and found no uniform approach to disclosure in Canada. Effective communication between healthcare providers, patients, and their families throughout the disclosure process is vital in supporting and fostering the physician-patient relationship. Given the variability of medical error disclosure policies, comparing the disclosure process between different health authorities may allow us to better understand the best practice model given the proper parameters. Disclosure policies can provide a framework and guidelines for appropriate disclosure, leading to more transparent practices. The purpose of this study is to review and compare the disclosure policies implemented by individual health authorities across Canada. We will evaluate each policy based on the inclusion of the following key points: avoidance of blame; support to the staff; an apology or expression of regret; avoidance of speculation; some form of patient support; education/training to healthcare workers; immediate disclosure; team-based approach; accessibility; and documentation. The clinical significance of the study is to find similarities and differences between various health regions' policies of disclosure as well as report the best practice model for medical error disclosure across Canada. We suggest implementing a uniform national policy that addresses errors in a non-punitive manner and respects the patient's right to an honest disclosure. A prime role exists for the accrediting and regulatory authorities to initiate policy changes and appropriate reforms in the area. Not only should disclosing medical errors be a routine part of medical care to enhance quality improvement, but it would also protect patients' health and autonomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying User Interface Profiles to Ensure Safe Remote Control within the Open Networked Operating Room in accordance with ISO IEEE 11073 SDC AR-Coach: Using Augmented Reality (AR) for Real-Time Clinical Guidance During Medical Emergencies on Deep Space Exploration Missions Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: The Explainability Ethical Paradox Hypothesis on the supreme value criteria of the global civilization Preliminary wear trial of anisotropic textile brace designed for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1