自动Bug报告总结器是否没有达到目标?

J. Anvik, Akalanka Galappaththi
{"title":"自动Bug报告总结器是否没有达到目标?","authors":"J. Anvik, Akalanka Galappaththi","doi":"10.1145/3387940.3392236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bug reports can be lengthy due to long descriptions and long conversation threads. Automatic summarization of the text in a bug report can reduce the time spent by software project members on understanding the content of a bug report. Quality of the bug report summaries have been historically evaluated using human-created gold-standard summaries. However, we believe this is not a good practice for two reasons. First, we observed high disagreement levels in the annotated summaries and the number of annotators to create gold-standard summaries was lower than the established value for stable annotation. We believe that creating a fixed summary length of 25% of the word count of the corresponding bug report is not suitable for every time when a person refers to a bug report. Therefore, we propose an automatic sentence annotation method and an interface to customize the presented summary.","PeriodicalId":309659,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Automatic Bug Report Summarizers Missing the Target?\",\"authors\":\"J. Anvik, Akalanka Galappaththi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3387940.3392236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bug reports can be lengthy due to long descriptions and long conversation threads. Automatic summarization of the text in a bug report can reduce the time spent by software project members on understanding the content of a bug report. Quality of the bug report summaries have been historically evaluated using human-created gold-standard summaries. However, we believe this is not a good practice for two reasons. First, we observed high disagreement levels in the annotated summaries and the number of annotators to create gold-standard summaries was lower than the established value for stable annotation. We believe that creating a fixed summary length of 25% of the word count of the corresponding bug report is not suitable for every time when a person refers to a bug report. Therefore, we propose an automatic sentence annotation method and an interface to customize the presented summary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3392236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3392236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于冗长的描述和冗长的对话线程,Bug报告可能会很冗长。错误报告中文本的自动摘要可以减少软件项目成员花在理解错误报告内容上的时间。bug报告摘要的质量已经使用人工创建的黄金标准摘要进行了历史评估。然而,我们认为这不是一个好的做法,原因有二。首先,我们观察到注释摘要的分歧程度很高,并且创建金标准摘要的注释者数量低于稳定注释的既定值。我们认为,当一个人每次提到错误报告时,创建一个固定长度为相应错误报告字数25%的摘要并不适合。因此,我们提出了一种句子自动标注方法和一个自定义呈现摘要的接口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are Automatic Bug Report Summarizers Missing the Target?
Bug reports can be lengthy due to long descriptions and long conversation threads. Automatic summarization of the text in a bug report can reduce the time spent by software project members on understanding the content of a bug report. Quality of the bug report summaries have been historically evaluated using human-created gold-standard summaries. However, we believe this is not a good practice for two reasons. First, we observed high disagreement levels in the annotated summaries and the number of annotators to create gold-standard summaries was lower than the established value for stable annotation. We believe that creating a fixed summary length of 25% of the word count of the corresponding bug report is not suitable for every time when a person refers to a bug report. Therefore, we propose an automatic sentence annotation method and an interface to customize the presented summary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Preliminary Systematic Mapping on Software Engineering for Robotic Systems: A Software Quality Perspective Generating API Test Data Using Deep Reinforcement Learning Human Factors in the Study of Automatic Software Repair: Future Directions for Research with Industry Strategies for Crowdworkers to Overcome Barriers in Competition-based Software Crowdsourcing Development Centralized Generic Interfaces in Hardware/Software Co-design for AI Accelerators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1