美国政府机构对人的生命的货币价值的经济调查

J. Silny, R. Little, D. S. Remer
{"title":"美国政府机构对人的生命的货币价值的经济调查","authors":"J. Silny, R. Little, D. S. Remer","doi":"10.1080/1941658X.2010.10462226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents the methods used by U.S. government agencies to assign a monetary value to human life as mandated by three Executive Orders. Since 1978, all regulations with an impact greater than $100 million require a supporting analysis. By accounting for inflation over the past 28 years, this threshold has effectively been reduced by 2.5 to 3.0 times in real dollars. Monetary values assigned to a life directly impact the approval of government proposed projects through cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. Two major methods are used to determine the value of a life. First, the value of a statistical life emphasizes that monetary value is not directly placed on life but rather on methodologies to prevent the statistical loss of life. Second, willingness to pay is the monetary value that an individual would pay to prevent the loss of their life. Previous works cite values of life ranging from $0.1 to $86.8 million (in year 2006 dollars U.S.). The values of a human life used by U.S. government agencies have significantly changed over time. The values used by government agencies in 2006 are as follows: the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration — $3.0 million, the Environmental Protection Agency — $6.1 million, the Food and Drug Administration — $6.5 million, and the Consumer Products Safety Commission—$5.0 million. We believe that a single value should be used across all U.S. government agencies to provide consistency and fairness. We also believe that the $100 million minimum regulation threshold should be increased to account for inflation.","PeriodicalId":390877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics","volume":"2 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Survey of the Monetary Value Placed on Human Life by Government Agencies in the United States of America\",\"authors\":\"J. Silny, R. Little, D. S. Remer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1941658X.2010.10462226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article presents the methods used by U.S. government agencies to assign a monetary value to human life as mandated by three Executive Orders. Since 1978, all regulations with an impact greater than $100 million require a supporting analysis. By accounting for inflation over the past 28 years, this threshold has effectively been reduced by 2.5 to 3.0 times in real dollars. Monetary values assigned to a life directly impact the approval of government proposed projects through cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. Two major methods are used to determine the value of a life. First, the value of a statistical life emphasizes that monetary value is not directly placed on life but rather on methodologies to prevent the statistical loss of life. Second, willingness to pay is the monetary value that an individual would pay to prevent the loss of their life. Previous works cite values of life ranging from $0.1 to $86.8 million (in year 2006 dollars U.S.). The values of a human life used by U.S. government agencies have significantly changed over time. The values used by government agencies in 2006 are as follows: the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration — $3.0 million, the Environmental Protection Agency — $6.1 million, the Food and Drug Administration — $6.5 million, and the Consumer Products Safety Commission—$5.0 million. We believe that a single value should be used across all U.S. government agencies to provide consistency and fairness. We also believe that the $100 million minimum regulation threshold should be increased to account for inflation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics\",\"volume\":\"2 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1941658X.2010.10462226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1941658X.2010.10462226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要:本文介绍了美国政府机构根据三个行政命令的规定,为人类生命分配货币价值的方法。自1978年以来,所有影响超过1亿美元的法规都需要进行支持性分析。考虑到过去28年的通货膨胀,以实际美元计算,这一门槛实际上降低了2.5至3.0倍。通过成本效益和成本效益分析,分配给生命的货币价值直接影响政府拟议项目的批准。确定生命价值的主要方法有两种。首先,统计生命的价值强调,货币价值不是直接放在生命上,而是放在防止统计生命损失的方法上。第二,支付意愿是指个人为防止丧失生命而愿意支付的货币价值。之前的作品中所引用的生命价值从10万美元到8680万美元不等(以2006年的美元计算)。随着时间的推移,美国政府机构使用的人的生命价值发生了重大变化。政府机构在2006年使用的价值如下:运输部和联邦航空管理局- 300万美元,环境保护局- 610万美元,食品和药物管理局- 650万美元,消费者产品安全委员会- 500万美元。我们认为,应该在所有美国政府机构中使用单一的价值观,以提供一致性和公平性。我们还认为,应提高1亿美元的最低监管门槛,以考虑到通货膨胀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic Survey of the Monetary Value Placed on Human Life by Government Agencies in the United States of America
Abstract This article presents the methods used by U.S. government agencies to assign a monetary value to human life as mandated by three Executive Orders. Since 1978, all regulations with an impact greater than $100 million require a supporting analysis. By accounting for inflation over the past 28 years, this threshold has effectively been reduced by 2.5 to 3.0 times in real dollars. Monetary values assigned to a life directly impact the approval of government proposed projects through cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. Two major methods are used to determine the value of a life. First, the value of a statistical life emphasizes that monetary value is not directly placed on life but rather on methodologies to prevent the statistical loss of life. Second, willingness to pay is the monetary value that an individual would pay to prevent the loss of their life. Previous works cite values of life ranging from $0.1 to $86.8 million (in year 2006 dollars U.S.). The values of a human life used by U.S. government agencies have significantly changed over time. The values used by government agencies in 2006 are as follows: the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration — $3.0 million, the Environmental Protection Agency — $6.1 million, the Food and Drug Administration — $6.5 million, and the Consumer Products Safety Commission—$5.0 million. We believe that a single value should be used across all U.S. government agencies to provide consistency and fairness. We also believe that the $100 million minimum regulation threshold should be increased to account for inflation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board EOV Multiproduct Cost-Volume-Profit Model: A Resource Reallocation Approach for Decision Making Dynamics of New Building Construction Costs: Implications for Forecasting Escalation Allowances Balancing Expert Opinion and Historical Data: The Case of Baseball Umpires Using Robust Statistical Methodology to Evaluate the Cost Performance of Project Delivery Systems: A Case Study of Horizontal Construction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1