光伏泵系统的P&O或IC:哪种MPPT算法可以提高性能?

A. Harrag, Abdessalem Titraoui, H. Bahri
{"title":"光伏泵系统的P&O或IC:哪种MPPT算法可以提高性能?","authors":"A. Harrag, Abdessalem Titraoui, H. Bahri","doi":"10.1109/ICOSC.2017.7958724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the performance improvement of photovoltaic water pumping system using both P&O and IC MPPT controllers. The efficiency of both proposed MPPT controller has been studied successfully using a DC motor-pump powered by thirty six PV modules fed by DC-DC boost converter controlled using both P&O as well as IC MPPT algorithms. Comparative study results obtained using Matlab/Simulink environment show that the IC outperforms the P&O method in term of convergence speed; while the P&O method presents better performance for the steady state oscillation in case of high level insolation. In case of low level insolation (point C), the steady state oscillations around the MPP point are less in IC compared to those in P&O algorithm.","PeriodicalId":113395,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P&O or IC for PV pumping system: What MPPT algorithm to improve performances?\",\"authors\":\"A. Harrag, Abdessalem Titraoui, H. Bahri\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICOSC.2017.7958724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the performance improvement of photovoltaic water pumping system using both P&O and IC MPPT controllers. The efficiency of both proposed MPPT controller has been studied successfully using a DC motor-pump powered by thirty six PV modules fed by DC-DC boost converter controlled using both P&O as well as IC MPPT algorithms. Comparative study results obtained using Matlab/Simulink environment show that the IC outperforms the P&O method in term of convergence speed; while the P&O method presents better performance for the steady state oscillation in case of high level insolation. In case of low level insolation (point C), the steady state oscillations around the MPP point are less in IC compared to those in P&O algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSC.2017.7958724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSC.2017.7958724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本文讨论了采用P&O和IC MPPT两种控制器对光伏水泵系统的性能改进。采用采用P&O和IC MPPT算法控制的DC-DC升压转换器驱动的36个光伏模块驱动的直流电机泵,成功地研究了这两种MPPT控制器的效率。在Matlab/Simulink环境下的对比研究结果表明,该集成电路在收敛速度上优于P&O方法;而P&O法在高日照条件下对稳态振荡有较好的处理效果。在低日照(C点)情况下,IC算法在MPP点附近的稳态振荡比P&O算法少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P&O or IC for PV pumping system: What MPPT algorithm to improve performances?
This paper discusses the performance improvement of photovoltaic water pumping system using both P&O and IC MPPT controllers. The efficiency of both proposed MPPT controller has been studied successfully using a DC motor-pump powered by thirty six PV modules fed by DC-DC boost converter controlled using both P&O as well as IC MPPT algorithms. Comparative study results obtained using Matlab/Simulink environment show that the IC outperforms the P&O method in term of convergence speed; while the P&O method presents better performance for the steady state oscillation in case of high level insolation. In case of low level insolation (point C), the steady state oscillations around the MPP point are less in IC compared to those in P&O algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart Home, Smart HEMS, Smart heating: An overview of the latest products and trends ℋ∞ observer-based stabilization of switched discrete-time linear systems FLC based Gaussian membership functions tuned by PSO and GA for MPPT of photovoltaic system: A comparative study A modified two-step LMI method to design observer-based controller for linear discrete-time systems with parameter uncertainties Adaptive Linear Energy Detector based on onset and offset electromyography activity detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1