损失与费用

Adrian Hughes QC, Gethin Thomas
{"title":"损失与费用","authors":"Adrian Hughes QC, Gethin Thomas","doi":"10.4324/9781315758398-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter identifies standard forms and bespoke forms of contract that provide a mechanism whereby the employer can order changes to the work to be done. It discusses the power to order varied work that is used frequently by employers who have often not had all their requirements sorted out at the time of the letting of the contract. It also distinguishes limitations upon the employer’s right to vary the work pursuant to a normal variation clause, such as the limitation in which the change ordered cannot alter the essential characteristic of the contract itself. This chapter covers the limitation in which the employer may not order the omission of work simply in order to instruct another contractor to do the same or almost the same work. It describes claims for sums due under the contract that are dealt with non-contentiously.","PeriodicalId":296429,"journal":{"name":"Wilmot-Smith on Construction Contracts","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loss and Expense\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Hughes QC, Gethin Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315758398-20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter identifies standard forms and bespoke forms of contract that provide a mechanism whereby the employer can order changes to the work to be done. It discusses the power to order varied work that is used frequently by employers who have often not had all their requirements sorted out at the time of the letting of the contract. It also distinguishes limitations upon the employer’s right to vary the work pursuant to a normal variation clause, such as the limitation in which the change ordered cannot alter the essential characteristic of the contract itself. This chapter covers the limitation in which the employer may not order the omission of work simply in order to instruct another contractor to do the same or almost the same work. It describes claims for sums due under the contract that are dealt with non-contentiously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wilmot-Smith on Construction Contracts\",\"volume\":\"202 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wilmot-Smith on Construction Contracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758398-20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilmot-Smith on Construction Contracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758398-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章确定了标准形式和定制形式的合同,这些合同提供了一种机制,雇主可以借此命令更改要完成的工作。它讨论了雇主经常使用的订购各种工作的权力,这些雇主在租赁合同时往往没有整理好所有的要求。它还区分了对雇主根据正常的变更条款改变工作的权利的限制,例如所要求的变更不能改变合同本身的基本特征的限制。本章涵盖了雇主不得仅仅为了指示另一承包商做同样或几乎同样的工作而命令遗漏工作的限制。它描述了对合同项下应付款项的无争议处理的索赔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Loss and Expense
This chapter identifies standard forms and bespoke forms of contract that provide a mechanism whereby the employer can order changes to the work to be done. It discusses the power to order varied work that is used frequently by employers who have often not had all their requirements sorted out at the time of the letting of the contract. It also distinguishes limitations upon the employer’s right to vary the work pursuant to a normal variation clause, such as the limitation in which the change ordered cannot alter the essential characteristic of the contract itself. This chapter covers the limitation in which the employer may not order the omission of work simply in order to instruct another contractor to do the same or almost the same work. It describes claims for sums due under the contract that are dealt with non-contentiously.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Injunctions and Specific Performance Contracts: Formation and Interpretation Damages for Breach of Contract Determination or Forfeiture Clauses International Construction Arbitration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1