监管制度与中国对外直接投资:实证研究

V. Z. Chen, Yuanyuan Li, S. Hambright
{"title":"监管制度与中国对外直接投资:实证研究","authors":"V. Z. Chen, Yuanyuan Li, S. Hambright","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2551236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper seeks to review the effects of home regulatory institutions on outward FDI (OFDI) in the context of China and discuss the extent to which they can be extended to other emerging markets. We especially compare these empirical studies with theoretical discussions in each category, identify research gaps, and suggest future research ideas. Practical implications are discussed. Design/methodology/approach: It focuses specifically on three categories of regulatory institutions, including overall institutional development, liberalization of OFDI policies, and state ownership (and its closely approximate forms). Using a systematic review, this paper has reviewed 26 empirical studies (23 quantitative and 3 qualitative studies) published in peer-reviewed journals. Findings: These studies suggest that overall institutional development towards a market economy in general leads to increased OFDI, but this effect is contingent on the stage of such development and the capabilities of Chinese multinationals. Liberalized and supportive OFDI policies also facilitate OFDI activities, but only into selective areas. Findings on state ownership have been mixed. Originality/value: This review offers a full picture of empirical evidence on how multiple levels of regulatory institutions affect OFDI from China. In this way, we can identify the research gaps between theoretical discussions on home institutions and OFDI and empirical evidence. Thus we make suggestions for future directions of studies.","PeriodicalId":108284,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: International Financial Markets - Emerging Markets eJournal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulatory Institutions and Chinese Outward FDI: An Empirical Review\",\"authors\":\"V. Z. Chen, Yuanyuan Li, S. Hambright\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2551236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This paper seeks to review the effects of home regulatory institutions on outward FDI (OFDI) in the context of China and discuss the extent to which they can be extended to other emerging markets. We especially compare these empirical studies with theoretical discussions in each category, identify research gaps, and suggest future research ideas. Practical implications are discussed. Design/methodology/approach: It focuses specifically on three categories of regulatory institutions, including overall institutional development, liberalization of OFDI policies, and state ownership (and its closely approximate forms). Using a systematic review, this paper has reviewed 26 empirical studies (23 quantitative and 3 qualitative studies) published in peer-reviewed journals. Findings: These studies suggest that overall institutional development towards a market economy in general leads to increased OFDI, but this effect is contingent on the stage of such development and the capabilities of Chinese multinationals. Liberalized and supportive OFDI policies also facilitate OFDI activities, but only into selective areas. Findings on state ownership have been mixed. Originality/value: This review offers a full picture of empirical evidence on how multiple levels of regulatory institutions affect OFDI from China. In this way, we can identify the research gaps between theoretical discussions on home institutions and OFDI and empirical evidence. Thus we make suggestions for future directions of studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: International Financial Markets - Emerging Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: International Financial Markets - Emerging Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2551236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: International Financial Markets - Emerging Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2551236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

目的:本文旨在回顾国内监管机构在中国背景下对对外直接投资(OFDI)的影响,并讨论它们在多大程度上可以扩展到其他新兴市场。我们特别将这些实证研究与每个类别的理论讨论进行比较,找出研究差距,并提出未来的研究思路。讨论了实际意义。设计/方法/方法:它特别关注三类监管机构,包括总体制度发展、对外直接投资政策自由化和国有(及其近似形式)。本文采用系统综述的方法,对发表在同行评议期刊上的26项实证研究(23项定量研究和3项定性研究)进行了综述。研究发现:这些研究表明,总体上,向市场经济的制度发展会导致对外直接投资的增加,但这种影响取决于这种发展的阶段和中国跨国公司的能力。自由化和支持性的对外直接投资政策也促进了对外直接投资活动,但仅限于有选择的领域。有关国有制的调查结果好坏参半。原创性/价值:本综述提供了关于多级监管机构如何影响中国对外直接投资的完整的经验证据。通过这种方式,我们可以识别出国内机构与对外直接投资的理论讨论与实证证据之间的研究差距。并对今后的研究方向提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regulatory Institutions and Chinese Outward FDI: An Empirical Review
Purpose: This paper seeks to review the effects of home regulatory institutions on outward FDI (OFDI) in the context of China and discuss the extent to which they can be extended to other emerging markets. We especially compare these empirical studies with theoretical discussions in each category, identify research gaps, and suggest future research ideas. Practical implications are discussed. Design/methodology/approach: It focuses specifically on three categories of regulatory institutions, including overall institutional development, liberalization of OFDI policies, and state ownership (and its closely approximate forms). Using a systematic review, this paper has reviewed 26 empirical studies (23 quantitative and 3 qualitative studies) published in peer-reviewed journals. Findings: These studies suggest that overall institutional development towards a market economy in general leads to increased OFDI, but this effect is contingent on the stage of such development and the capabilities of Chinese multinationals. Liberalized and supportive OFDI policies also facilitate OFDI activities, but only into selective areas. Findings on state ownership have been mixed. Originality/value: This review offers a full picture of empirical evidence on how multiple levels of regulatory institutions affect OFDI from China. In this way, we can identify the research gaps between theoretical discussions on home institutions and OFDI and empirical evidence. Thus we make suggestions for future directions of studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing Intra-day Patterns of Stock Market Activity FRM Financial Risk Meter for Emerging Markets The Evolution of the Earnings Distribution in a Volatile Economy: Evidence from Argentina The Effects of COVID-19 Spread on the Egyptian Exchange Sectors: Winners and Losers across Time Hierarchical PCA and Modeling Asset Correlations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1