{"title":"非阻塞二叉搜索树的平摊复杂度","authors":"Faith Ellen, P. Fatourou, J. Helga, E. Ruppert","doi":"10.1145/2611462.2611486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We improve upon an existing non-blocking implementation of a binary search tree from single-word compare-and-swap instructions. We show that the worst-case amortized step complexity of performing a Find, Insert or Delete operation op on the tree is O(h(op)+c(op)) where h(op) is the height of the tree at the beginning of op and c(op) is the maximum number of operations accessing the tree at any one time during op. This is the first bound on the complexity of a non-blocking implementation of a search tree.","PeriodicalId":186800,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The amortized complexity of non-blocking binary search trees\",\"authors\":\"Faith Ellen, P. Fatourou, J. Helga, E. Ruppert\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2611462.2611486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We improve upon an existing non-blocking implementation of a binary search tree from single-word compare-and-swap instructions. We show that the worst-case amortized step complexity of performing a Find, Insert or Delete operation op on the tree is O(h(op)+c(op)) where h(op) is the height of the tree at the beginning of op and c(op) is the maximum number of operations accessing the tree at any one time during op. This is the first bound on the complexity of a non-blocking implementation of a search tree.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2611462.2611486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2611462.2611486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The amortized complexity of non-blocking binary search trees
We improve upon an existing non-blocking implementation of a binary search tree from single-word compare-and-swap instructions. We show that the worst-case amortized step complexity of performing a Find, Insert or Delete operation op on the tree is O(h(op)+c(op)) where h(op) is the height of the tree at the beginning of op and c(op) is the maximum number of operations accessing the tree at any one time during op. This is the first bound on the complexity of a non-blocking implementation of a search tree.