交替空域结构的碰撞风险分析

J. Shortle, Seungwon Noh, L. Sherry
{"title":"交替空域结构的碰撞风险分析","authors":"J. Shortle, Seungwon Noh, L. Sherry","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2017.8102093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates an airspace architecture in which the core requirement is maintaining a target level of collision risk throughout the airspace, accounting for a diversity of aircraft types and a diversity of collision avoidance capabilities in different regions of the airspace. Because collision risk depends on both the density of aircraft and the collision avoidance capabilities of the aircraft involved, aircraft with better collision avoidance capabilities are able to fly in regions of higher density. Conversely, aircraft with lesser collision avoidance capabilities are restricted to less dense airspace or off-peak hours. This paper provides a framework for evaluating the proposed architecture, including a framework for evaluating collision risk based on the numbers and types of aircraft in the airspace and a framework for specifying the corresponding airspace admittance function. Properties of the airspace admittance function are explored and airspace designs are suggested based on the results. In particular, if high-equipped aircraft are not adversely affected by low-equipped aircraft, from a collision avoidance perspective, then the aircraft should fly together in the same airspace to maximize capacity. But otherwise, it may be better to segregate the aircraft types into distinct regions of airspace.","PeriodicalId":130890,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"66 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collision risk analysis for alternate airspace architectures\",\"authors\":\"J. Shortle, Seungwon Noh, L. Sherry\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DASC.2017.8102093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates an airspace architecture in which the core requirement is maintaining a target level of collision risk throughout the airspace, accounting for a diversity of aircraft types and a diversity of collision avoidance capabilities in different regions of the airspace. Because collision risk depends on both the density of aircraft and the collision avoidance capabilities of the aircraft involved, aircraft with better collision avoidance capabilities are able to fly in regions of higher density. Conversely, aircraft with lesser collision avoidance capabilities are restricted to less dense airspace or off-peak hours. This paper provides a framework for evaluating the proposed architecture, including a framework for evaluating collision risk based on the numbers and types of aircraft in the airspace and a framework for specifying the corresponding airspace admittance function. Properties of the airspace admittance function are explored and airspace designs are suggested based on the results. In particular, if high-equipped aircraft are not adversely affected by low-equipped aircraft, from a collision avoidance perspective, then the aircraft should fly together in the same airspace to maximize capacity. But otherwise, it may be better to segregate the aircraft types into distinct regions of airspace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"volume\":\"66 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2017.8102093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2017.8102093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文研究了一种空域架构,其核心要求是在整个空域保持目标碰撞风险水平,考虑到空域不同区域飞机类型和避碰能力的多样性。由于碰撞风险既取决于飞机的密度,也取决于飞机的避碰能力,因此避碰能力较好的飞机能够在密度较高的区域飞行。相反,防撞能力较弱的飞机被限制在密度较小的空域或非高峰时段。本文提供了一个评估拟议架构的框架,包括基于空域中飞机数量和类型评估碰撞风险的框架,以及指定相应空域导纳函数的框架。研究了空域导纳函数的性质,并在此基础上提出了空域设计建议。特别是,如果高装备的飞机没有受到低装备飞机的不利影响,从避免碰撞的角度来看,那么飞机应该在同一空域内一起飞行,以最大限度地提高运力。但除此之外,将飞机类型划分到不同的空域可能会更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collision risk analysis for alternate airspace architectures
This paper investigates an airspace architecture in which the core requirement is maintaining a target level of collision risk throughout the airspace, accounting for a diversity of aircraft types and a diversity of collision avoidance capabilities in different regions of the airspace. Because collision risk depends on both the density of aircraft and the collision avoidance capabilities of the aircraft involved, aircraft with better collision avoidance capabilities are able to fly in regions of higher density. Conversely, aircraft with lesser collision avoidance capabilities are restricted to less dense airspace or off-peak hours. This paper provides a framework for evaluating the proposed architecture, including a framework for evaluating collision risk based on the numbers and types of aircraft in the airspace and a framework for specifying the corresponding airspace admittance function. Properties of the airspace admittance function are explored and airspace designs are suggested based on the results. In particular, if high-equipped aircraft are not adversely affected by low-equipped aircraft, from a collision avoidance perspective, then the aircraft should fly together in the same airspace to maximize capacity. But otherwise, it may be better to segregate the aircraft types into distinct regions of airspace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards higher level of A-SMGCS: Handshake of electric taxi and trajectory-based taxi operations Automatic speed profiling and automatic landings during advanced RNP to xLS flight tests An assessment of reduced crew and single pilot operations in commercial transport aircraft operations Evaluation of a tactical surface metering tool for Charlotte Douglas international airport via human-in-the-loop simulation Recommended changes to interval management to achieve operational implementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1