盗贼之间的荣誉:一个普通人对网络犯罪经济的分析

Sadia Afroz, Vaibhav Garg, Damon McCoy, R. Greenstadt
{"title":"盗贼之间的荣誉:一个普通人对网络犯罪经济的分析","authors":"Sadia Afroz, Vaibhav Garg, Damon McCoy, R. Greenstadt","doi":"10.1109/ECRS.2013.6805778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Underground forums enable technical innovation among criminals as well as allow for specialization, thereby making cybercrime economically efficient. The success of these forums is contingent on collective action twixt a variety of stakeholders. What distinguishes sustainable forums from those that fail? We begin to address these questions by examining underground forums under an economic framework that has been used to prescribe institutional choices in other domains, such as fisheries and forests. This framework examines the sustainability of cybercrime forums given a self governance model for a common-pool resource. We analyze five distinct forums: AntiChat (AC), BadHackerZ (BH), BlackhatWorld (BW), Carders (CC), and L33tCrew (LC). Our analyses indicate that successful/sustainable forums: 1) have easy/cheap community monitoring, 2) show moderate increase in new members, 3) do not witness reduced connectivity as the network size increases, 4) limit privileged access, and 5) enforce bans or fines on offending members. We define success as forums demonstrating small world effect.","PeriodicalId":110678,"journal":{"name":"2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Honor among thieves: A common's analysis of cybercrime economies\",\"authors\":\"Sadia Afroz, Vaibhav Garg, Damon McCoy, R. Greenstadt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECRS.2013.6805778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Underground forums enable technical innovation among criminals as well as allow for specialization, thereby making cybercrime economically efficient. The success of these forums is contingent on collective action twixt a variety of stakeholders. What distinguishes sustainable forums from those that fail? We begin to address these questions by examining underground forums under an economic framework that has been used to prescribe institutional choices in other domains, such as fisheries and forests. This framework examines the sustainability of cybercrime forums given a self governance model for a common-pool resource. We analyze five distinct forums: AntiChat (AC), BadHackerZ (BH), BlackhatWorld (BW), Carders (CC), and L33tCrew (LC). Our analyses indicate that successful/sustainable forums: 1) have easy/cheap community monitoring, 2) show moderate increase in new members, 3) do not witness reduced connectivity as the network size increases, 4) limit privileged access, and 5) enforce bans or fines on offending members. We define success as forums demonstrating small world effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECRS.2013.6805778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECRS.2013.6805778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

地下论坛使犯罪分子能够进行技术创新,并允许专业化,从而使网络犯罪具有经济效益。这些论坛的成功取决于各利益攸关方之间的集体行动。可持续论坛与失败论坛的区别是什么?我们开始通过审查在经济框架下的地下论坛来解决这些问题,这种经济框架曾被用来规定渔业和森林等其他领域的体制选择。该框架考察了网络犯罪论坛的可持续性,并给出了一个公共资源池的自我管理模型。我们分析了五个不同的论坛:AntiChat (AC)、BadHackerZ (BH)、BlackhatWorld (BW)、Carders (CC)和L33tCrew (LC)。我们的分析表明,成功/可持续的论坛:1)有简单/廉价的社区监控,2)新成员适度增加,3)随着网络规模的增加,连接不会减少,4)限制特权访问,5)对违规成员实施禁令或罚款。我们把成功定义为展示小世界效应的论坛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Honor among thieves: A common's analysis of cybercrime economies
Underground forums enable technical innovation among criminals as well as allow for specialization, thereby making cybercrime economically efficient. The success of these forums is contingent on collective action twixt a variety of stakeholders. What distinguishes sustainable forums from those that fail? We begin to address these questions by examining underground forums under an economic framework that has been used to prescribe institutional choices in other domains, such as fisheries and forests. This framework examines the sustainability of cybercrime forums given a self governance model for a common-pool resource. We analyze five distinct forums: AntiChat (AC), BadHackerZ (BH), BlackhatWorld (BW), Carders (CC), and L33tCrew (LC). Our analyses indicate that successful/sustainable forums: 1) have easy/cheap community monitoring, 2) show moderate increase in new members, 3) do not witness reduced connectivity as the network size increases, 4) limit privileged access, and 5) enforce bans or fines on offending members. We define success as forums demonstrating small world effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
$1.00 per RT #BostonMarathon #PrayForBoston: Analyzing fake content on Twitter 10v3.c0ns Modeling malicious domain name take-down dynamics: Why eCrime pays A notation for describing the steps in indicator expansion Monitoring a fast flux botnet using recursive and passive DNS: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1