{"title":"从默认到设计:图书馆和图书馆关系的基于设计的评估","authors":"R. Clarke","doi":"10.29242/lac.2018.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction There can be no doubt about the recent rise of interest in assessment in librarianship. Popular assessment methods range from quantitative approaches (such as user surveys, usability heuristics, and data and search logs) to qualitative techniques (user interviews, photo elicitation, immersive ethnographies, and more). Many discussions ensue about which of these scientific-based methods is best applicable to the library work at hand, but few have questioned the assumption that scientific methods are the most relevant and applicable assessment methods for librarianship overall.","PeriodicalId":193553,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","volume":"119 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Default to Design: Design-Based Assessment for Libraries and Librarianship\",\"authors\":\"R. Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.29242/lac.2018.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction There can be no doubt about the recent rise of interest in assessment in librarianship. Popular assessment methods range from quantitative approaches (such as user surveys, usability heuristics, and data and search logs) to qualitative techniques (user interviews, photo elicitation, immersive ethnographies, and more). Many discussions ensue about which of these scientific-based methods is best applicable to the library work at hand, but few have questioned the assumption that scientific methods are the most relevant and applicable assessment methods for librarianship overall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX\",\"volume\":\"119 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29242/lac.2018.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29242/lac.2018.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
From Default to Design: Design-Based Assessment for Libraries and Librarianship
Introduction There can be no doubt about the recent rise of interest in assessment in librarianship. Popular assessment methods range from quantitative approaches (such as user surveys, usability heuristics, and data and search logs) to qualitative techniques (user interviews, photo elicitation, immersive ethnographies, and more). Many discussions ensue about which of these scientific-based methods is best applicable to the library work at hand, but few have questioned the assumption that scientific methods are the most relevant and applicable assessment methods for librarianship overall.