浅析青少年堕胎案件中法官考虑依据的缺乏

Estudiante Law Journal Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI:10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18339

LM Ady Saputra

{"title":"浅析青少年堕胎案件中法官考虑依据的缺乏","authors":"LM Ady Saputra","doi":"10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this writing is to analyze what the judges consider about the crime of abortion (Decision Study Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto). The writing method used is Normative writing, using 2 approaches namely; law (statute approach) and a case approach (case approach). The results of this writing show; In decision Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto. Judges are not based on strong juridical considerations by applying the principle of lex specialist derogate legi general and the principle of lex posterior derogate legi priori,","PeriodicalId":309785,"journal":{"name":"Estudiante Law Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Lack of Basis for Judge Considerations in Cases of Abortion by Teenagers\",\"authors\":\"LM Ady Saputra\",\"doi\":\"10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this writing is to analyze what the judges consider about the crime of abortion (Decision Study Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto). The writing method used is Normative writing, using 2 approaches namely; law (statute approach) and a case approach (case approach). The results of this writing show; In decision Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto. Judges are not based on strong juridical considerations by applying the principle of lex specialist derogate legi general and the principle of lex posterior derogate legi priori,\",\"PeriodicalId\":309785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudiante Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudiante Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudiante Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的目的是分析法官对堕胎罪的看法(决策研究编号:90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto)。使用的写作方法是规范写作，使用两种方法，即;法律方法(成文法方法)和案例方法(案例方法)。本文的写作结果表明;决议号:90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto。法官没有基于强烈的司法考虑而适用专门法减损一般法律原则和事后法减损先验法律原则;

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Analysis of Lack of Basis for Judge Considerations in Cases of Abortion by Teenagers

The purpose of this writing is to analyze what the judges consider about the crime of abortion (Decision Study Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto). The writing method used is Normative writing, using 2 approaches namely; law (statute approach) and a case approach (case approach). The results of this writing show; In decision Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto. Judges are not based on strong juridical considerations by applying the principle of lex specialist derogate legi general and the principle of lex posterior derogate legi priori,

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Estudiante Law Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量