河流预测误差方法与子空间识别方法的比较

H. Nasir, E. Weyer
{"title":"河流预测误差方法与子空间识别方法的比较","authors":"H. Nasir, E. Weyer","doi":"10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data based modelling is an important tool in the operation and management of rivers. In this paper, we compare Prediction Error Methods (PEM) and Subspace Identification Methods (SIM) for system identification of rivers. PEM can incorporate the available prior information and can accommodate the non-linearities in the model structure with ease. The models obtained by SIM are linear, and it is generally difficult to incorporate prior information, but SIM is well suited to MIMO systems such as rivers. In this paper, we simulate a few typical river scenarios and use the simulated data to obtain PEM and SIM based models. The models are compared using several measures and for the scenarios considered it is found that PEM has an edge over SIM.","PeriodicalId":177490,"journal":{"name":"2013 Australian Control Conference","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of prediction error methods and subspace identification methods for rivers\",\"authors\":\"H. Nasir, E. Weyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data based modelling is an important tool in the operation and management of rivers. In this paper, we compare Prediction Error Methods (PEM) and Subspace Identification Methods (SIM) for system identification of rivers. PEM can incorporate the available prior information and can accommodate the non-linearities in the model structure with ease. The models obtained by SIM are linear, and it is generally difficult to incorporate prior information, but SIM is well suited to MIMO systems such as rivers. In this paper, we simulate a few typical river scenarios and use the simulated data to obtain PEM and SIM based models. The models are compared using several measures and for the scenarios considered it is found that PEM has an edge over SIM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Australian Control Conference\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Australian Control Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Australian Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

基于数据的建模是河流运行和管理的重要工具。本文比较了预测误差法(PEM)和子空间识别法(SIM)在河流系统识别中的应用。PEM可以结合现有的先验信息,并且可以很容易地适应模型结构中的非线性。SIM模型是线性的,通常难以纳入先验信息,但SIM很适合多输入多输出系统,如河流。在本文中,我们模拟了几种典型的河流场景,并利用模拟数据获得了基于PEM和SIM的模型。使用几种测量方法对模型进行了比较,对于所考虑的场景,发现PEM比SIM具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of prediction error methods and subspace identification methods for rivers
Data based modelling is an important tool in the operation and management of rivers. In this paper, we compare Prediction Error Methods (PEM) and Subspace Identification Methods (SIM) for system identification of rivers. PEM can incorporate the available prior information and can accommodate the non-linearities in the model structure with ease. The models obtained by SIM are linear, and it is generally difficult to incorporate prior information, but SIM is well suited to MIMO systems such as rivers. In this paper, we simulate a few typical river scenarios and use the simulated data to obtain PEM and SIM based models. The models are compared using several measures and for the scenarios considered it is found that PEM has an edge over SIM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A gap metric perspective of well-posedness for nonlinear feedback interconnections Heteroclinic optimal control solutions for attitude motion planning On the uniform global pre-asymptotic stability of closed sets for switched hybrid systems Control the active and reactive powers of three-phase grid-connected photovoltaic inverters using feedback linearization and fuzzy logic Active piezoelectric shunt control of an Atomic Force Microscope micro-cantilever
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1