司法覆核的补救措施

F. McKenzie
{"title":"司法覆核的补救措施","authors":"F. McKenzie","doi":"10.1017/9781108227773.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, anyone seeking judicial review had to use the common law procedure of seeking the issue of a “prerogative writ”. A prerogative writ is formally an order from the sovereign","PeriodicalId":296526,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law in Hong Kong","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remedies in Judicial Review\",\"authors\":\"F. McKenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108227773.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, anyone seeking judicial review had to use the common law procedure of seeking the issue of a “prerogative writ”. A prerogative writ is formally an order from the sovereign\",\"PeriodicalId\":296526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative Law in Hong Kong\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative Law in Hong Kong\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108227773.030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Law in Hong Kong","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108227773.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,任何寻求司法审查的人都必须使用寻求签发“特权令状”的普通法程序。特权令状是君主发出的正式命令
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remedies in Judicial Review
Traditionally, anyone seeking judicial review had to use the common law procedure of seeking the issue of a “prerogative writ”. A prerogative writ is formally an order from the sovereign
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Excess of Power, the Limits of Discretionary Power and Non-Compliance with Statute Procedural Fairness, Procedural Impropriety and Natural Justice Judicial Review Administrative Tribunals and Administrative Complaints Judicial Remedies, Non-Judicial Remedies and Subsidiary Legislation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1