主动费用能预测共同基金流量吗?-主动管理需求的价格敏感性

Trond Døskeland, A. Sjuve, Andreas Ørpetveit
{"title":"主动费用能预测共同基金流量吗?-主动管理需求的价格敏感性","authors":"Trond Døskeland, A. Sjuve, Andreas Ørpetveit","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3857628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active fee is the ratio between the excess cost of active management over the index alternative and the fund's activity level. We suggest a simple model that explains active capital allocations in the presence of time-varying active fee. We show that investors respond in accordance with the model's prediction of a negative relationship between active fee and subsequent flows. Our findings can be interpreted as negative price elasticity of demand for active management, where one standard deviation change in active fee translates into a shift in net flow of 83.4 bps. This effect implies a 42% change in the unconditional expected yearly flow. The time-series relation is driven by both the activity level and the excess cost of active management. The result also holds after controlling for Morningstar Ratings.","PeriodicalId":233958,"journal":{"name":"European Finance eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Active Fee Predict Mutual Fund Flow? - Price Sensitivity of Demand for Active Management\",\"authors\":\"Trond Døskeland, A. Sjuve, Andreas Ørpetveit\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3857628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Active fee is the ratio between the excess cost of active management over the index alternative and the fund's activity level. We suggest a simple model that explains active capital allocations in the presence of time-varying active fee. We show that investors respond in accordance with the model's prediction of a negative relationship between active fee and subsequent flows. Our findings can be interpreted as negative price elasticity of demand for active management, where one standard deviation change in active fee translates into a shift in net flow of 83.4 bps. This effect implies a 42% change in the unconditional expected yearly flow. The time-series relation is driven by both the activity level and the excess cost of active management. The result also holds after controlling for Morningstar Ratings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3857628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3857628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动管理费是指主动管理相对于指数替代产品的超额成本与基金的活跃程度之比。我们提出了一个简单的模型来解释存在时变主动费用的主动资本配置。我们表明,投资者的反应符合模型对主动费用与后续流量之间负相关关系的预测。我们的研究结果可以解释为主动管理需求的负价格弹性,其中主动费用的一个标准差变化转化为净流量的83.4个基点的变化。这种影响意味着无条件预期年流量的变化为42%。时间序列关系是由活动水平和主动管理的超额成本驱动的。在控制了晨星评级(Morningstar Ratings)之后,这个结果同样成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Active Fee Predict Mutual Fund Flow? - Price Sensitivity of Demand for Active Management
Active fee is the ratio between the excess cost of active management over the index alternative and the fund's activity level. We suggest a simple model that explains active capital allocations in the presence of time-varying active fee. We show that investors respond in accordance with the model's prediction of a negative relationship between active fee and subsequent flows. Our findings can be interpreted as negative price elasticity of demand for active management, where one standard deviation change in active fee translates into a shift in net flow of 83.4 bps. This effect implies a 42% change in the unconditional expected yearly flow. The time-series relation is driven by both the activity level and the excess cost of active management. The result also holds after controlling for Morningstar Ratings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Option-Like Fund Performance Fees in Asset Management via Monte Carlo Actuarial Distortion Pricing Cultural values of parent bank board members and lending by foreign subsidiaries: The moderating role of personal traits Deleveraging CAPM: Asset Betas vs. Equity Betas The Dynamics of Financial Policies and Group Decisions in Private Firms Money Talks: Information and Seignorage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1