地方能源政策选择的环境因素:两个城市太阳能政策的比较案例

C. Curley, P. Aloise-young, Nicky Harrison, C. Xu, G. Duggan, D. Zimmerle
{"title":"地方能源政策选择的环境因素:两个城市太阳能政策的比较案例","authors":"C. Curley, P. Aloise-young, Nicky Harrison, C. Xu, G. Duggan, D. Zimmerle","doi":"10.3389/fsuep.2023.1180830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous recent calls have been made for policy design research to embed itself throughout the policy process and explore avenues for matching tools and targets. These calls have argued that policy design research, while emphasizing the content and the choice of design, has been under-leveraged, particularly in exploring rationales for effectiveness. In this paper, we conduct a comparative case study to explore variation in participation rates for two similarly categorized solar policies across two mid-sized cities. In this regard, three contextual factors are examined, including the population characteristics, the existing configuration of policies, and the physical environment, which all contribute to shaping policy effectiveness. We argue that policy design is situated within an explicit context and that without capturing the context, the effectiveness of policies may not translate if diffused.","PeriodicalId":262866,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextual factors in local energy policy choices: comparative case of solar energy policy in two cities\",\"authors\":\"C. Curley, P. Aloise-young, Nicky Harrison, C. Xu, G. Duggan, D. Zimmerle\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsuep.2023.1180830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerous recent calls have been made for policy design research to embed itself throughout the policy process and explore avenues for matching tools and targets. These calls have argued that policy design research, while emphasizing the content and the choice of design, has been under-leveraged, particularly in exploring rationales for effectiveness. In this paper, we conduct a comparative case study to explore variation in participation rates for two similarly categorized solar policies across two mid-sized cities. In this regard, three contextual factors are examined, including the population characteristics, the existing configuration of policies, and the physical environment, which all contribute to shaping policy effectiveness. We argue that policy design is situated within an explicit context and that without capturing the context, the effectiveness of policies may not translate if diffused.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2023.1180830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2023.1180830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近有许多人呼吁将政策设计研究嵌入到整个政策过程中,并探索匹配工具和目标的途径。这些呼吁认为,政策设计研究虽然强调设计的内容和选择,但杠杆作用不足,特别是在探索有效性的基本原理方面。在本文中,我们进行了一个比较案例研究,以探讨两个中等城市中两种类似分类的太阳能政策的参与率变化。在这方面,研究了三个背景因素,包括人口特征、现有政策结构和自然环境,它们都有助于形成政策的有效性。我们认为,政策设计是在一个明确的背景下进行的,如果没有捕捉到背景,政策的有效性可能不会在扩散的情况下转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contextual factors in local energy policy choices: comparative case of solar energy policy in two cities
Numerous recent calls have been made for policy design research to embed itself throughout the policy process and explore avenues for matching tools and targets. These calls have argued that policy design research, while emphasizing the content and the choice of design, has been under-leveraged, particularly in exploring rationales for effectiveness. In this paper, we conduct a comparative case study to explore variation in participation rates for two similarly categorized solar policies across two mid-sized cities. In this regard, three contextual factors are examined, including the population characteristics, the existing configuration of policies, and the physical environment, which all contribute to shaping policy effectiveness. We argue that policy design is situated within an explicit context and that without capturing the context, the effectiveness of policies may not translate if diffused.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the role of green finance in wind power development: using the nonparametric model Overview of high-power LED life prediction algorithms Impacts of non-residential solar on residential adoption decisions A bibliometric review of energy justice literature Linking energy policy, energy insecurity, and health outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1