{"title":"战后南方的特赦政策和精英坚持:来自回归不连续设计的证据","authors":"Jason Poulos","doi":"10.1561/115.00000013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the impact of Reconstruction-era amnesty policy on the officeholding and wealth of elites in the postbellum South. Amnesty policy restricted the political and economic rights of Southern elites for nearly three years during Reconstruction. I estimate the effect of being excluded from amnesty on elites’ future wealth and political power using a regression discontinuity design that compares individuals just above and below a wealth threshold that determined exclusion from amnesty. Results on a sample of Reconstruction convention delegates show that exclusion from amnesty significantly decreased the likelihood of ex-post officeholding. I find no evidence that exclusion impacted later census wealth for Reconstruction delegates or for a larger sample of known slaveholders who lived in the South in 1860. These findings are in line with previous studies evidencing both changes to the identity of the political elite, and the continuity of economic mobility among the planter elite across the Civil War and Reconstruction. †Address for correspondence: 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: poulos@hcp.med.harvard.edu. Acknowledgements: I thank Cyrus Corman-Gill, Amita Chauhan, Desiree Moshayedi, and JaVonte Morris-Wilson for help with transcribing census data. The paper benefited from constructive comments by David Bateman and participants of the “Slavery & Its Legacies Symposium” hosted by the USC Bedrosian Center. This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant DGE-1106400 and the National Science Foundation under Grant DMS-1638521 to the Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute. Data and code are available at https://github.com/jvpoulos/amnesty. ar X iv :2 10 3. 14 22 0v 2 [ ec on .G N ] 1 J un 2 02 1","PeriodicalId":116801,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Political Economy","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amnesty Policy and Elite Persistence in the Postbellum South: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design\",\"authors\":\"Jason Poulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/115.00000013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the impact of Reconstruction-era amnesty policy on the officeholding and wealth of elites in the postbellum South. Amnesty policy restricted the political and economic rights of Southern elites for nearly three years during Reconstruction. I estimate the effect of being excluded from amnesty on elites’ future wealth and political power using a regression discontinuity design that compares individuals just above and below a wealth threshold that determined exclusion from amnesty. Results on a sample of Reconstruction convention delegates show that exclusion from amnesty significantly decreased the likelihood of ex-post officeholding. I find no evidence that exclusion impacted later census wealth for Reconstruction delegates or for a larger sample of known slaveholders who lived in the South in 1860. These findings are in line with previous studies evidencing both changes to the identity of the political elite, and the continuity of economic mobility among the planter elite across the Civil War and Reconstruction. †Address for correspondence: 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: poulos@hcp.med.harvard.edu. Acknowledgements: I thank Cyrus Corman-Gill, Amita Chauhan, Desiree Moshayedi, and JaVonte Morris-Wilson for help with transcribing census data. The paper benefited from constructive comments by David Bateman and participants of the “Slavery & Its Legacies Symposium” hosted by the USC Bedrosian Center. This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant DGE-1106400 and the National Science Foundation under Grant DMS-1638521 to the Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute. Data and code are available at https://github.com/jvpoulos/amnesty. ar X iv :2 10 3. 14 22 0v 2 [ ec on .G N ] 1 J un 2 02 1\",\"PeriodicalId\":116801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/115.00000013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/115.00000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文研究了战后重建时期的特赦政策对南方精英阶层的任职和财富的影响。大赦政策在重建期间将近三年的时间里限制了南方精英的政治和经济权利。我使用回归不连续设计来估计被排除在大赦之外对精英未来财富和政治权力的影响,该设计比较了刚好高于和低于决定被排除在大赦之外的财富阈值的个人。重建大会代表样本的结果表明,被排除在特赦之外显著降低了前邮局任职的可能性。我没有发现任何证据表明,对重建代表或1860年生活在南方的已知奴隶主的更大样本来说,排斥影响了后来的人口普查财富。这些发现与先前的研究一致,证明了政治精英身份的变化,以及内战和重建期间种植园主精英之间经济流动性的连续性。†通信地址:180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115。电子邮件:poulos@hcp.med.harvard.edu。致谢:我感谢Cyrus Corman-Gill、Amita Chauhan、Desiree Moshayedi和JaVonte Morris-Wilson在转录人口普查数据方面的帮助。这篇论文得益于David Bateman和南加州大学Bedrosian中心举办的“奴隶制及其遗产研讨会”的参与者的建设性意见。本研究得到了美国国家科学基金研究生研究基金(DGE-1106400)和美国国家科学基金(DMS-1638521)对统计与应用数学科学研究所的部分支持。数据和代码可在https://github.com/jvpoulos/amnesty上获得。ar X iv:2 10 3。[J] [J] [J] [J] [J] [J]
Amnesty Policy and Elite Persistence in the Postbellum South: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design
This paper investigates the impact of Reconstruction-era amnesty policy on the officeholding and wealth of elites in the postbellum South. Amnesty policy restricted the political and economic rights of Southern elites for nearly three years during Reconstruction. I estimate the effect of being excluded from amnesty on elites’ future wealth and political power using a regression discontinuity design that compares individuals just above and below a wealth threshold that determined exclusion from amnesty. Results on a sample of Reconstruction convention delegates show that exclusion from amnesty significantly decreased the likelihood of ex-post officeholding. I find no evidence that exclusion impacted later census wealth for Reconstruction delegates or for a larger sample of known slaveholders who lived in the South in 1860. These findings are in line with previous studies evidencing both changes to the identity of the political elite, and the continuity of economic mobility among the planter elite across the Civil War and Reconstruction. †Address for correspondence: 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: poulos@hcp.med.harvard.edu. Acknowledgements: I thank Cyrus Corman-Gill, Amita Chauhan, Desiree Moshayedi, and JaVonte Morris-Wilson for help with transcribing census data. The paper benefited from constructive comments by David Bateman and participants of the “Slavery & Its Legacies Symposium” hosted by the USC Bedrosian Center. This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant DGE-1106400 and the National Science Foundation under Grant DMS-1638521 to the Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute. Data and code are available at https://github.com/jvpoulos/amnesty. ar X iv :2 10 3. 14 22 0v 2 [ ec on .G N ] 1 J un 2 02 1