企业应对气候变化和财务绩效:气候政策的影响

Andreas Ziegler, T. Busch, V. Hoffmann
{"title":"企业应对气候变化和财务绩效:气候政策的影响","authors":"Andreas Ziegler, T. Busch, V. Hoffmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1348476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on unique firm-level time series data, this paper empirically examines the relationship between corporate environmental and stock performance. In contrast to former studies, we consider corporate strategies to address climate change instead of general environmental activities and especially highlight the impact of the underlying environmental and climate policy regime. For this reason, we separately analyze the US and European stock markets for different sub-periods between 2001 and 2006. Methodologically, we compare the risk-adjusted returns of stock portfolios comprising corporations that differ in their responses to climate change. These returns are not only estimated in the common one-factor model based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), but also in the more flexible Carhart four-factor model. Our portfolio analysis first shows a negative relationship between corporate activities to address climate change and financial performance over the entire period from 2001 to 2006, especially for Europe. Furthermore, we especially find that a trading strategy which bought stocks of European corporations with stronger responses to climate change and sold stocks of European corporations with weaker responses to climate change led to negative abnormal returns in the period with less ambitious climate policy from 2001 to 2003, but to positive abnormal returns in the period with a more stringent climate policy regime from 2004 to 2006. In contrast, the US stock market produced negative risk-adjusted returns for the latter period with a rather weak environmental regulation framework.","PeriodicalId":365753,"journal":{"name":"CGN: The Environment (Topic)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Responses to Climate Change and Financial Performance: The Impact of Climate Policy\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Ziegler, T. Busch, V. Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1348476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on unique firm-level time series data, this paper empirically examines the relationship between corporate environmental and stock performance. In contrast to former studies, we consider corporate strategies to address climate change instead of general environmental activities and especially highlight the impact of the underlying environmental and climate policy regime. For this reason, we separately analyze the US and European stock markets for different sub-periods between 2001 and 2006. Methodologically, we compare the risk-adjusted returns of stock portfolios comprising corporations that differ in their responses to climate change. These returns are not only estimated in the common one-factor model based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), but also in the more flexible Carhart four-factor model. Our portfolio analysis first shows a negative relationship between corporate activities to address climate change and financial performance over the entire period from 2001 to 2006, especially for Europe. Furthermore, we especially find that a trading strategy which bought stocks of European corporations with stronger responses to climate change and sold stocks of European corporations with weaker responses to climate change led to negative abnormal returns in the period with less ambitious climate policy from 2001 to 2003, but to positive abnormal returns in the period with a more stringent climate policy regime from 2004 to 2006. In contrast, the US stock market produced negative risk-adjusted returns for the latter period with a rather weak environmental regulation framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: The Environment (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: The Environment (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1348476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: The Environment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1348476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

本文基于独特的企业层面时间序列数据,实证检验了企业环境与股票绩效之间的关系。与以往的研究不同,我们考虑企业应对气候变化的战略,而不是一般的环境活动,并特别强调潜在的环境和气候政策制度的影响。因此,我们分别分析了2001年至2006年不同时期的美国和欧洲股票市场。在方法上,我们比较了由对气候变化反应不同的公司组成的股票投资组合的风险调整收益。这些收益不仅可以用基于资本资产定价模型(CAPM)的常见单因素模型来估计,也可以用更灵活的Carhart四因素模型来估计。我们的投资组合分析首先显示,在2001年至2006年的整个时期,企业应对气候变化的活动与财务绩效之间存在负相关关系,尤其是在欧洲。此外,我们特别发现,买入对气候变化反应较强的欧洲公司的股票,卖出对气候变化反应较弱的欧洲公司的股票的交易策略在2001 - 2003年气候政策不太积极的时期导致了负的异常收益,而在2004 - 2006年气候政策制度更严格的时期导致了正的异常收益。相比之下,在环境监管框架相当薄弱的情况下,美国股市在后一时期的风险调整后回报率为负。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate Responses to Climate Change and Financial Performance: The Impact of Climate Policy
Based on unique firm-level time series data, this paper empirically examines the relationship between corporate environmental and stock performance. In contrast to former studies, we consider corporate strategies to address climate change instead of general environmental activities and especially highlight the impact of the underlying environmental and climate policy regime. For this reason, we separately analyze the US and European stock markets for different sub-periods between 2001 and 2006. Methodologically, we compare the risk-adjusted returns of stock portfolios comprising corporations that differ in their responses to climate change. These returns are not only estimated in the common one-factor model based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), but also in the more flexible Carhart four-factor model. Our portfolio analysis first shows a negative relationship between corporate activities to address climate change and financial performance over the entire period from 2001 to 2006, especially for Europe. Furthermore, we especially find that a trading strategy which bought stocks of European corporations with stronger responses to climate change and sold stocks of European corporations with weaker responses to climate change led to negative abnormal returns in the period with less ambitious climate policy from 2001 to 2003, but to positive abnormal returns in the period with a more stringent climate policy regime from 2004 to 2006. In contrast, the US stock market produced negative risk-adjusted returns for the latter period with a rather weak environmental regulation framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are Carbon Emissions Associated with Stock Returns? Total Portfolio Activation: A Framework for Creating Social and Environmental Impact across Asset Classes Corporate Governance in a Carbon Constrained World Time and Country Specific Institutional Effects on Corporate Social Disclosure by Financial Institutions: Evidence from Fourteen European Countries Market Valuation of Corporate CO₂ Emissions, Disclosure and Emissions Trading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1