{"title":"无线传感器网络中随机航路点对仿生路由协议的影响","authors":"Asmae El Ghazi, B. Ahiod","doi":"10.1109/SETIT.2016.7939888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Etiam lobortis facilisis sem. Nullam nec mi et neque pharetra sollicitudin. Praesent imperdiet mi nec ante. Donec ullamcorper, felis non sodales commodo, lectus velit ultrices augue, a dignissim nibh lectus placerat pede. Vivamus nunc nunc, molestie ut, ultricies vel, semper in, velit. Ut porttitor. Praesent in sapien. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Duis fringilla tristique neque. Sed interdum libero ut metus. Pellentesque placerat. Nam rutrum augue a leo. Morbi sed elit sit amet ante lobortis sollicitudin. Praesent blandit blandit mauris. Praesent lectus tellus, aliquet aliquam, luctus a, egestas a, turpis. Mauris lacinia lorem sit amet ipsum. Nunc quis urna dictum turpis accumsan semper. Depending on the application requirements, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are composed by static or mobile sensor nodes. The weaknesses of sensors with mobility arise major challenges especially in routing. Routing in WSNs is among the NP-hard optimization problem that requires efficient and robust methods such as metaheuristics. The ant colony optimization (ACO) and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) are the most used metaheuristics for solving this problem in static WSNs. For dynamic WSNs, the model random waypoint (RWP) is widely proposed to evaluate the performance of mobile networks. In this work, we present a new evaluation of the RWP model impact on the ACO and the PSO-based routing protocols for WSNs, using different parameters like the number of nodes, simulation time and simulation area. Further, this study compares the performance of the ACO and the PSO routing protocols for mobile WSNs.","PeriodicalId":426951,"journal":{"name":"2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT)","volume":"278 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Random waypoint impact on bio-inspired routing protocols in WSN\",\"authors\":\"Asmae El Ghazi, B. Ahiod\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SETIT.2016.7939888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Etiam lobortis facilisis sem. Nullam nec mi et neque pharetra sollicitudin. Praesent imperdiet mi nec ante. Donec ullamcorper, felis non sodales commodo, lectus velit ultrices augue, a dignissim nibh lectus placerat pede. Vivamus nunc nunc, molestie ut, ultricies vel, semper in, velit. Ut porttitor. Praesent in sapien. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Duis fringilla tristique neque. Sed interdum libero ut metus. Pellentesque placerat. Nam rutrum augue a leo. Morbi sed elit sit amet ante lobortis sollicitudin. Praesent blandit blandit mauris. Praesent lectus tellus, aliquet aliquam, luctus a, egestas a, turpis. Mauris lacinia lorem sit amet ipsum. Nunc quis urna dictum turpis accumsan semper. Depending on the application requirements, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are composed by static or mobile sensor nodes. The weaknesses of sensors with mobility arise major challenges especially in routing. Routing in WSNs is among the NP-hard optimization problem that requires efficient and robust methods such as metaheuristics. The ant colony optimization (ACO) and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) are the most used metaheuristics for solving this problem in static WSNs. For dynamic WSNs, the model random waypoint (RWP) is widely proposed to evaluate the performance of mobile networks. In this work, we present a new evaluation of the RWP model impact on the ACO and the PSO-based routing protocols for WSNs, using different parameters like the number of nodes, simulation time and simulation area. Further, this study compares the performance of the ACO and the PSO routing protocols for mobile WSNs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT)\",\"volume\":\"278 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SETIT.2016.7939888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SETIT.2016.7939888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.Etiam lobortis facilisis sem.Nullam nec mi et neque pharetra sollicitudin.Praesent imperdiet mi nec ante.Donec ullamcorper, felis non sodales commodo, lectus velit ultrices augue, a dignissim nibh lectus placerat pede.Vivamus nunc nunc, molestie ut, ultricies vel, semper in, velit.Ut porttitor.Praesent in sapien.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.Duis fringilla tristique neque.Sed interdum libero ut metus.Pellentesque placerat.Nam rutrum augue a leo.Morbi sed elit sit amet ante lobortis sollicitudin.Praesent blandit blandit mauris.蓓蕾绽放、蓓蕾绽放、蓓蕾绽放、蓓蕾绽放、蓓蕾绽放、蓓蕾绽放。Mauris lacinia lorem sit amet ipsum.Nunc quis urna dictum turpis accumsan semper.根据应用要求,无线传感器网络(WSN)由静态或移动传感器节点组成。具有移动性的传感器的弱点带来了重大挑战,特别是在路由选择方面。WSN 中的路由问题属于 NP 难优化问题,需要采用元启发式等高效、稳健的方法。蚁群优化(ACO)和粒子群优化(PSO)是解决静态 WSN 问题最常用的元启发式方法。对于动态 WSN,随机航点模型(RWP)被广泛用于评估移动网络的性能。在这项工作中,我们使用节点数量、模拟时间和模拟区域等不同参数,对 RWP 模型对基于 ACO 和 PSO 的 WSN 路由协议的影响进行了新的评估。此外,本研究还比较了移动 WSN 的 ACO 和 PSO 路由协议的性能。
Random waypoint impact on bio-inspired routing protocols in WSN
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Etiam lobortis facilisis sem. Nullam nec mi et neque pharetra sollicitudin. Praesent imperdiet mi nec ante. Donec ullamcorper, felis non sodales commodo, lectus velit ultrices augue, a dignissim nibh lectus placerat pede. Vivamus nunc nunc, molestie ut, ultricies vel, semper in, velit. Ut porttitor. Praesent in sapien. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Duis fringilla tristique neque. Sed interdum libero ut metus. Pellentesque placerat. Nam rutrum augue a leo. Morbi sed elit sit amet ante lobortis sollicitudin. Praesent blandit blandit mauris. Praesent lectus tellus, aliquet aliquam, luctus a, egestas a, turpis. Mauris lacinia lorem sit amet ipsum. Nunc quis urna dictum turpis accumsan semper. Depending on the application requirements, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are composed by static or mobile sensor nodes. The weaknesses of sensors with mobility arise major challenges especially in routing. Routing in WSNs is among the NP-hard optimization problem that requires efficient and robust methods such as metaheuristics. The ant colony optimization (ACO) and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) are the most used metaheuristics for solving this problem in static WSNs. For dynamic WSNs, the model random waypoint (RWP) is widely proposed to evaluate the performance of mobile networks. In this work, we present a new evaluation of the RWP model impact on the ACO and the PSO-based routing protocols for WSNs, using different parameters like the number of nodes, simulation time and simulation area. Further, this study compares the performance of the ACO and the PSO routing protocols for mobile WSNs.