疏水性有机化学品的尖刺沉积物毒性测试:生物利用度,技术考虑和应用

P. Fuchsman, T. Barber
{"title":"疏水性有机化学品的尖刺沉积物毒性测试:生物利用度,技术考虑和应用","authors":"P. Fuchsman, T. Barber","doi":"10.1080/10588330091134257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many evaluations estimating safe levels of hydrophobic organic chemicals in sediments do not account for confounding factors such as physical habitat quality or covariance among chemicals. Controlled experiments demonstrating cause and effect can be conducted with spiked sediment toxicity tests, but application of this methodology has been limited in part by concerns about chemical bioavailability and challenges in achieving target concentrations. Relevant literature was reviewed to assess the utility of standardizing sediment equilibration times; hydrophobicity, complex sediment characteristics, and temperature were identified as potentially equally important factors. Disequilibrium appears likely following limited equilibration time but should yield conservative toxicity test results relative to aged field sediments. Nominal and measured concentrations in over 20 published studies were compared to assess spiked chemical recovery (i.e., measured concentration/nominal concentration). Recovery varied substantially among studies and was not readily predictable based on spiking or extraction method, chemical properties, or measured sediment characteristics, although unmeasured differences between sediments appeared to be important. Factors affecting specific studies included chemical adsorption to glassware, biodegradation, and volatilization. Pre- and post-toxicity test analyses are recommended to confirm exposure concentrations. Studies with 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) exemplify the utility of verifying results of field studies using spiked sediment tests. Sediments spiked with these chemicals at concentrations greatly exceeding those in associated field studies caused no adverse effects in test organisms, demonstrating that other chemicals co-occurring in test sediment samples caused toxicity initially attributed to 2,3,7,8-TCDD and HCB in the field studies. Another key application of spiked sediment tests has been the investigation of TOC as the primary factor affecting bioavailability of hydrophobic organic chemicals. A review of LC50s for nine chemicals reported in 12 studies shows that comparable LC50s derived in different sediments generally agree within a factor of five when concentrations are normalized to a constant TOC. Additionally, use of spiked sediment toxicity testing to investigate toxicological interactions among chemicals provides a promising approach to improving the ability to predict sediment toxicity in the field.","PeriodicalId":433778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Contamination","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spiked Sediment Toxicity Testing of Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals: Bioavailability, Technical Considerations, and Applications\",\"authors\":\"P. Fuchsman, T. Barber\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10588330091134257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many evaluations estimating safe levels of hydrophobic organic chemicals in sediments do not account for confounding factors such as physical habitat quality or covariance among chemicals. Controlled experiments demonstrating cause and effect can be conducted with spiked sediment toxicity tests, but application of this methodology has been limited in part by concerns about chemical bioavailability and challenges in achieving target concentrations. Relevant literature was reviewed to assess the utility of standardizing sediment equilibration times; hydrophobicity, complex sediment characteristics, and temperature were identified as potentially equally important factors. Disequilibrium appears likely following limited equilibration time but should yield conservative toxicity test results relative to aged field sediments. Nominal and measured concentrations in over 20 published studies were compared to assess spiked chemical recovery (i.e., measured concentration/nominal concentration). Recovery varied substantially among studies and was not readily predictable based on spiking or extraction method, chemical properties, or measured sediment characteristics, although unmeasured differences between sediments appeared to be important. Factors affecting specific studies included chemical adsorption to glassware, biodegradation, and volatilization. Pre- and post-toxicity test analyses are recommended to confirm exposure concentrations. Studies with 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) exemplify the utility of verifying results of field studies using spiked sediment tests. Sediments spiked with these chemicals at concentrations greatly exceeding those in associated field studies caused no adverse effects in test organisms, demonstrating that other chemicals co-occurring in test sediment samples caused toxicity initially attributed to 2,3,7,8-TCDD and HCB in the field studies. Another key application of spiked sediment tests has been the investigation of TOC as the primary factor affecting bioavailability of hydrophobic organic chemicals. A review of LC50s for nine chemicals reported in 12 studies shows that comparable LC50s derived in different sediments generally agree within a factor of five when concentrations are normalized to a constant TOC. Additionally, use of spiked sediment toxicity testing to investigate toxicological interactions among chemicals provides a promising approach to improving the ability to predict sediment toxicity in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil Contamination\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil Contamination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588330091134257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Contamination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588330091134257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

许多估计沉积物中疏水性有机化学品安全水平的评价没有考虑到诸如物理栖息地质量或化学品之间的协方差等混杂因素。可以通过加尖沉积物毒性试验进行证明因果关系的对照实验,但这种方法的应用受到限制,部分原因是对化学生物利用度的担忧以及在达到目标浓度方面的挑战。对相关文献进行了回顾,以评估标准化泥沙平衡时间的效用;疏水性、复杂沉积物特征和温度被认为是潜在的同样重要的因素。在有限的平衡时间后,可能出现不平衡,但相对于老化的野外沉积物,毒性测试结果应该保守。比较了20多项已发表研究的标称浓度和测量浓度,以评估加标化学回收率(即测量浓度/标称浓度)。虽然沉积物之间未测量的差异似乎很重要,但不同研究之间的回收率差异很大,而且很难根据峰值或提取方法、化学性质或测量的沉积物特征来预测。影响具体研究的因素包括玻璃器皿的化学吸附、生物降解和挥发。建议进行毒性前和毒性后试验分析,以确定暴露浓度。2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并-对二恶英(2,3,7,8- tcdd)和六氯苯(HCB)的研究举例说明了利用尖刺沉积物试验验证实地研究结果的效用。沉积物中这些化学物质的浓度大大超过相关实地研究中的浓度,对试验生物没有造成不利影响,这表明在试验沉积物样品中同时出现的其他化学物质造成的毒性最初在实地研究中归因于2,3,7,8- tcdd和HCB。加标沉淀物试验的另一个关键应用是研究TOC作为影响疏水性有机化学品生物利用度的主要因素。对12项研究报告的9种化学物质的lc50的回顾表明,当浓度归一化到恒定的TOC时,不同沉积物中提取的可比lc50通常在5因子内一致。此外,使用尖刺沉积物毒性测试来研究化学物质之间的毒理学相互作用,为提高现场预测沉积物毒性的能力提供了一种有希望的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spiked Sediment Toxicity Testing of Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals: Bioavailability, Technical Considerations, and Applications
Many evaluations estimating safe levels of hydrophobic organic chemicals in sediments do not account for confounding factors such as physical habitat quality or covariance among chemicals. Controlled experiments demonstrating cause and effect can be conducted with spiked sediment toxicity tests, but application of this methodology has been limited in part by concerns about chemical bioavailability and challenges in achieving target concentrations. Relevant literature was reviewed to assess the utility of standardizing sediment equilibration times; hydrophobicity, complex sediment characteristics, and temperature were identified as potentially equally important factors. Disequilibrium appears likely following limited equilibration time but should yield conservative toxicity test results relative to aged field sediments. Nominal and measured concentrations in over 20 published studies were compared to assess spiked chemical recovery (i.e., measured concentration/nominal concentration). Recovery varied substantially among studies and was not readily predictable based on spiking or extraction method, chemical properties, or measured sediment characteristics, although unmeasured differences between sediments appeared to be important. Factors affecting specific studies included chemical adsorption to glassware, biodegradation, and volatilization. Pre- and post-toxicity test analyses are recommended to confirm exposure concentrations. Studies with 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) exemplify the utility of verifying results of field studies using spiked sediment tests. Sediments spiked with these chemicals at concentrations greatly exceeding those in associated field studies caused no adverse effects in test organisms, demonstrating that other chemicals co-occurring in test sediment samples caused toxicity initially attributed to 2,3,7,8-TCDD and HCB in the field studies. Another key application of spiked sediment tests has been the investigation of TOC as the primary factor affecting bioavailability of hydrophobic organic chemicals. A review of LC50s for nine chemicals reported in 12 studies shows that comparable LC50s derived in different sediments generally agree within a factor of five when concentrations are normalized to a constant TOC. Additionally, use of spiked sediment toxicity testing to investigate toxicological interactions among chemicals provides a promising approach to improving the ability to predict sediment toxicity in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Explosives at the Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Settlement Prediction for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Using Power Creep Law Quantification of Compositional Changes of Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID and GC/MS during a Long-Term Bioremediation Experiment A Method for Assessing Leaching Potential for Petroleum Hydrocarbons Release Sites: Multiphase and Multisubstance Equilibrium Partitioning Monte Carlo Vadose Zone Model for Soil Remedial Criteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1