早期胃癌的内镜治疗

Gabriela Guirelli Lombardi, Maria Clara Monzani Gonçalves da Silva, Jarbas Faraco Maldonado Loureiro
{"title":"早期胃癌的内镜治疗","authors":"Gabriela Guirelli Lombardi, Maria Clara Monzani Gonçalves da Silva, Jarbas Faraco Maldonado Loureiro","doi":"10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;6;51-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: Early gastric cancer (PGC) is defined as gastric carcinoma, which invades up to the submucosal layer, with or without lymph node metastasis, regardless of the size of the lesion. The 5-year survival rate for tumors restricted to the mucosa is between 92 and 99%, and when they reach the submucosa, it varies from 85 to 93%. The objective is to gather information about PGC and possible endoscopic therapeutic approaches. METHODS: In this review, articles were selected through the PubMed and Google Scholar databases, between the years 2017 and 2021, in English and Portuguese. CONCLUSION: Although the gold standard treatment for PGC is gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy, endoscopic resection has become the approach of choice as it presents results comparable to conventional surgery, in reducing morbidity and mortality, with low complication rates and low cost, as well as preserving the quality of life of the patient. There are two possible techniques: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). When comparing the two techniques, EMR is not indicated for resecting lesions larger than 2 cm, as it increases the risk of local recurrence. In turn, ESD has higher rates of en bloc resection of larger lesions, however, it is associated with higher perforation rates and a longer procedure time. Follow-up is defined based on the classification of the lesion according to the endoscopic curability index (eCure) A, B, or C. Endoscopic treatment for PGC has replaced conventional surgery as it is a minimally invasive method and has several advantages.","PeriodicalId":285800,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRATAMENTO ENDOSCÓPICO DA NEOPLASIA GÁSTRICA PRECOCE\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Guirelli Lombardi, Maria Clara Monzani Gonçalves da Silva, Jarbas Faraco Maldonado Loureiro\",\"doi\":\"10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;6;51-55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: Early gastric cancer (PGC) is defined as gastric carcinoma, which invades up to the submucosal layer, with or without lymph node metastasis, regardless of the size of the lesion. The 5-year survival rate for tumors restricted to the mucosa is between 92 and 99%, and when they reach the submucosa, it varies from 85 to 93%. The objective is to gather information about PGC and possible endoscopic therapeutic approaches. METHODS: In this review, articles were selected through the PubMed and Google Scholar databases, between the years 2017 and 2021, in English and Portuguese. CONCLUSION: Although the gold standard treatment for PGC is gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy, endoscopic resection has become the approach of choice as it presents results comparable to conventional surgery, in reducing morbidity and mortality, with low complication rates and low cost, as well as preserving the quality of life of the patient. There are two possible techniques: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). When comparing the two techniques, EMR is not indicated for resecting lesions larger than 2 cm, as it increases the risk of local recurrence. In turn, ESD has higher rates of en bloc resection of larger lesions, however, it is associated with higher perforation rates and a longer procedure time. Follow-up is defined based on the classification of the lesion according to the endoscopic curability index (eCure) A, B, or C. Endoscopic treatment for PGC has replaced conventional surgery as it is a minimally invasive method and has several advantages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;6;51-55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;6;51-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:早期胃癌(PGC)被定义为胃癌,其浸润至粘膜下层,伴或不伴淋巴结转移,与病变大小无关。局限于粘膜的肿瘤5年生存率为92 ~ 99%,到达粘膜下层的肿瘤5年生存率为85 ~ 93%。目的是收集有关PGC的信息和可能的内镜治疗方法。方法:在本综述中,从PubMed和Google Scholar数据库中选择2017年至2021年的英文和葡萄牙文文章。结论:虽然PGC的金标准治疗方法是胃切除术加淋巴结切除术,但内镜切除在降低发病率和死亡率、低并发症发生率和低成本以及保留患者生活质量方面的效果与常规手术相当,已成为首选的治疗方法。有两种可能的技术:内镜下粘膜切除(EMR)和内镜下粘膜剥离(ESD)。当比较两种技术时,EMR不适用于切除大于2cm的病变,因为它增加了局部复发的风险。反过来,ESD对较大病变的整体切除率更高,然而,它与较高的穿孔率和较长的手术时间相关。根据内镜治愈率指数(eCure) A、B或c对病变进行分类,确定随访。PGC的内镜治疗已取代传统手术,因为它是一种微创的方法,并且有几个优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TRATAMENTO ENDOSCÓPICO DA NEOPLASIA GÁSTRICA PRECOCE
OBJECTIVE: Early gastric cancer (PGC) is defined as gastric carcinoma, which invades up to the submucosal layer, with or without lymph node metastasis, regardless of the size of the lesion. The 5-year survival rate for tumors restricted to the mucosa is between 92 and 99%, and when they reach the submucosa, it varies from 85 to 93%. The objective is to gather information about PGC and possible endoscopic therapeutic approaches. METHODS: In this review, articles were selected through the PubMed and Google Scholar databases, between the years 2017 and 2021, in English and Portuguese. CONCLUSION: Although the gold standard treatment for PGC is gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy, endoscopic resection has become the approach of choice as it presents results comparable to conventional surgery, in reducing morbidity and mortality, with low complication rates and low cost, as well as preserving the quality of life of the patient. There are two possible techniques: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). When comparing the two techniques, EMR is not indicated for resecting lesions larger than 2 cm, as it increases the risk of local recurrence. In turn, ESD has higher rates of en bloc resection of larger lesions, however, it is associated with higher perforation rates and a longer procedure time. Follow-up is defined based on the classification of the lesion according to the endoscopic curability index (eCure) A, B, or C. Endoscopic treatment for PGC has replaced conventional surgery as it is a minimally invasive method and has several advantages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uso de drogas entre estudantes universitários. Massive and early testing of SARS-COV2 in rural unions affiliated to FAESP-SENAR/SP. Diagnóstico molecular de agentes parasitários e coronavírus em gatos no Nordeste do Brasil. A one health approach to leishmaniasis in a slum: another piece of a global scenario. Conhecimento dos profissionais da equipe de Enfermagem sobre prevenção de infecção de corrente sanguínea relacionada a cateteres venosos em unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica e neonatal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1