“混合”形式的消费税收:欧盟增值税的可行替代方案?

J. Englisch
{"title":"“混合”形式的消费税收:欧盟增值税的可行替代方案?","authors":"J. Englisch","doi":"10.1080/20488432.2015.1120027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decades, VAT/GST systems have proliferated across the globe and have usually replaced any eventual cumulative turnover taxes or retail sales taxes (RST) previously operated in the respective country of adoption. However, the input VAT credit inherent to a VAT/GST facilitates some particular types of tax fraud which are absent in a turnover tax or RST system, especially because the entitlement of the business customer to the tax credit is normally not contingent upon the prior payment of the corresponding VAT/GST liability by the supplier. The ensuing ‘VAT gap’ has fueled the debate in the EU whether VAT should be transformed into a so-called ‘general reverse charge regime’ that would be equivalent to a RST while maintaining the invoice and audit trail of a VAT system . The reform project has gained momentum recently due to a proposal by the Commission which would allow the temporary application of a generalised reverse charge mechanism by Member States that so desire. This article discusses the pros and cons of such a hybrid system.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Hybrid’ forms of taxing consumption: A viable alternative to EU VAT?\",\"authors\":\"J. Englisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20488432.2015.1120027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last decades, VAT/GST systems have proliferated across the globe and have usually replaced any eventual cumulative turnover taxes or retail sales taxes (RST) previously operated in the respective country of adoption. However, the input VAT credit inherent to a VAT/GST facilitates some particular types of tax fraud which are absent in a turnover tax or RST system, especially because the entitlement of the business customer to the tax credit is normally not contingent upon the prior payment of the corresponding VAT/GST liability by the supplier. The ensuing ‘VAT gap’ has fueled the debate in the EU whether VAT should be transformed into a so-called ‘general reverse charge regime’ that would be equivalent to a RST while maintaining the invoice and audit trail of a VAT system . The reform project has gained momentum recently due to a proposal by the Commission which would allow the temporary application of a generalised reverse charge mechanism by Member States that so desire. This article discusses the pros and cons of such a hybrid system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20488432.2015.1120027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20488432.2015.1120027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的几十年里,增值税/商品及服务税系统在全球范围内激增,通常取代了以前在各自采用国家实施的任何最终累积流转税或零售销售税(RST)。然而,增值税/商品及服务税固有的进项增值税抵免促进了某些特定类型的税务欺诈,这在流转税或RST系统中是不存在的,特别是因为商业客户获得税收抵免的权利通常不取决于供应商事先支付相应的增值税/商品及服务税责任。随之而来的“增值税差距”引发了欧盟内部的争论,即增值税是否应该转变为所谓的“一般反向收费制度”,即在保留增值税系统的发票和审计跟踪的同时,相当于RST。改革项目最近获得了动力,因为委员会提出了一项建议,允许有意愿的会员国暂时适用一种普遍的反向收费机制。本文讨论了这种混合系统的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Hybrid’ forms of taxing consumption: A viable alternative to EU VAT?
In the last decades, VAT/GST systems have proliferated across the globe and have usually replaced any eventual cumulative turnover taxes or retail sales taxes (RST) previously operated in the respective country of adoption. However, the input VAT credit inherent to a VAT/GST facilitates some particular types of tax fraud which are absent in a turnover tax or RST system, especially because the entitlement of the business customer to the tax credit is normally not contingent upon the prior payment of the corresponding VAT/GST liability by the supplier. The ensuing ‘VAT gap’ has fueled the debate in the EU whether VAT should be transformed into a so-called ‘general reverse charge regime’ that would be equivalent to a RST while maintaining the invoice and audit trail of a VAT system . The reform project has gained momentum recently due to a proposal by the Commission which would allow the temporary application of a generalised reverse charge mechanism by Member States that so desire. This article discusses the pros and cons of such a hybrid system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equality under State aid rules and VAT The direct and immediate link with specialised services contracts as a measure for the right to deduct input VAT and the uncertainty in European tax law VAT deduction and member state sovereignty: (still) a good idea? EU VAT at the dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution* VAT information asymmetries in the context of intra-EU trade in goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1