{"title":"MPLS中叶子起始点到多点树的优化研究","authors":"M. Chaitou, J. L. Roux","doi":"10.1109/ICNS.2008.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resource ReSerVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE), and Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) may be used to set up Point to Multi Point (P2MP) trees in MPLS. RSVP-TE performs better in optimizing network resources, while LDP is simpler but has no guarantee on resource optimization. This paper presents a comparative study between RSVP-TE and LDP in regards of resource optimization and the resulting impact on the amount of memory consumed. It shows that the amount of memory needed in the case of RSVP-TE grows linearly as the size of the tree increases. In contrast, an approximate constant behavior is observed in the case of LDP, yielding an important scalability property. The paper then proposes two extension to LDP aiming to achieve better resource optimization. In both extension, a new leaf is provided a partial tree knowledge, by involving either all the nodes of the tree or only its leaves. The leaf joins the tree by connecting to the closest node among the known ones. Valuable comparisons with RSVP-TE are performed, and they represent an important background to decide when and how to use each protocol.","PeriodicalId":180899,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Conference on Networking and Services (icns 2008)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Optimizing Leaf Initiated Point to Multi Point Trees in MPLS\",\"authors\":\"M. Chaitou, J. L. Roux\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNS.2008.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resource ReSerVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE), and Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) may be used to set up Point to Multi Point (P2MP) trees in MPLS. RSVP-TE performs better in optimizing network resources, while LDP is simpler but has no guarantee on resource optimization. This paper presents a comparative study between RSVP-TE and LDP in regards of resource optimization and the resulting impact on the amount of memory consumed. It shows that the amount of memory needed in the case of RSVP-TE grows linearly as the size of the tree increases. In contrast, an approximate constant behavior is observed in the case of LDP, yielding an important scalability property. The paper then proposes two extension to LDP aiming to achieve better resource optimization. In both extension, a new leaf is provided a partial tree knowledge, by involving either all the nodes of the tree or only its leaves. The leaf joins the tree by connecting to the closest node among the known ones. Valuable comparisons with RSVP-TE are performed, and they represent an important background to decide when and how to use each protocol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fourth International Conference on Networking and Services (icns 2008)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fourth International Conference on Networking and Services (icns 2008)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS.2008.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Conference on Networking and Services (icns 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS.2008.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
在MPLS中,可以使用RSVP-TE (Resource ReSerVation Protocol- traffic Engineering)协议和LDP (Label Distribution Protocol)协议建立P2MP (Point to Multi Point)树。RSVP-TE在优化网络资源方面表现更好,而LDP更简单,但不能保证资源的优化。本文介绍了RSVP-TE和LDP在资源优化方面的比较研究以及由此产生的对内存消耗量的影响。它表明,在RSVP-TE的情况下,所需的内存量随着树大小的增加而线性增长。相反,在LDP的情况下观察到一个近似的常数行为,产生一个重要的可伸缩性属性。为了实现更好的资源优化,本文对LDP进行了两种扩展。在这两种扩展中,通过涉及树的所有节点或仅涉及树的叶子,为新的叶子提供部分树知识。叶子通过连接到已知节点中最近的节点来加入树。与RSVP-TE进行了有价值的比较,它们代表了决定何时以及如何使用每种协议的重要背景。
On Optimizing Leaf Initiated Point to Multi Point Trees in MPLS
Resource ReSerVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE), and Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) may be used to set up Point to Multi Point (P2MP) trees in MPLS. RSVP-TE performs better in optimizing network resources, while LDP is simpler but has no guarantee on resource optimization. This paper presents a comparative study between RSVP-TE and LDP in regards of resource optimization and the resulting impact on the amount of memory consumed. It shows that the amount of memory needed in the case of RSVP-TE grows linearly as the size of the tree increases. In contrast, an approximate constant behavior is observed in the case of LDP, yielding an important scalability property. The paper then proposes two extension to LDP aiming to achieve better resource optimization. In both extension, a new leaf is provided a partial tree knowledge, by involving either all the nodes of the tree or only its leaves. The leaf joins the tree by connecting to the closest node among the known ones. Valuable comparisons with RSVP-TE are performed, and they represent an important background to decide when and how to use each protocol.