{"title":"两相分布观测问题","authors":"S. Tripakis","doi":"10.1109/ACSD.2005.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce and study problems of distributed observation with bounded or unbounded memory. We are given a system modeled as a finite-word language L over some finite alphabet /spl Sigma/ and subalphabets /spl Sigma//sub 1/,..., /spl Sigma//sub n/ of /spl Sigma/ modeling n distinct observation points. We want to build (when there exist) n observers which collect projections of a behavior in L onto /spl Sigma//sub 1/,..., /spl Sigma//sub n/, then send them to a central decision point. The latter must determine whether the original behavior was in a given K /spl sube/ L. In the unbounded-memory case, observers record the entire sequence they observe. In the bounded-memory case, they are required to be finite-state automata. We show that, when L is trace-closed with respect to the usual dependence relation induced by /spl Sigma//sub 1/,..., /spl Sigma//sub n/, unbounded-memory observability is equivalent to K being centrally observable and trace-closed, thus decidable. When L is not trace-closed, the problem is undecidable, even if K and L are regular. We also show that bounded-memory observability is equivalent to unbounded-memory observability (thus decidable) when L is trace-closed and /spl Sigma//sub i/ are pairwise disjoint. Otherwise, the problem remains open. In the decidable cases, observers and decision function can be automatically synthesized.","PeriodicalId":279517,"journal":{"name":"Fifth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD'05)","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-phase distributed observation problems\",\"authors\":\"S. Tripakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSD.2005.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce and study problems of distributed observation with bounded or unbounded memory. We are given a system modeled as a finite-word language L over some finite alphabet /spl Sigma/ and subalphabets /spl Sigma//sub 1/,..., /spl Sigma//sub n/ of /spl Sigma/ modeling n distinct observation points. We want to build (when there exist) n observers which collect projections of a behavior in L onto /spl Sigma//sub 1/,..., /spl Sigma//sub n/, then send them to a central decision point. The latter must determine whether the original behavior was in a given K /spl sube/ L. In the unbounded-memory case, observers record the entire sequence they observe. In the bounded-memory case, they are required to be finite-state automata. We show that, when L is trace-closed with respect to the usual dependence relation induced by /spl Sigma//sub 1/,..., /spl Sigma//sub n/, unbounded-memory observability is equivalent to K being centrally observable and trace-closed, thus decidable. When L is not trace-closed, the problem is undecidable, even if K and L are regular. We also show that bounded-memory observability is equivalent to unbounded-memory observability (thus decidable) when L is trace-closed and /spl Sigma//sub i/ are pairwise disjoint. Otherwise, the problem remains open. In the decidable cases, observers and decision function can be automatically synthesized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD'05)\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2005.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2005.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We introduce and study problems of distributed observation with bounded or unbounded memory. We are given a system modeled as a finite-word language L over some finite alphabet /spl Sigma/ and subalphabets /spl Sigma//sub 1/,..., /spl Sigma//sub n/ of /spl Sigma/ modeling n distinct observation points. We want to build (when there exist) n observers which collect projections of a behavior in L onto /spl Sigma//sub 1/,..., /spl Sigma//sub n/, then send them to a central decision point. The latter must determine whether the original behavior was in a given K /spl sube/ L. In the unbounded-memory case, observers record the entire sequence they observe. In the bounded-memory case, they are required to be finite-state automata. We show that, when L is trace-closed with respect to the usual dependence relation induced by /spl Sigma//sub 1/,..., /spl Sigma//sub n/, unbounded-memory observability is equivalent to K being centrally observable and trace-closed, thus decidable. When L is not trace-closed, the problem is undecidable, even if K and L are regular. We also show that bounded-memory observability is equivalent to unbounded-memory observability (thus decidable) when L is trace-closed and /spl Sigma//sub i/ are pairwise disjoint. Otherwise, the problem remains open. In the decidable cases, observers and decision function can be automatically synthesized.