对TLSH相似摘要方案的实际攻击

Gábor Fuchs, Roland Nagy, L. Buttyán
{"title":"对TLSH相似摘要方案的实际攻击","authors":"Gábor Fuchs, Roland Nagy, L. Buttyán","doi":"10.1145/3600160.3600173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Similarity digest schemes are used in various applications (e.g., digital forensics, spam filtering, malware clustering, and malware detection), which require them to be resistant to attacks aiming at generating semantically similar inputs that have very different similarity digest values. In this paper, we show that TLSH, a widely used similarity digest function, is not sufficiently robust against such attacks. More specifically, we propose an automated method for modifying executable files (binaries), such that the modified binary has the exact same functionality as the original one, it also remains syntactically similar to the original one, yet, the TLSH difference score between the original and the modified binaries becomes high. We evaluate our method on a large data set containing malware binaries, and we also show that it can be used effectively to generate adversarial samples that evade detection by SIMBIoTA, a recently proposed similarity-based malware detection approach.","PeriodicalId":107145,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Practical Attack on the TLSH Similarity Digest Scheme\",\"authors\":\"Gábor Fuchs, Roland Nagy, L. Buttyán\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3600160.3600173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Similarity digest schemes are used in various applications (e.g., digital forensics, spam filtering, malware clustering, and malware detection), which require them to be resistant to attacks aiming at generating semantically similar inputs that have very different similarity digest values. In this paper, we show that TLSH, a widely used similarity digest function, is not sufficiently robust against such attacks. More specifically, we propose an automated method for modifying executable files (binaries), such that the modified binary has the exact same functionality as the original one, it also remains syntactically similar to the original one, yet, the TLSH difference score between the original and the modified binaries becomes high. We evaluate our method on a large data set containing malware binaries, and we also show that it can be used effectively to generate adversarial samples that evade detection by SIMBIoTA, a recently proposed similarity-based malware detection approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3600173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3600173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相似摘要方案用于各种应用程序(例如,数字取证、垃圾邮件过滤、恶意软件集群和恶意软件检测),这要求它们能够抵抗旨在生成具有非常不同相似摘要值的语义相似输入的攻击。在本文中,我们证明了广泛使用的相似摘要函数TLSH对此类攻击的鲁棒性不够。更具体地说,我们提出了一种自动化的方法来修改可执行文件(二进制文件),这样修改后的二进制文件具有与原始文件完全相同的功能,在语法上也与原始文件相似,但是,原始和修改后的二进制文件之间的TLSH差值变得很高。我们在包含恶意软件二进制文件的大型数据集上评估了我们的方法,并且我们还表明它可以有效地用于生成对抗性样本,从而逃避SIMBIoTA(最近提出的基于相似性的恶意软件检测方法)的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Practical Attack on the TLSH Similarity Digest Scheme
Similarity digest schemes are used in various applications (e.g., digital forensics, spam filtering, malware clustering, and malware detection), which require them to be resistant to attacks aiming at generating semantically similar inputs that have very different similarity digest values. In this paper, we show that TLSH, a widely used similarity digest function, is not sufficiently robust against such attacks. More specifically, we propose an automated method for modifying executable files (binaries), such that the modified binary has the exact same functionality as the original one, it also remains syntactically similar to the original one, yet, the TLSH difference score between the original and the modified binaries becomes high. We evaluate our method on a large data set containing malware binaries, and we also show that it can be used effectively to generate adversarial samples that evade detection by SIMBIoTA, a recently proposed similarity-based malware detection approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Confidential Quantum Computing Enabling Qualified Anonymity for Enhanced User Privacy in the Digital Era Fingerprint forgery training: Easy to learn, hard to perform Experiences with Secure Pipelines in Highly Regulated Environments Leveraging Knowledge Graphs For Classifying Incident Situations in ICT Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1