为测试分解创建模拟对象

David Saff, Michael D. Ernst
{"title":"为测试分解创建模拟对象","authors":"David Saff, Michael D. Ernst","doi":"10.1145/996821.996838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test factoring creates fast, focused unit tests from slow system-wide tests; each new unit test exercises only a subset of the functionality exercised by the system tests. Augmenting a test suite with factored unit tests, and prioritizing the tests, should catch errors earlier in a test run.One way to factor a test is to introduce mock objects. If a test exercises a component A, which is designed to issue queries against or mutate another component B, the implementation of B can be replaced by a mock. The mock has two purposes: it checks that A's calls to B are as expected, and it simulates B's behavior in response. Given a system test for A and B, and a record of A's and B's behavior when the system test is run, we would like to automatically generate unit tests for A in which B is mocked. The factored tests can isolate bugs in A from bugs in B and, if B is slow or expensive, improve test performance or cost.This paper motivates test factoring with an illustrative example, proposes a simple procedure for automatically generating mock objects for factored tests, and gives examples of how the procedure can be extended to produce more robust factored tests.","PeriodicalId":318802,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT workshop on Program analysis for software tools and engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mock object creation for test factoring\",\"authors\":\"David Saff, Michael D. Ernst\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/996821.996838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Test factoring creates fast, focused unit tests from slow system-wide tests; each new unit test exercises only a subset of the functionality exercised by the system tests. Augmenting a test suite with factored unit tests, and prioritizing the tests, should catch errors earlier in a test run.One way to factor a test is to introduce mock objects. If a test exercises a component A, which is designed to issue queries against or mutate another component B, the implementation of B can be replaced by a mock. The mock has two purposes: it checks that A's calls to B are as expected, and it simulates B's behavior in response. Given a system test for A and B, and a record of A's and B's behavior when the system test is run, we would like to automatically generate unit tests for A in which B is mocked. The factored tests can isolate bugs in A from bugs in B and, if B is slow or expensive, improve test performance or cost.This paper motivates test factoring with an illustrative example, proposes a simple procedure for automatically generating mock objects for factored tests, and gives examples of how the procedure can be extended to produce more robust factored tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT workshop on Program analysis for software tools and engineering\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT workshop on Program analysis for software tools and engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/996821.996838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT workshop on Program analysis for software tools and engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/996821.996838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

测试分解从缓慢的系统范围测试中创建快速、集中的单元测试;每个新的单元测试只执行系统测试所执行的功能的一个子集。使用分解单元测试来扩充测试套件,并对测试进行优先级排序,应该可以在测试运行中更早地捕获错误。分解测试的一种方法是引入模拟对象。如果测试执行组件a,而组件a的设计目的是对另一个组件B发出查询或改变其他组件B,则B的实现可以用模拟代替。模拟有两个目的:检查A对B的调用是否符合预期,并模拟B的响应行为。给定a和B的系统测试,以及在系统测试运行时a和B的行为记录,我们想要自动为a生成单元测试,其中B是模拟的。因子测试可以将A中的错误与B中的错误隔离开来,如果B速度慢或成本高,则可以提高测试性能或成本。本文通过一个说明性示例来激励测试分解,提出了一个自动为分解测试生成模拟对象的简单过程,并给出了如何扩展该过程以生成更健壮的分解测试的示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mock object creation for test factoring
Test factoring creates fast, focused unit tests from slow system-wide tests; each new unit test exercises only a subset of the functionality exercised by the system tests. Augmenting a test suite with factored unit tests, and prioritizing the tests, should catch errors earlier in a test run.One way to factor a test is to introduce mock objects. If a test exercises a component A, which is designed to issue queries against or mutate another component B, the implementation of B can be replaced by a mock. The mock has two purposes: it checks that A's calls to B are as expected, and it simulates B's behavior in response. Given a system test for A and B, and a record of A's and B's behavior when the system test is run, we would like to automatically generate unit tests for A in which B is mocked. The factored tests can isolate bugs in A from bugs in B and, if B is slow or expensive, improve test performance or cost.This paper motivates test factoring with an illustrative example, proposes a simple procedure for automatically generating mock objects for factored tests, and gives examples of how the procedure can be extended to produce more robust factored tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The design and implementation of FIT: a flexible instrumentation toolkit Resolving and applying constraint queries on context-sensitive analyses Elided conditionals An improved slicer for Java Invited Talk: "Model checking" software with VeriSoft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1