董事会投票加密协议的效率评估

O. Kulyk, Stephan Neumann, Jurlind Budurushi, M. Volkamer, R. Haenni, Reto E. Koenig, Philémon von Bergen
{"title":"董事会投票加密协议的效率评估","authors":"O. Kulyk, Stephan Neumann, Jurlind Budurushi, M. Volkamer, R. Haenni, Reto E. Koenig, Philémon von Bergen","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2015.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficiency is the bottleneck of many cryptographic protocols towards their practical application in different contexts. This holds true also in the context of electronic voting, where cryptographic protocols are used to ensure a diversity of security requirements, e.g. Secrecy and integrity of cast votes. A new and promising application area of electronic voting is boardroom voting, which in practice takes place very frequently and often on simple issues such as approving or refusing a budget. Hence, it is not a surprise that a number of cryptographic protocols for boardroom voting have been already proposed. In this work, we introduce a security model adequate for the boardroom voting context. Further, we evaluate the efficiency of four boardroom voting protocols, which to best of our knowledge are the only boardroom voting protocols that satisfy our security model. Finally, we compare the performance of these protocols in different election settings.","PeriodicalId":331539,"journal":{"name":"2015 10th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency Evaluation of Cryptographic Protocols for Boardroom Voting\",\"authors\":\"O. Kulyk, Stephan Neumann, Jurlind Budurushi, M. Volkamer, R. Haenni, Reto E. Koenig, Philémon von Bergen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARES.2015.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Efficiency is the bottleneck of many cryptographic protocols towards their practical application in different contexts. This holds true also in the context of electronic voting, where cryptographic protocols are used to ensure a diversity of security requirements, e.g. Secrecy and integrity of cast votes. A new and promising application area of electronic voting is boardroom voting, which in practice takes place very frequently and often on simple issues such as approving or refusing a budget. Hence, it is not a surprise that a number of cryptographic protocols for boardroom voting have been already proposed. In this work, we introduce a security model adequate for the boardroom voting context. Further, we evaluate the efficiency of four boardroom voting protocols, which to best of our knowledge are the only boardroom voting protocols that satisfy our security model. Finally, we compare the performance of these protocols in different election settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 10th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 10th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2015.75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 10th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2015.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

效率是制约许多加密协议在不同环境下实际应用的瓶颈。在电子投票的背景下也是如此,其中使用加密协议来确保各种安全要求,例如投票的保密性和完整性。电子投票的一个新的和有前途的应用领域是董事会投票,它在实践中经常发生,通常是在批准或拒绝预算等简单问题上。因此,已经提出了许多用于董事会投票的加密协议也就不足为奇了。在这项工作中,我们引入了一个适合董事会投票环境的安全模型。此外,我们评估了四个董事会投票协议的效率,据我们所知,这是唯一满足我们的安全模型的董事会投票协议。最后,我们比较了这些协议在不同选举设置下的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency Evaluation of Cryptographic Protocols for Boardroom Voting
Efficiency is the bottleneck of many cryptographic protocols towards their practical application in different contexts. This holds true also in the context of electronic voting, where cryptographic protocols are used to ensure a diversity of security requirements, e.g. Secrecy and integrity of cast votes. A new and promising application area of electronic voting is boardroom voting, which in practice takes place very frequently and often on simple issues such as approving or refusing a budget. Hence, it is not a surprise that a number of cryptographic protocols for boardroom voting have been already proposed. In this work, we introduce a security model adequate for the boardroom voting context. Further, we evaluate the efficiency of four boardroom voting protocols, which to best of our knowledge are the only boardroom voting protocols that satisfy our security model. Finally, we compare the performance of these protocols in different election settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role and Security of Firewalls in IaaS Cloud Computing Intensifying State Surveillance of Electronic Communications: A Legal Solution in Addressing Extremism or Not? Countermeasures for Covert Channel-Internal Control Protocols A Performance Evaluation of Hash Functions for IP Reputation Lookup Using Bloom Filters Advanced Attribute-Based Key Management for Mobile Devices in Hybrid Clouds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1