QCKer

Joven L. Pernez, R. Uy, Kaizen Vinz A. Borja, Jan Carlo G. Maghirang
{"title":"QCKer","authors":"Joven L. Pernez, R. Uy, Kaizen Vinz A. Borja, Jan Carlo G. Maghirang","doi":"10.1145/3383783.3383806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the implementation of the q-gram counting filter using x86-AVX/AVX2 SIMD instructions. There are three novel findings during the course of the research work. First, to eliminate inconsistency between the theoretical and experimental result, synthetic reads are generated using DNA character \"T\" only since generated synthetic reads create a random condition in which the number of seed instances is variable, and thus cannot be predicted. Second, the presence and absence of various SIMD parameters namely, prefetch, multithreading and AVX instruction sets are introduced to determine the speed factor. Result shows that there is a 2% speedup with the presence of prefetching, a 2.7% speedup with the presence of AVX instruction sets, a 100.41% speedup with the presence of multithreading, and a 112.25%) speedup if all parameters are used. This shows that multithreading has the biggest effect among the said parameters. Third, the x86-AVX is compared with Razers3, an existing read mapper using q-gram counting filter. In terms of filter only, the x86-AVX is 12x faster than the Razers3 for small seed size of 4. Though, Razers3 outperforms the x86-AVX implementation for longer seed (i.e., seed size of 12). This is attributed to Razers3 being optimized for q-gram of 12 or higher. From these findings, it is recommended that using real datasets is preferred over synthetic datasets. Also, implementation using multithreading approach is recommended. Though future work can be done to compare multithread with FPGA implementation.","PeriodicalId":129894,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Bioinformatics Research and Applications","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QCKer\",\"authors\":\"Joven L. Pernez, R. Uy, Kaizen Vinz A. Borja, Jan Carlo G. Maghirang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3383783.3383806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents the implementation of the q-gram counting filter using x86-AVX/AVX2 SIMD instructions. There are three novel findings during the course of the research work. First, to eliminate inconsistency between the theoretical and experimental result, synthetic reads are generated using DNA character \\\"T\\\" only since generated synthetic reads create a random condition in which the number of seed instances is variable, and thus cannot be predicted. Second, the presence and absence of various SIMD parameters namely, prefetch, multithreading and AVX instruction sets are introduced to determine the speed factor. Result shows that there is a 2% speedup with the presence of prefetching, a 2.7% speedup with the presence of AVX instruction sets, a 100.41% speedup with the presence of multithreading, and a 112.25%) speedup if all parameters are used. This shows that multithreading has the biggest effect among the said parameters. Third, the x86-AVX is compared with Razers3, an existing read mapper using q-gram counting filter. In terms of filter only, the x86-AVX is 12x faster than the Razers3 for small seed size of 4. Though, Razers3 outperforms the x86-AVX implementation for longer seed (i.e., seed size of 12). This is attributed to Razers3 being optimized for q-gram of 12 or higher. From these findings, it is recommended that using real datasets is preferred over synthetic datasets. Also, implementation using multithreading approach is recommended. Though future work can be done to compare multithread with FPGA implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Bioinformatics Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Bioinformatics Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3383783.3383806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Bioinformatics Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3383783.3383806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
QCKer
The paper presents the implementation of the q-gram counting filter using x86-AVX/AVX2 SIMD instructions. There are three novel findings during the course of the research work. First, to eliminate inconsistency between the theoretical and experimental result, synthetic reads are generated using DNA character "T" only since generated synthetic reads create a random condition in which the number of seed instances is variable, and thus cannot be predicted. Second, the presence and absence of various SIMD parameters namely, prefetch, multithreading and AVX instruction sets are introduced to determine the speed factor. Result shows that there is a 2% speedup with the presence of prefetching, a 2.7% speedup with the presence of AVX instruction sets, a 100.41% speedup with the presence of multithreading, and a 112.25%) speedup if all parameters are used. This shows that multithreading has the biggest effect among the said parameters. Third, the x86-AVX is compared with Razers3, an existing read mapper using q-gram counting filter. In terms of filter only, the x86-AVX is 12x faster than the Razers3 for small seed size of 4. Though, Razers3 outperforms the x86-AVX implementation for longer seed (i.e., seed size of 12). This is attributed to Razers3 being optimized for q-gram of 12 or higher. From these findings, it is recommended that using real datasets is preferred over synthetic datasets. Also, implementation using multithreading approach is recommended. Though future work can be done to compare multithread with FPGA implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
QCKer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1