重新审视磁盘调度:O(n2)算法可以竞争吗?

ACM-SE 35 Pub Date : 1997-04-02 DOI:10.1145/2817460.2817473
R. Geist, R. Ross
{"title":"重新审视磁盘调度:O(n2)算法可以竞争吗?","authors":"R. Geist, R. Ross","doi":"10.1145/2817460.2817473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A simple O(n2) disk scheduling algorithm is suggested, and its performance on a real system, an Intel P6-based system running Linux 2.0.18, is compared with that of standard O(n) scheduling algorithms, with the aim of determining whether the large disparity between processor speeds and disk speeds might now allow for improved disk scheduling under heavy loads. The simple O(n2) algorithm is seen to provide some modest performance improvements over the best linear algorithms. The study also identifies several areas where potentially large additional performance improvements may be found by extending the framework suggested here.","PeriodicalId":274966,"journal":{"name":"ACM-SE 35","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disk scheduling revisited: can O(n2) algorithms compete?\",\"authors\":\"R. Geist, R. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2817460.2817473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A simple O(n2) disk scheduling algorithm is suggested, and its performance on a real system, an Intel P6-based system running Linux 2.0.18, is compared with that of standard O(n) scheduling algorithms, with the aim of determining whether the large disparity between processor speeds and disk speeds might now allow for improved disk scheduling under heavy loads. The simple O(n2) algorithm is seen to provide some modest performance improvements over the best linear algorithms. The study also identifies several areas where potentially large additional performance improvements may be found by extending the framework suggested here.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM-SE 35\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM-SE 35\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2817460.2817473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM-SE 35","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2817460.2817473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文提出了一种简单的O(n2)磁盘调度算法,并将其在一个实际系统(一个运行Linux 2.0.18的基于Intel p6的系统)上的性能与标准O(n)调度算法进行了比较,目的是确定处理器速度和磁盘速度之间的巨大差异现在是否允许在高负载下改进磁盘调度。与最好的线性算法相比,简单的O(n2)算法提供了一些适度的性能改进。该研究还确定了几个领域,通过扩展这里建议的框架,可能会发现潜在的巨大的额外性能改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disk scheduling revisited: can O(n2) algorithms compete?
A simple O(n2) disk scheduling algorithm is suggested, and its performance on a real system, an Intel P6-based system running Linux 2.0.18, is compared with that of standard O(n) scheduling algorithms, with the aim of determining whether the large disparity between processor speeds and disk speeds might now allow for improved disk scheduling under heavy loads. The simple O(n2) algorithm is seen to provide some modest performance improvements over the best linear algorithms. The study also identifies several areas where potentially large additional performance improvements may be found by extending the framework suggested here.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving the identification of verbs Constructing Delaunay triangulation on the Intel Paragon Software agents and the role of market protocols Interactive Petri net simulation Hybrid evolutionary path planning via visibility-based repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1