{"title":"有些黑盒子是肉做的;还有一些是由硅制成的","authors":"Tobias Mast","doi":"10.5771/2747-5174-2022-2-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated decisions, especially those that operate using AI, face accusations of being opaque black boxes. This accusation is to be taken seriously, but it is put into perspective to a certain extent if one contrasts it with the criticism of human-generated reasoning for decisions in the judiciary and administration. This article explains the functions that decision rationales fulfill from the perspective of legal scholarship and examines the qualities and shortcomings of human and machine approaches.","PeriodicalId":377128,"journal":{"name":"Morals & Machines","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Black Boxes are made of Flesh; Others are made of Silicon\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Mast\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/2747-5174-2022-2-64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automated decisions, especially those that operate using AI, face accusations of being opaque black boxes. This accusation is to be taken seriously, but it is put into perspective to a certain extent if one contrasts it with the criticism of human-generated reasoning for decisions in the judiciary and administration. This article explains the functions that decision rationales fulfill from the perspective of legal scholarship and examines the qualities and shortcomings of human and machine approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Morals & Machines\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Morals & Machines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/2747-5174-2022-2-64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Morals & Machines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2747-5174-2022-2-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Some Black Boxes are made of Flesh; Others are made of Silicon
Automated decisions, especially those that operate using AI, face accusations of being opaque black boxes. This accusation is to be taken seriously, but it is put into perspective to a certain extent if one contrasts it with the criticism of human-generated reasoning for decisions in the judiciary and administration. This article explains the functions that decision rationales fulfill from the perspective of legal scholarship and examines the qualities and shortcomings of human and machine approaches.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
