社区治疗令

Jorun Rugkåsa, Tom Burns
{"title":"社区治疗令","authors":"Jorun Rugkåsa,&nbsp;Tom Burns","doi":"10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In 2008, Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) became available under the amended Mental Health Act 2007 as a means of supervizing people with severe mental disorders<span> in the community following involuntary hospital stays. The orders were intended to prevent relapse following discharge from hospital by requiring the patient to comply with treatment. Patients can be recalled to hospital should they not comply. The introduction of CTOs has been subject to fierce debate, which is still ongoing. This is, in part, due to a lack of convincing evidence for efficacy. The guidance from the Department of Health and from some NHS Trusts seems to favour CTOs over other means of supporting patients in the community. Early figures indicate that CTOs have already been used extensively, despite a lack of evidence to guide clinical practice. A few teething problems have been identified such as the availability of Second Opinion Appointed Doctors and the ways in which services are organized, which impacts on CTO implementation and continuity of care. Experimental research to identify for whom and in what ways CTOs may have benefits is sorely needed to aid clinical decision making.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":88653,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","volume":"8 12","pages":"Pages 493-495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.009","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community treatment orders\",\"authors\":\"Jorun Rugkåsa,&nbsp;Tom Burns\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In 2008, Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) became available under the amended Mental Health Act 2007 as a means of supervizing people with severe mental disorders<span> in the community following involuntary hospital stays. The orders were intended to prevent relapse following discharge from hospital by requiring the patient to comply with treatment. Patients can be recalled to hospital should they not comply. The introduction of CTOs has been subject to fierce debate, which is still ongoing. This is, in part, due to a lack of convincing evidence for efficacy. The guidance from the Department of Health and from some NHS Trusts seems to favour CTOs over other means of supporting patients in the community. Early figures indicate that CTOs have already been used extensively, despite a lack of evidence to guide clinical practice. A few teething problems have been identified such as the availability of Second Opinion Appointed Doctors and the ways in which services are organized, which impacts on CTO implementation and continuity of care. Experimental research to identify for whom and in what ways CTOs may have benefits is sorely needed to aid clinical decision making.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)\",\"volume\":\"8 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 493-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.009\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476179309002080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476179309002080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

2008年,《社区治疗令》根据经修订的《2007年精神卫生法》生效,作为监督社区中非自愿住院治疗的严重精神障碍患者的一种手段。这些命令旨在通过要求患者遵守治疗来防止出院后复发。如果患者不遵守规定,可将其召回医院。引进首席技术官一直受到激烈的争论,争论仍在进行中。这在一定程度上是由于缺乏令人信服的有效性证据。来自卫生部和一些NHS信托基金的指导似乎更倾向于cto,而不是支持社区患者的其他方式。早期数据表明,尽管缺乏指导临床实践的证据,cto已经被广泛使用。已经确定了一些初期问题,如第二意见指定医生的可用性和服务的组织方式,这些问题影响到CTO的实施和护理的连续性。迫切需要进行实验研究,以确定cto对谁以及以何种方式可能受益,以帮助临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community treatment orders

In 2008, Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) became available under the amended Mental Health Act 2007 as a means of supervizing people with severe mental disorders in the community following involuntary hospital stays. The orders were intended to prevent relapse following discharge from hospital by requiring the patient to comply with treatment. Patients can be recalled to hospital should they not comply. The introduction of CTOs has been subject to fierce debate, which is still ongoing. This is, in part, due to a lack of convincing evidence for efficacy. The guidance from the Department of Health and from some NHS Trusts seems to favour CTOs over other means of supporting patients in the community. Early figures indicate that CTOs have already been used extensively, despite a lack of evidence to guide clinical practice. A few teething problems have been identified such as the availability of Second Opinion Appointed Doctors and the ways in which services are organized, which impacts on CTO implementation and continuity of care. Experimental research to identify for whom and in what ways CTOs may have benefits is sorely needed to aid clinical decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Mental illness, dangerousness and protecting society Personal autonomy and mental capacity The Mental Health Act and the Mental Capacity Act: untangling the relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1