视频喉镜气管内插管在心脏手术室-在孟加拉国外围三级医疗中心的经验

M. R. Chowdhury, Muhammad Abdul Quaium Chowdhury, J. D. Gupta, Subir Barua, M. Mannan, Mohammad Fazle Maruf, M. Rahman, Satyajit Dhar, N. Hosain
{"title":"视频喉镜气管内插管在心脏手术室-在孟加拉国外围三级医疗中心的经验","authors":"M. R. Chowdhury, Muhammad Abdul Quaium Chowdhury, J. D. Gupta, Subir Barua, M. Mannan, Mohammad Fazle Maruf, M. Rahman, Satyajit Dhar, N. Hosain","doi":"10.3329/bhj.v35i1.49142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Endotracheal intubation is an essential primary skill for all anesthesiologists. For cardiac anesthesiologists rapid and proper intubation is more important as failure may cause serious consequences. Video laryngoscope provides a better real time view of the larynx, epiglottis and vocal cords. It also keeps the intubating anesthetist away from the patient as compared to conventional laryngoscopy. This may be very important in this COVID-19 era. To the best of our knowledge the Department of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiac Anesthesia of Chattogram Medical College & Hospital is the first center in Bangladesh to introduce video laryngoscope in cardiac OT. \nThe objective of this study was aimed to compare the intubation time, hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy, success rates and operator’s comfort using the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and video laryngoscope in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. \nMaterials and Methods: A total of 60 adult patients were included in this comparative study, subjected to general anesthesia for cardiac surgery, intubated using either conventional Macintosh direct laryngoscope or video laryngoscope. Patients were intubated by 3 different consultant anesthesiologists with equal competency of our department. \nResults: There was not much difference between Video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy in terms of intubation time and success rate. Video laryngoscopy exhibited less hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation; however, the difference was not statistically significant in this small group of patients. Operators were much more comfortable with Video laryngoscope than conventional laryngoscope particularly with the cases of difficult intubation because of the better glottic view with the former. \nConclusion: Video laryngoscope is preferred by cardiac anesthetists because of better glottic view. \nBangladesh Heart Journal 2020; 35(1) : 47-53","PeriodicalId":247590,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video Laryngoscopic Endotracheal Intubation in Cardiac Operation Theater - Experience at a Peripheral Tertiary Healthcare Centre of Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Chowdhury, Muhammad Abdul Quaium Chowdhury, J. D. Gupta, Subir Barua, M. Mannan, Mohammad Fazle Maruf, M. Rahman, Satyajit Dhar, N. Hosain\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bhj.v35i1.49142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Endotracheal intubation is an essential primary skill for all anesthesiologists. For cardiac anesthesiologists rapid and proper intubation is more important as failure may cause serious consequences. Video laryngoscope provides a better real time view of the larynx, epiglottis and vocal cords. It also keeps the intubating anesthetist away from the patient as compared to conventional laryngoscopy. This may be very important in this COVID-19 era. To the best of our knowledge the Department of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiac Anesthesia of Chattogram Medical College & Hospital is the first center in Bangladesh to introduce video laryngoscope in cardiac OT. \\nThe objective of this study was aimed to compare the intubation time, hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy, success rates and operator’s comfort using the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and video laryngoscope in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. \\nMaterials and Methods: A total of 60 adult patients were included in this comparative study, subjected to general anesthesia for cardiac surgery, intubated using either conventional Macintosh direct laryngoscope or video laryngoscope. Patients were intubated by 3 different consultant anesthesiologists with equal competency of our department. \\nResults: There was not much difference between Video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy in terms of intubation time and success rate. Video laryngoscopy exhibited less hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation; however, the difference was not statistically significant in this small group of patients. Operators were much more comfortable with Video laryngoscope than conventional laryngoscope particularly with the cases of difficult intubation because of the better glottic view with the former. \\nConclusion: Video laryngoscope is preferred by cardiac anesthetists because of better glottic view. \\nBangladesh Heart Journal 2020; 35(1) : 47-53\",\"PeriodicalId\":247590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v35i1.49142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v35i1.49142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:气管插管是所有麻醉师的基本技能。对于心脏麻醉师来说,快速和正确的插管更为重要,因为失败可能会导致严重的后果。视频喉镜能更好地实时观察喉部、会厌和声带。与传统喉镜相比,它还使插管麻醉师远离患者。这在COVID-19时代可能非常重要。据我们所知,Chattogram医学院心脏外科和心脏麻醉科是孟加拉国第一个在心脏OT中引入视频喉镜的中心。本研究的目的是比较成人心脏手术患者在常规Macintosh喉镜和视频喉镜下插管时间、喉镜下血流动力学反应、成功率和操作者舒适度。材料与方法:本比较研究共纳入60例成人心脏手术全麻患者,采用传统Macintosh直接喉镜或视频喉镜插管。患者由3位具有同等能力的麻醉顾问医师插管。结果:视频喉镜与常规喉镜在插管时间和成功率方面无明显差异。视频喉镜下血流动力学反应低于喉镜和插管;然而,在这一小群患者中,差异没有统计学意义。视频喉镜比传统喉镜对插管困难的病例更为舒适,因为前者具有更好的声门视野。结论:视像喉镜能获得较好的声门视野,是心脏麻醉师的首选。孟加拉国心脏杂志2020;35(1): 47-53
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Video Laryngoscopic Endotracheal Intubation in Cardiac Operation Theater - Experience at a Peripheral Tertiary Healthcare Centre of Bangladesh
Background: Endotracheal intubation is an essential primary skill for all anesthesiologists. For cardiac anesthesiologists rapid and proper intubation is more important as failure may cause serious consequences. Video laryngoscope provides a better real time view of the larynx, epiglottis and vocal cords. It also keeps the intubating anesthetist away from the patient as compared to conventional laryngoscopy. This may be very important in this COVID-19 era. To the best of our knowledge the Department of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiac Anesthesia of Chattogram Medical College & Hospital is the first center in Bangladesh to introduce video laryngoscope in cardiac OT. The objective of this study was aimed to compare the intubation time, hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy, success rates and operator’s comfort using the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and video laryngoscope in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 adult patients were included in this comparative study, subjected to general anesthesia for cardiac surgery, intubated using either conventional Macintosh direct laryngoscope or video laryngoscope. Patients were intubated by 3 different consultant anesthesiologists with equal competency of our department. Results: There was not much difference between Video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy in terms of intubation time and success rate. Video laryngoscopy exhibited less hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation; however, the difference was not statistically significant in this small group of patients. Operators were much more comfortable with Video laryngoscope than conventional laryngoscope particularly with the cases of difficult intubation because of the better glottic view with the former. Conclusion: Video laryngoscope is preferred by cardiac anesthetists because of better glottic view. Bangladesh Heart Journal 2020; 35(1) : 47-53
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Established and Emerging Biomarker in Chronic Heart Failure Pulmonary Embolism Successfully Treated with Tenecteplase: A case report Determination of Values of the Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) In Bangladeshi Adult Patient With or Without LV Dysfunction Comparison of COVID-19 Infection Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients in Bangladesh During Second Wave: Single Centre Study Ultrasound Based Flow Measurements of the Left and Right Carotid System of Arteries in Bangladeshi Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1