爱达荷州综合可变能源发电系统的充分性评估

M. Papic, J. Ellsworth, A. Delgado, E. Schellenberg, G. Travis, G. Preston
{"title":"爱达荷州综合可变能源发电系统的充分性评估","authors":"M. Papic, J. Ellsworth, A. Delgado, E. Schellenberg, G. Travis, G. Preston","doi":"10.1109/PMAPS47429.2020.9183653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we move into the future, variable energy resources (VERs), such as wind and solar, will begin to dominate utilities resource portfolios. We see indicative signs of this in the western interconnection with utility Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) bypassing the natural gas \"bridge resource\" and identifying copious quantities of wind and solar in their 20-year plans as they work to retire increasing amounts of higher energy-cost fossil-based resources – especially coal. Adequacy assessment of systems with ongoing integration of VER, has added new requirements to enhance the current methodologies and tools for computing the widely-used Loss-of-Load-Expectation (LOLE) index. This paper presents the practical experience in evaluating the adequacy of the Idaho Power Company (IPC) generation system with integrated VER such as wind and solar. In this paper the adequacy assessment includes an analysis of uncertainties associated with load, limited energy sources (hydro), variable wind and solar energy sources, and forced and maintenance outages of generating units. The transmission contingency driven constraints have not been considered. The adequacy indexes, such as LOLE and Expected Unserved Energy (EUE), are calculated by using an analytical convolution approach that considers the realistic time series of available generation produced by VER, such as hydro, wind and solar. This paper explores, compares and presents the reliability results of four top Idaho IRPs portfolios that are selected among the 24 studied portfolios based on the cost and risk. The results suggest that the portfolio that includes a new transmission line, wind, and solar resources has the highest reliability and was one selected by IPC. In addition, the case study results indicate which wind and solar resources by location will provide more value in reducing LOLE index and show the impact of Load Forecast Uncertainty (LFU) on the LOLE and EUE indexes. The capacity contributions of future VER are also evaluated by using the Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) approach across five different meteorological profile years (2015-2019).","PeriodicalId":126918,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adequacy Assessment of the Idaho Power Generation System with Integrated Variable Energy Sources\",\"authors\":\"M. Papic, J. Ellsworth, A. Delgado, E. Schellenberg, G. Travis, G. Preston\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PMAPS47429.2020.9183653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As we move into the future, variable energy resources (VERs), such as wind and solar, will begin to dominate utilities resource portfolios. We see indicative signs of this in the western interconnection with utility Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) bypassing the natural gas \\\"bridge resource\\\" and identifying copious quantities of wind and solar in their 20-year plans as they work to retire increasing amounts of higher energy-cost fossil-based resources – especially coal. Adequacy assessment of systems with ongoing integration of VER, has added new requirements to enhance the current methodologies and tools for computing the widely-used Loss-of-Load-Expectation (LOLE) index. This paper presents the practical experience in evaluating the adequacy of the Idaho Power Company (IPC) generation system with integrated VER such as wind and solar. In this paper the adequacy assessment includes an analysis of uncertainties associated with load, limited energy sources (hydro), variable wind and solar energy sources, and forced and maintenance outages of generating units. The transmission contingency driven constraints have not been considered. The adequacy indexes, such as LOLE and Expected Unserved Energy (EUE), are calculated by using an analytical convolution approach that considers the realistic time series of available generation produced by VER, such as hydro, wind and solar. This paper explores, compares and presents the reliability results of four top Idaho IRPs portfolios that are selected among the 24 studied portfolios based on the cost and risk. The results suggest that the portfolio that includes a new transmission line, wind, and solar resources has the highest reliability and was one selected by IPC. In addition, the case study results indicate which wind and solar resources by location will provide more value in reducing LOLE index and show the impact of Load Forecast Uncertainty (LFU) on the LOLE and EUE indexes. The capacity contributions of future VER are also evaluated by using the Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) approach across five different meteorological profile years (2015-2019).\",\"PeriodicalId\":126918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMAPS47429.2020.9183653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMAPS47429.2020.9183653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着我们走向未来,风能和太阳能等可变能源(VERs)将开始主导公用事业资源组合。我们在西部电网的公用事业综合资源计划(irp)中看到了这方面的指示性迹象,该计划绕过天然气“桥梁资源”,并在其20年计划中确定了大量的风能和太阳能,因为他们正在努力淘汰越来越多的高能源成本化石资源——尤其是煤炭。对正在集成VER的系统进行充分性评估,增加了新的要求,以加强目前计算广泛使用的负荷预期损失指数的方法和工具。本文介绍了在评估爱达荷州电力公司(IPC)集成风能和太阳能等VER发电系统的充分性方面的实践经验。在本文中,充分性评估包括与负荷、有限能源(水电)、可变风能和太阳能以及发电机组的强制停机和维护停机相关的不确定性分析。没有考虑传输偶然性驱动的约束。充分性指数,如LOLE和预期未服务能源(EUE),是通过使用分析卷积方法计算的,该方法考虑了VER(如水力、风能和太阳能)产生的可用发电量的实际时间序列。本文根据成本和风险,对24个研究组合中选出的4个爱达荷州最佳irp组合的可靠性结果进行了探索、比较和展示。结果表明,包含新输电线路、风能和太阳能资源的投资组合具有最高的可靠性,并被IPC选中。此外,案例研究结果表明,不同位置的风能和太阳能资源对降低LOLE指数更有价值,并显示了负荷预测不确定性(LFU)对LOLE和EUE指数的影响。利用有效承载能力(ELCC)方法,对5个不同气象剖面年(2015-2019年)的未来VER容量贡献进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adequacy Assessment of the Idaho Power Generation System with Integrated Variable Energy Sources
As we move into the future, variable energy resources (VERs), such as wind and solar, will begin to dominate utilities resource portfolios. We see indicative signs of this in the western interconnection with utility Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) bypassing the natural gas "bridge resource" and identifying copious quantities of wind and solar in their 20-year plans as they work to retire increasing amounts of higher energy-cost fossil-based resources – especially coal. Adequacy assessment of systems with ongoing integration of VER, has added new requirements to enhance the current methodologies and tools for computing the widely-used Loss-of-Load-Expectation (LOLE) index. This paper presents the practical experience in evaluating the adequacy of the Idaho Power Company (IPC) generation system with integrated VER such as wind and solar. In this paper the adequacy assessment includes an analysis of uncertainties associated with load, limited energy sources (hydro), variable wind and solar energy sources, and forced and maintenance outages of generating units. The transmission contingency driven constraints have not been considered. The adequacy indexes, such as LOLE and Expected Unserved Energy (EUE), are calculated by using an analytical convolution approach that considers the realistic time series of available generation produced by VER, such as hydro, wind and solar. This paper explores, compares and presents the reliability results of four top Idaho IRPs portfolios that are selected among the 24 studied portfolios based on the cost and risk. The results suggest that the portfolio that includes a new transmission line, wind, and solar resources has the highest reliability and was one selected by IPC. In addition, the case study results indicate which wind and solar resources by location will provide more value in reducing LOLE index and show the impact of Load Forecast Uncertainty (LFU) on the LOLE and EUE indexes. The capacity contributions of future VER are also evaluated by using the Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) approach across five different meteorological profile years (2015-2019).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Operating Reserve Assessment in Systems with Energy Storage and Electric Vehicles Framework and methodology for active distribution grid planning in Norway Parallel GPU Implementation for Fast Generating System Adequacy Assessment via Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation Distribution System Planning Considering Power Quality, Loadability and Economic Aspects Modelling and Simulation of Uncertainty in the Placement of Distributed Energy Resources for Planning Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1