幻荣、曼潭、白蝙蝠保护区与菲迈文化之路:世界遗产背景下的比较研究与未来展望

Saowalux Poshyanandana
{"title":"幻荣、曼潭、白蝙蝠保护区与菲迈文化之路:世界遗产背景下的比较研究与未来展望","authors":"Saowalux Poshyanandana","doi":"10.1163/26659077-25010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe removal of “Phimai, its Cultural Route and the Associated Temples of Phanomroong and Muangtam” from the the World Heritage Tentative List in 2019 indicates the change of focus of the Thailand State Party away from this emsemble originally included as components of the Phimai cultural route. This paper discusses the reasons behind this change, the values and ouv as well as advantages and disadvantages of these two proposals in the context of World Heritage nomination. It concludes that the proposal of the Ensemble of Phanom Rung was made after work on nominating the Phimai cultural route faced management obstacles and disputes between the responsible organization and local people, rather than on the values of the cultural route itself. As for the ensemble, the main concern is that this serial cultural heritage site still requires extensive study to justify the proposed criteria. Therefore, the Phimai cultural route, with its advantages in strong and verifiable values, may be reconsidered for World Heritage nomination when management issues are resolved.","PeriodicalId":443443,"journal":{"name":"MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ensemble of Phanom Rung, Muang Tam and Plai Bat Sanctuaries and the Phimai Cultural Route: Comparative Study and Future Expectation in World Heritage Context\",\"authors\":\"Saowalux Poshyanandana\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/26659077-25010004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe removal of “Phimai, its Cultural Route and the Associated Temples of Phanomroong and Muangtam” from the the World Heritage Tentative List in 2019 indicates the change of focus of the Thailand State Party away from this emsemble originally included as components of the Phimai cultural route. This paper discusses the reasons behind this change, the values and ouv as well as advantages and disadvantages of these two proposals in the context of World Heritage nomination. It concludes that the proposal of the Ensemble of Phanom Rung was made after work on nominating the Phimai cultural route faced management obstacles and disputes between the responsible organization and local people, rather than on the values of the cultural route itself. As for the ensemble, the main concern is that this serial cultural heritage site still requires extensive study to justify the proposed criteria. Therefore, the Phimai cultural route, with its advantages in strong and verifiable values, may be reconsidered for World Heritage nomination when management issues are resolved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-25010004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-25010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2019年从《世界遗产暂定名录》中删除“菲迈及其文化路线及相关的法隆寺和芒潭寺”,表明泰国缔约国将重点从最初作为菲迈文化路线组成部分的这一建筑群转移。本文讨论了这一变化背后的原因,在世界遗产申报的背景下,这两项提案的价值和价值以及优缺点。其结论是,在菲迈文化路线的提名工作面临管理障碍和负责组织与当地人民之间的纠纷后,而不是文化路线本身的价值,提出了“幻影龙剧团”的建议。至于整体,主要关注的是这个系列文化遗产遗址仍然需要广泛的研究来证明拟议的标准是正确的。因此,当管理问题得到解决时,可能会重新考虑将具有强烈和可验证价值的菲迈文化路线列入世界遗产名录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ensemble of Phanom Rung, Muang Tam and Plai Bat Sanctuaries and the Phimai Cultural Route: Comparative Study and Future Expectation in World Heritage Context
The removal of “Phimai, its Cultural Route and the Associated Temples of Phanomroong and Muangtam” from the the World Heritage Tentative List in 2019 indicates the change of focus of the Thailand State Party away from this emsemble originally included as components of the Phimai cultural route. This paper discusses the reasons behind this change, the values and ouv as well as advantages and disadvantages of these two proposals in the context of World Heritage nomination. It concludes that the proposal of the Ensemble of Phanom Rung was made after work on nominating the Phimai cultural route faced management obstacles and disputes between the responsible organization and local people, rather than on the values of the cultural route itself. As for the ensemble, the main concern is that this serial cultural heritage site still requires extensive study to justify the proposed criteria. Therefore, the Phimai cultural route, with its advantages in strong and verifiable values, may be reconsidered for World Heritage nomination when management issues are resolved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Anarchy” against “Order”: French Elite Perception of the Conflict in Manchuria Revisiting Pan-Asianism in the Decolonization of the Indo-Pacific: Inspiration, Order, and Democratization Military Study Abroad as Thailand’s Foreign Policy Between the 1930s–1940s Prince Wan Waithayakon’s Attempt for Rapprochement with the People’s Republic of China at the 1955 Asian-African Conference at Bandung The Ghadar Movement in Thailand, 1914–1917: Overseas Indian ‘Rebels’ and Their Multinational Asian Assistants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1