美国地区记分卡:比较美国各地区选定的经济变量

J. Ojih
{"title":"美国地区记分卡:比较美国各地区选定的经济变量","authors":"J. Ojih","doi":"10.4236/OJBM.2021.93058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this \npaper, the patterns of differences of some key economic variables among the \nfour major U.S. regions are investigated. These four regions include: Northeast, Midwest, South and West. The grouping of individual U.S. \nstates into these four regions is in accordance \nwith the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Department of Commerce \nclassification. Two main points are explored in this study. The first one \nexamined and summarized the descriptive statistics of the variables for states \nin these four regions. These variables and data were culled from the databases \nof U.S. Census Bureau, the Bureau of \nEconomic Analysis (BEA), the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Bureau of Labor \nStatistics, World Population Review and the U.S Department of Agriculture. The second one covered the identification of \nthe four regions’ similarities and dissimilarities for the identified \nvariables. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is the statistical tool for the \ntesting hypothesis of four regions’ means equality. To ascertain whether the \nregions that ranked the highest actually differ from another and from the remaining regions, the researcher made use of multiple comparison \nprocedures, specifically the Scheffe test.","PeriodicalId":411102,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Business and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U.S. Regional Scorecard: Comparing U.S. Regions for Selected Economic Variables\",\"authors\":\"J. Ojih\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/OJBM.2021.93058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this \\npaper, the patterns of differences of some key economic variables among the \\nfour major U.S. regions are investigated. These four regions include: Northeast, Midwest, South and West. The grouping of individual U.S. \\nstates into these four regions is in accordance \\nwith the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Department of Commerce \\nclassification. Two main points are explored in this study. The first one \\nexamined and summarized the descriptive statistics of the variables for states \\nin these four regions. These variables and data were culled from the databases \\nof U.S. Census Bureau, the Bureau of \\nEconomic Analysis (BEA), the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Bureau of Labor \\nStatistics, World Population Review and the U.S Department of Agriculture. The second one covered the identification of \\nthe four regions’ similarities and dissimilarities for the identified \\nvariables. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is the statistical tool for the \\ntesting hypothesis of four regions’ means equality. To ascertain whether the \\nregions that ranked the highest actually differ from another and from the remaining regions, the researcher made use of multiple comparison \\nprocedures, specifically the Scheffe test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Business and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJBM.2021.93058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJBM.2021.93058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对美国四个主要地区的一些关键经济变量的差异模式进行了研究。这四个地区包括:东北部、中西部、南部和西部。将美国各州划分为这四个地区是根据美国人口普查局和美国商务部的分类。本研究主要探讨两点。第一篇研究并总结了这四个地区各州变量的描述性统计数据。这些变量和数据是从美国人口普查局、经济分析局、美国商务部、劳工统计局、世界人口评论和美国农业部的数据库中挑选出来的。第二部分涵盖了识别四个区域对识别变量的相似性和差异性。单因素方差分析(ANOVA)是检验四个区域均值相等假设的统计工具。为了确定排名最高的区域是否真的与其他区域以及其他区域不同,研究人员使用了多种比较程序,特别是舍夫测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
U.S. Regional Scorecard: Comparing U.S. Regions for Selected Economic Variables
In this paper, the patterns of differences of some key economic variables among the four major U.S. regions are investigated. These four regions include: Northeast, Midwest, South and West. The grouping of individual U.S. states into these four regions is in accordance with the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Department of Commerce classification. Two main points are explored in this study. The first one examined and summarized the descriptive statistics of the variables for states in these four regions. These variables and data were culled from the databases of U.S. Census Bureau, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, World Population Review and the U.S Department of Agriculture. The second one covered the identification of the four regions’ similarities and dissimilarities for the identified variables. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is the statistical tool for the testing hypothesis of four regions’ means equality. To ascertain whether the regions that ranked the highest actually differ from another and from the remaining regions, the researcher made use of multiple comparison procedures, specifically the Scheffe test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of the Recovery Path of the Consumer Sector in the Post-Pandemic Era An Analysis of the Recovery Path of the Consumer Sector in the Post-Pandemic Era The Effect of Employee Engagement on Employee Performance in Ghana’s MSMEs Sector during COVID-19: The Moderating Role of Job Resources Management Share Proprietory and Firm Value: Are There Peculiar Determinants? Historical Perspectives and the Emergence of the Sustainability Concept in Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1