{"title":"利用动态时间翘曲评估空气质量模型的误差","authors":"Jessica Lin, G. Cervone, P. Franzese","doi":"10.1145/1869890.1869895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An estimate of the error between the mean concentration of a released pollutant simulated by an atmospheric dispersion model and the values measured at the ground is obtained using Dynamic Time Warping (DTW). The error measure is relevant to the application with iterative source detection algorithms based on forward numerical transport and dispersion simulations. The new proposed measure is compared with two established error functions commonly used in the literature.\n A sensitivity study of the error measure to wind direction was performed using real world data from the Prairie Grass field experiment. Whereas both standard measures found smallest error only with a few degrees of wind direction, DTW found the smallest error with a much larger range of wind directions, often as high as 20 degrees.","PeriodicalId":370250,"journal":{"name":"Data Management in Grids","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of error in air quality models using dynamic time warping\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Lin, G. Cervone, P. Franzese\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1869890.1869895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An estimate of the error between the mean concentration of a released pollutant simulated by an atmospheric dispersion model and the values measured at the ground is obtained using Dynamic Time Warping (DTW). The error measure is relevant to the application with iterative source detection algorithms based on forward numerical transport and dispersion simulations. The new proposed measure is compared with two established error functions commonly used in the literature.\\n A sensitivity study of the error measure to wind direction was performed using real world data from the Prairie Grass field experiment. Whereas both standard measures found smallest error only with a few degrees of wind direction, DTW found the smallest error with a much larger range of wind directions, often as high as 20 degrees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data Management in Grids\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data Management in Grids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1869890.1869895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Management in Grids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1869890.1869895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
利用动态时间翘曲(Dynamic Time Warping, DTW)估计了大气扩散模型模拟的污染物平均浓度与地面测量值之间的误差。误差测量与基于正演数值输运和色散模拟的迭代源检测算法的应用有关。并与文献中常用的两种已建立的误差函数进行了比较。利用草原草田间实测数据,进行了误差测量对风向的敏感性研究。虽然两种标准测量方法都只发现了几度风向的最小误差,但DTW在更大的风向范围内发现了最小误差,通常高达20度。
Assessment of error in air quality models using dynamic time warping
An estimate of the error between the mean concentration of a released pollutant simulated by an atmospheric dispersion model and the values measured at the ground is obtained using Dynamic Time Warping (DTW). The error measure is relevant to the application with iterative source detection algorithms based on forward numerical transport and dispersion simulations. The new proposed measure is compared with two established error functions commonly used in the literature.
A sensitivity study of the error measure to wind direction was performed using real world data from the Prairie Grass field experiment. Whereas both standard measures found smallest error only with a few degrees of wind direction, DTW found the smallest error with a much larger range of wind directions, often as high as 20 degrees.