2019冠状病毒病对巴西司法的影响:大流行后背景下对司法4.0和100%数字判决的思考

Paulo Cezar Dias, Heitor Moreira de Oliveira
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病对巴西司法的影响:大流行后背景下对司法4.0和100%数字判决的思考","authors":"Paulo Cezar Dias, Heitor Moreira de Oliveira","doi":"10.30958/ajl.9-1-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to examine the impact that the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic had on the organisation and routine of the Judiciary in Brazil, especially with regard to the expansion of the use of technology in judicial activities. It is not forgotten that the start of the Brazilian Judiciary virtualisation dates to the beginning of the 1990s and, even since 2006, there is a law that deals with the electronic judicial process. However, the pandemic period generated intense investment by the judicial Public Administration in the digital fulfilment of electronic procedural acts, such as videoconference hearings, an alternative found as a way to guarantee the continuity of judicial provision during the period of suspension of face-to-face activities (physical). Like that, the article will approach some of the important innovations that the Brazilian Judiciary suffered during the pandemic, with emphasis on the Justice 4.0 and 100% Digital Judgment. The research was developed under theoretical and hypothetical-deductive methods, based on a broad systematic review of the literature, including books and scientific articles, in addition to consultation of normative acts and legislation. In the end, it is concluded that the pandemic left an unquestionable positive legacy for the Judiciary virtualisation in Brazil in a future post-pandemic context. Keywords: Brazilian judiciary; COVID-19 pandemic; Electronic justice; Justice 4.0; 100% Digital Judgment.","PeriodicalId":184533,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of COVID-19 on Brazilian Judiciary: Reflections on a Justice 4.0 and a 100% Digital Judgment in the Post-pandemic Context\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Cezar Dias, Heitor Moreira de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/ajl.9-1-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to examine the impact that the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic had on the organisation and routine of the Judiciary in Brazil, especially with regard to the expansion of the use of technology in judicial activities. It is not forgotten that the start of the Brazilian Judiciary virtualisation dates to the beginning of the 1990s and, even since 2006, there is a law that deals with the electronic judicial process. However, the pandemic period generated intense investment by the judicial Public Administration in the digital fulfilment of electronic procedural acts, such as videoconference hearings, an alternative found as a way to guarantee the continuity of judicial provision during the period of suspension of face-to-face activities (physical). Like that, the article will approach some of the important innovations that the Brazilian Judiciary suffered during the pandemic, with emphasis on the Justice 4.0 and 100% Digital Judgment. The research was developed under theoretical and hypothetical-deductive methods, based on a broad systematic review of the literature, including books and scientific articles, in addition to consultation of normative acts and legislation. In the end, it is concluded that the pandemic left an unquestionable positive legacy for the Judiciary virtualisation in Brazil in a future post-pandemic context. Keywords: Brazilian judiciary; COVID-19 pandemic; Electronic justice; Justice 4.0; 100% Digital Judgment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.9-1-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.9-1-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在研究COVID-19大流行的出现对巴西司法机构的组织和日常工作的影响,特别是在司法活动中扩大使用技术方面的影响。值得注意的是,巴西司法系统的虚拟化始于上世纪90年代初,甚至从2006年起,就有了一项关于电子司法程序的法律。然而,大流行病期间,司法公共行政部门在电子程序行为的数字化履行方面进行了大量投资,例如视频会议听证会,这是一种在面对面活动(实体)暂停期间保证司法规定连续性的替代办法。就像这样,本文将探讨巴西司法机构在疫情期间遭受的一些重要创新,重点是司法4.0和100%数字审判。这项研究是根据理论和假设-演绎方法进行的,其基础是对包括书籍和科学文章在内的文献进行广泛系统的审查,此外还咨询了规范性行为和立法。最后,本文得出结论,该流行病为巴西在未来大流行后的司法虚拟化留下了无可置疑的积极遗产。关键词:巴西司法;COVID-19流行;电子正义;正义4.0;100%数字判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of COVID-19 on Brazilian Judiciary: Reflections on a Justice 4.0 and a 100% Digital Judgment in the Post-pandemic Context
This paper aims to examine the impact that the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic had on the organisation and routine of the Judiciary in Brazil, especially with regard to the expansion of the use of technology in judicial activities. It is not forgotten that the start of the Brazilian Judiciary virtualisation dates to the beginning of the 1990s and, even since 2006, there is a law that deals with the electronic judicial process. However, the pandemic period generated intense investment by the judicial Public Administration in the digital fulfilment of electronic procedural acts, such as videoconference hearings, an alternative found as a way to guarantee the continuity of judicial provision during the period of suspension of face-to-face activities (physical). Like that, the article will approach some of the important innovations that the Brazilian Judiciary suffered during the pandemic, with emphasis on the Justice 4.0 and 100% Digital Judgment. The research was developed under theoretical and hypothetical-deductive methods, based on a broad systematic review of the literature, including books and scientific articles, in addition to consultation of normative acts and legislation. In the end, it is concluded that the pandemic left an unquestionable positive legacy for the Judiciary virtualisation in Brazil in a future post-pandemic context. Keywords: Brazilian judiciary; COVID-19 pandemic; Electronic justice; Justice 4.0; 100% Digital Judgment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Welfare Models and Community Enterprises: Commons and Sustainable Economy Complexity of Legal Harmonisation in Southeast Asia: A Diversity of Legal Systems & Languages Promoting Effective Refugee Protection in India: Balancing National Interests and International Obligations Legal Assessment of the Condition of Recourse to Domestic Judicial Authorities in the Judicial Procedures of the European Court of Human Rights with a view to the Case of Salahuddin Anju and others v. Turkey Network Analysis and Control System in Mega Projects: The Case of PICASP Erasmus Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1