俄亥俄州减少耕作减少二氧化碳通量:用数据克服猜想

Deb L. O'Dell, N. Eash, B. Hicks, Joel N. Oetting, T. Sauer, D. Lambert, J. Logan, W. Wright, J. Zahn
{"title":"俄亥俄州减少耕作减少二氧化碳通量:用数据克服猜想","authors":"Deb L. O'Dell, N. Eash, B. Hicks, Joel N. Oetting, T. Sauer, D. Lambert, J. Logan, W. Wright, J. Zahn","doi":"10.5539/JAS.V10N3P1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the literature is clear about excessive tillage decreasing soil carbon (C) content, there are few experimental studies that document the comparative effects of soil and crop management on C sequestration. Using micrometeorology we measured CO2 flux from a maize crop grown on both no-till and tilled soils in north-central Ohio. We used Bowen Ratio Energy Balance (BREB) systems to quantify the flux between the atmosphere and either the soil surface (at crop planting) or 0.2 m above the canopy once the crop was established and growing. The no-till plot sequestered 263 g CO2 m-2 (90% confidence interval -432.1 to -99.9) while the tilled plot emitted 146 g CO2 m-2 (90% confidence interval -53.3 to 332.2) during 104 days of the 2015 growing season; a net difference of 410 g CO2 m-2. The difference is statistically significant at the 90% confidence level (based on a bootstrap analysis). The results indicate that no-tillage practices can sequester C, maintain soil productivity, and ensure landscape sustainability.","PeriodicalId":184130,"journal":{"name":"Prime Archives in Agricultural Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing CO2 Flux by Decreasing Tillage in Ohio: Overcoming Conjecture with Data\",\"authors\":\"Deb L. O'Dell, N. Eash, B. Hicks, Joel N. Oetting, T. Sauer, D. Lambert, J. Logan, W. Wright, J. Zahn\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/JAS.V10N3P1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the literature is clear about excessive tillage decreasing soil carbon (C) content, there are few experimental studies that document the comparative effects of soil and crop management on C sequestration. Using micrometeorology we measured CO2 flux from a maize crop grown on both no-till and tilled soils in north-central Ohio. We used Bowen Ratio Energy Balance (BREB) systems to quantify the flux between the atmosphere and either the soil surface (at crop planting) or 0.2 m above the canopy once the crop was established and growing. The no-till plot sequestered 263 g CO2 m-2 (90% confidence interval -432.1 to -99.9) while the tilled plot emitted 146 g CO2 m-2 (90% confidence interval -53.3 to 332.2) during 104 days of the 2015 growing season; a net difference of 410 g CO2 m-2. The difference is statistically significant at the 90% confidence level (based on a bootstrap analysis). The results indicate that no-tillage practices can sequester C, maintain soil productivity, and ensure landscape sustainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prime Archives in Agricultural Research\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prime Archives in Agricultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/JAS.V10N3P1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prime Archives in Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/JAS.V10N3P1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

虽然文献清楚地表明过度耕作会降低土壤碳(C)含量,但很少有实验研究记录土壤和作物管理对碳固存的比较影响。利用微气象学,我们测量了俄亥俄州中北部一种玉米作物在免耕和耕两种土壤上的二氧化碳通量。我们使用鲍文比能量平衡(BREB)系统来量化大气与土壤表面(作物种植时)或作物建立和生长后冠层上方0.2 m之间的通量。在2015年生长季的104天内,免耕区吸收了263 g CO2 m-2(90%置信区间为-432.1 ~ -99.9),而耕区排放了146 g CO2 m-2(90%置信区间为-53.3 ~ 332.2);净差为410克CO2 m-2。在90%的置信水平上(基于自举分析),差异具有统计学意义。结果表明,免耕可以固碳,保持土壤生产力,保证景观可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reducing CO2 Flux by Decreasing Tillage in Ohio: Overcoming Conjecture with Data
While the literature is clear about excessive tillage decreasing soil carbon (C) content, there are few experimental studies that document the comparative effects of soil and crop management on C sequestration. Using micrometeorology we measured CO2 flux from a maize crop grown on both no-till and tilled soils in north-central Ohio. We used Bowen Ratio Energy Balance (BREB) systems to quantify the flux between the atmosphere and either the soil surface (at crop planting) or 0.2 m above the canopy once the crop was established and growing. The no-till plot sequestered 263 g CO2 m-2 (90% confidence interval -432.1 to -99.9) while the tilled plot emitted 146 g CO2 m-2 (90% confidence interval -53.3 to 332.2) during 104 days of the 2015 growing season; a net difference of 410 g CO2 m-2. The difference is statistically significant at the 90% confidence level (based on a bootstrap analysis). The results indicate that no-tillage practices can sequester C, maintain soil productivity, and ensure landscape sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reducing CO2 Flux by Decreasing Tillage in Ohio: Overcoming Conjecture with Data Socioeconomic Analysis of Rural Credit and Technical Assistance for Family Farmers in the Transamazonian Territory, in the Brazilian Amazon Mechanisms and Sources of Resistance in Tropical Maize Inbred Lines to Chilopartellus Stem Borers Benefits and Challenges of Serious Gaming - The Case of “The Maladaptation Game” Advanced Breeding Tools in Vegetable Crops
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1